wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,962
- Reactions
- 13,264
Can you explain, apart from sheer randomness, why a gap should fill?Hi Shark,
M8, A Gap is still a Gap regardless of the reasons - in fact a Gap caused by a Dividend probably caries more weight than a Gap caused by a rogue trade, or a sell-off/spike caused by rumours, or as you mentioned, an unexpected news event.
I will mention however, that an Ex Div Gap probably won't take long to fill, unless there are other underlying issues.
see pages 203 to 212
Cheers.
DrB
don't know how i missed this earlier, but that gap from 3 sep - 6 sep is purely from it going ex that huge 2.11 div ie. if it weren't for the div, the 6 sep open would have been right on the 3 sep close. does it still carry the same weight that a non-ex div gap otherwise would, given that it's caused by a known and predictable event, rather than from a shift in sentiment or an unexpected news event?
genuine question... i don't consider myself much of a chartist, and i'm not really a day trader either (i mostly sell weekly to monthly options) so i'd be interested to hear how others would interpret it.
I don't follow this Dr Bourse. The change in company value pre and ex dividend is black and white. One day the company has $2billion in cash in its accounts which are reflected in the share value and the next day those funds have been transferred to the individual shareholders and are no longer on the companies books. The arbitrage opportunities around pre and post dividend are legendary.I guess that the LOGICAL explanation is that - we as Traders, Trade with the expectation that an Ex Div Date, or an Announcement, or some news event, increasing or decreasing a SP.
So I guess you could blame all Gaps on ourselves. ???
Actually FMG holders that owned the share before the EX dividend were 78 cents better off per share than those that purchased on ex date Because they also received a franking credit worth 90cents.I prefer to enter a trade from AFTER the Ex Div Date drop has occurred - that way in effect, I get the same $2.11 that you received but it takes a few days/weeks for the SP to return to where it was Pre Ex Div Date, AND I don't end up in the ATO's sights.
We are all different, guess I'm just
I agree,I don't follow this Dr Bourse. The change in company value pre and ex dividend is black and white. One day the company has $2billion in cash in its accounts which are reflected in the share value and the next day those funds have been transferred to the individual shareholders and are no longer on the companies books. The arbitrage opportunities around pre and post dividend are legendary.
If the dividend is relatively small in relation to the companies worth then there will be only a small variation. This was not the case this year for FMG, RIO or BHP who all declared massive dividends. And naturally all shares fell by this amount ex dividend.
I would say you are confusing intrinsic value with book value.Very few people in this world really understand Balance Sheets and the associated Ratio's, Margins of Safety, etc., and the "smoke'n'Mirrors" games that are played out - They are way too complicated to explain here, even if I understood it all, and I don't.
I feel you are confusing the “change in company value ( which you suggest is the Share Value/Share Price)”, with the Company Balance Sheet – they are 2 entirely different things.
The SV/SP of any stock, at any given time is an abstract thing – The SV/SP is something that Brokers try to calculate with their yearly Guesstimates, then they tell the public of that Mythical Figure, then the public go forth and buy up to that mythical amount. - The SV/SP is not dictated by billions of $$ in cash, The SV/SP is decided by US and The Sheep, The SV/SP is derived from what we, the public, are prepared to pay for that share.
The Balance Sheet, supposedly represents the Companys INTRINSIC VALUE.
NOW TO EXPLAIN
An Intrinsic Value is not a TA call - Intrinsic Value Per Share is not a call on where the Share Price will go to - Intrinsic Value is basically what the company is worth Per Share, based on the company’s published Financial Statements - Basically if the company was ‘wound up’, then each shareholder should get that Intrinsic amount - they would not necessarily get the current Share Price.......
So an Intrinsic Value Call of $2.00 is saying, “are you sure you want to pay $5.53 (the current share price) for a share that is only worth $2.00”. Those people that know what ‘Intrinsic Value” is, understand what is insinuated, - those people that later call us idiots just because the Share Price did not reach that Intrinsic Value are the ones showing their ignorance on the topic…..
Hundreds of times over the past years I’ve made Intrinsic Value calls - which are usually close to the mark - only to be told that I’m an idiot because the Share Price will never get to those values - No one really expects the Share Price to reach those Intrinsic Values, so I usually don’t bother trying to explain it…..
From my perspective if a Company has an Unfavourable IV (as explained above), then I do not proceed any further....
As a "Technimental Trader" the IV Test is "The First of several Analysis Processes" for me, and it is only a Minor Test.....
An IV can be calculated in numerous different ways – A correct and Valid IV relies a lot on what formulas are used, such as, DCFM, DDM, DDMF, PRESVAL, RIV, IVRR, NROE, CGVI, GIVF, BIVF – and there are numerous others - MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND WHICH FORMULAS ARE BEING USED and what the implications are relating to each formula...Remember the old saying, “Garbage in = Garbage out”.......
DCFM = Discount Cash Flow Method, DDM = Dividend Discount Method, DDMF =Dividend Discount Method (Forward Return on Equity), PRESVAL = Calculates the Present Value of the Discounted Future Cash Flow per Share, RIV = Residual Income Valuation, IVRR = Intrinsic Value by Rate of Return, NROE = Normalised Return on Equity, CGVI = Comparative Growth & Value Indicator, GIVF = Grahams IV Formula, BIVF = Buffetts Balance Sheet IV........
Each Analyst/Broker has their own versions of “how to calculate an IV”.....for example –the Morgan Stanley ModelWare is a proprietary analytic framework that helps clients uncover value, adjusting for distortions and ambiguities created by local accounting regulations....... In ModelWare, EPS adjusts for one-time events, capitalizes operating leases (where their use is significant), and converts inventory from LIFO costing to a FIFO basis. ModelWare also emphasizes the separation of operating performance of a company from its financing for a more complete view of how a company generates earnings.......
BOTTOM LINE HERE IS --- To use an IV correctly you MUST understand how it is calculated..... Personally, I have an Excel Spreadsheet that incorporates most of the above formulas...
That’s all a bit long winded, but it’s a complicated subject.
Hope you can follow all that.
I didn’t say IV has anything to do with BV, they are completely different things, I said you we’re confusing the two eg when you described what you called IV you were describing BV, you said IV was the winding up value, which it’s not, for most companies that aren’t dying IV will be the value of the going concern not what would be returned to shareholders if it was liquidated.Warren would love to hear you say that VC - surely you are joking!
IV has nothing to do with BV.
This is what I am talking about-The Balance Sheet, supposedly represents the Companys INTRINSIC VALUE.
NOW TO EXPLAIN
An Intrinsic Value is not a TA call - Intrinsic Value Per Share is not a call on where the Share Price will go to - Intrinsic Value is basically what the company is worth Per Share, based on the company’s published Financial Statements - Basically if the company was ‘wound up’, then each shareholder should get that Intrinsic amount - they would not necessarily get the current Share Price.......
As some one who has read every single book Graham has written, I can tell you that you didn’t actually explain Intrinsic Value, you explained book value.Well all I can say is that I tried my best to explain Warren Buffet & Ben Grahams Intrinsic Value is, so I guess your next post should be to tell them both that they are wrong - Good Luck with that.
And by the way you had better tell Warren that most of his books are wrong also.
You have your opinions and I have mine, lets just leave it at that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?