- Joined
- 18 September 2008
- Posts
- 4,041
- Reactions
- 1,185
lol, I think they just want to be treated as you would treat any one else, They aren't generally asking for special consideration, just the right to live as any other person of their gender lives.
Not wanting to go too far off topic but this is something I read in Scientific American today that is relevant to transgender issues.
The Spectrum of Sex Development: Eric Vilain and the Intersex Controversy
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ent-eric-vilain-and-the-intersex-controversy/
Kids shouldn't be operated on for gender issues , they can make up their own minds later.
Not wanting to go too far off topic but this is something I read in Scientific American today that is relevant to transgender issues.
The Spectrum of Sex Development: Eric Vilain and the Intersex Controversy
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ent-eric-vilain-and-the-intersex-controversy/
60-70 years ago, if a student tried to write with their left hand, teacher would smack the "bad hand" with the cane or ruler and force the "southpaw" to "do it right".
We've come a long way since then.
If parents and teachers stopped making a fuss about childish issues, taught and treated every child as a child, there won't be any need to drug so many youngsters, operate on them, or have a Shrink mess with their "gender identification". In many non-English languages, a child is an "it". No need to expose every child to the possibility that some of their class mates may be uncertain - as yet - about their gender.
But I guess it's keeping a whole bunch of shrinks and pharmacists employed.
The thing that I loath is that children are being used as foot soldiers to push minority agendas, by the gay lobby in particular in respect to gay parenting, using bullying as a cover.
Sure bullying must be eliminated but it's not just gays that get bullied, in my day it was kids with glasses or those not good at sport, but I didn't see the shortsighted police at my school.
....they are just giving her a drug....
Yes, using children as guinea pigs.
Let children enjoy their childhood rather than all this gender talk of who they would like to be.
I also have to question, who in their right mind would disfigure another human being as I posted above.
http://twitter.com/lheron/status/733758898855940098WHITER THAN MEDIA WATCH- Sunday, May 22, 2016
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailyteleg...lytelegraph/comments/whiter_than_media_watch/
At the Huffington Post, they love to talk about diversity.
Now let’s meet the staff.
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailyteleg...ilytelegraph/comments/nick_off1/#commentsmore
No conviction for little Miss Minus:
A cartoonist who was caught on camera spitting at the administrator of the Inner West Council during a volatile meeting has been sentenced to an 18-month good behaviour bond for offensive behaviour.
Nicky Minus escaped a conviction, with Magistrate Clare Farnan saying she accepted the 26-year-old was immediately remorseful and a criminal conviction would affect her future post graduate studies.
Her lawyer Miranda Moody entered her guilty plea in Newtown Local Court this morning, describing her act as “disgraceful”, claiming she was “carried away” in the moment.
“She spat once and she immediately knew it was wrong it was a completely repulsive act,” Ms Moody said.
“The moment that she did it she was instantaneously remorseful …”
The agreed facts tendered to the court reveal that following the incident, Minus told police, “I did not know spitting was an offence”.
To be fair, the things Nicky doesn’t know could fill a library.
It is something I think about often but particularly when a comment, that I wholeheartedly oppose, is made in a public forum. In that instance I try to play the point not the person. Of course I’m sure some people will disagree but I did the same when Tony Abbott referred to a candidate’s sex appeal. Instead of just throwing insults at him I tried to explain why his comments were inappropriate and damaging.
I don’t tread carefully to placate anyone but because I want to make it as difficult as possible for anyone to dismiss my perspective as the rantings of another angry man hating feminist. I realise I won’t always succeed but also I’m not sure whether just getting angry at the person would always succeed either.
The article is really a self congratulatory biased piece, ageist overtones and dismissive of men having any redeeming features in general = Tanya and Penny personify this attitude.
Nothing seems to be said about Jacquie Lambie and her nymphomaniac desires for "a man with a packet".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?