- Joined
- 24 December 2005
- Posts
- 2,601
- Reactions
- 2,065
Your knowledge of climate is vacant.Here is a photo of mum and daughter, look at the child's eyes, they look vacant, look at mum's eyes they look like they could smash granite. Never make mum angry.
Yet you link your idea to a student who actually knows what she is talking about.... but above anything I hate fanatics and brainwashing, the race to the lower denominator
How exactly is that relevant?->should they blow themselves in the name of Allah, burn butcher shops in the name of global warning/veganism or annihilate jews, blacks or christians, or anyone thinking differently.
Again, you seem very confused about what constitutes a good education.If you start using the grand master scheme of propaganda for a cause, like brainwashing children as per that case, you are a radical and believe that if the cause is great , there is no limit
You really need to tone it down - necessary action to mitigate climate change is political and economic.where would you stop, would you kill, how many, after all you could save the earth, your children mankind agains the evil diesel burners, meat eaters, western civilisation that brought us the steam engine
Not really relevant what people believe about AGW; only concerted action will have an impact and attitudes like yours are symbolic of the problem faced.Bring a bit of critical spirit, and common sense, realise that whatever you or Emman, or even the whole West can say or do, half the planet at least does not give a **** about GW, could not care less and only dream about eating more pork or beef and drive a bigger car have a bigger house.
If other Asperger sufferers are found to be pushing a more skeptical message, will you be as cognisant of their mental acuity?
I have been closely acquainted to at least three people with Aspergers. All three display the classic markers. Only one is pro AGW, the other two are extremely sceptical and believe that those pro AGW have bought into a grand scale fallacy (or perhaps even a deliberate hoax).Frankly Cynic people with Aspergers are almost always exceptionally accurate with their understanding of reality. The challenges they face are trying to work out why most of the population plays all sorts of social games to avoid facing reality. I am sometimes uncomfortable with them because their directness and accuracy is challenging. In my experience there is almost no way they would be skeptical of CC.
...
Well, there is no accounting for ignorance.I have been closely acquainted to at least three people with Aspergers. All three display the classic markers. Only one is pro AGW, the other two are extremely sceptical and believe that those pro AGW have bought into a grand scale fallacy (or perhaps even a deliberate hoax).
Was thinking
Apologies Basilio, you are probably a good person and believe you are doing the right thing.a few brainwash teens will not change much
i will leave that thread to you.sadly i believe you are both dangerous to the cause you defend and most of all, to the people you condemn to poverty and failure while not doing the remediation we need nor tackling the causes issues.
Get out of Guardian induced media frenzy, you, your familly and friend will appreciate and the world might not be better for it, but definitively not worse
I am out of that thread.you win
the Cause is victorious, and when gw will ravage australia you will remember how these deniers prevented you from saving the world
I have been closely acquainted to at least three people with Aspergers. All three display the classic markers. Only one is pro AGW, the other two are extremely sceptical and believe that those pro AGW have bought into a grand scale fallacy (or perhaps even a deliberate hoax).
https://twitter.com/GlacierThwaites@[B said:ElizabethaRush[/B]]
Elizabeth Rush16 hours ago
Thwaites' calving edge: sailing through what was solid ice sheet just a few years ago.... @glacierthwaites
It would suit me very nicely if it wasn't true but I see too much evidence around me which says it probably is real.I was one of those who was blase about GW. Listening to right wing media like Macquarie had me unsure.
It would suit me very nicely if it wasn't true but I see too much evidence around me which says it probably is real.
There's not much in common between Tasmania, south-east Queensland and the city of Adelaide but they've all set new weather records for hot and/or dry conditions in the past few weeks.
For anyone still doubting I've got a question:
Mention Scotland and what comes to mind?
Whatever you're thinking of I'll take a damn good guess that it doesn't involve the place catching fire in Winter. That's about the last thing anyone would expect. Fires, in winter, in Scotland. A ridiculous sounding concept that has actually happened in a place where being snowed in would be a more expected problem.
The blaze is nothing by Australian standards but it's a problem locals would never have thought they'd be needing to deal with and it's a sign that yes things are changing.
You have no evidence for that claim to be true.Smurf, I don't think there is any doubt we are in the top end or nearing the top end of a oscillating cycle of high temperatures.
Where is this the case now in Australia, or likely to be so during the next century?If there is a lot of snow and ice cover then solar will be useless, wind-power will freeze up and potentially break if too much ice load is put onto the blades.
The panels are rated to withstand severe weather conditions, but hail stones which break through tiled rooves and smash car windscreens are in a league of their own.We should be looking at creating unbreakable solar panels, there is so much we should be doing to create better power generation.
Australia just had its all time hottest summer - do you really think we are waiting for it to get hotter stillIf in the event we get hotter, more people will start installing ACs. (I have resisted the urge so far) so there will be more demand for power.
You might be right - whoever these people are. However the IPCC has clearly mapped what the future holds under different settings, so its not hard to see what should be done.There is very little common sense with the GW alarmists, they haven't set appropriate priorities.
Climate science is not politics. Politicians don't change the data.It might easily lose its entire support base with as simple a thing as a political test case. If the CC political group don't win then there would be a good argument to be made that the national does not support the notion of CC science.
Priorities is right, geeezzz:-
Offering proof about something occurring in the future is impossible, it can be modeled which is only as good as the information put in to create the model, much can happen between model and outcome. However there appears to be a physics map of long term oscillations of planets associated with heating and cooling periods. This seems more reliable than human modeled adjusted projections.You have no evidence for that claim to be true.
Most of the hottest years ever recorded have occurred this century and this has been the case during periods of decreasing irradiance.
Where is this the case now in Australia, or likely to be so during the next century?
The panels are rated to withstand severe weather conditions, but hail stones which break through tiled rooves and smash car windscreens are in a league of their own.
We may have the coldest winter on record this coming winter in Australia let's see. As they average it out we will not know if 2019 is going to be anything special. As I keep saying on my charts, time will tell.Australia just had its all time hottest summer - do you really think we are waiting for it to get hotter still.
We should be looking at all possible outcomes of future weather scenarios not just one agenda put forward by a political group-think of people. It is the InterGovernmental Panel for Climate Change. The people who represent each country are political appointees. The whole thing is a huge political agenda. The bottom line is to create a worldwide taxation which they are attempting to force on to nations worldwide to accommodate a green agenda.You might be right - whoever these people are. However the IPCC has clearly mapped what the future holds under different settings, so its not hard to see what should be done.
Climate science is not politics. Politicians don't change the data.
39.1 thus far - by the standards of what’s normal in Tasmania that is truly extreme heat.Tasmania's turn today, as of right now it's 38.0 degrees in Hobart (BOM official data) which is a new record for March, exceeding the previous record of 37.3 and the day's not over yet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?