Darc Knight
Investor not Trader
- Joined
- 28 February 2015
- Posts
- 1,211
- Reactions
- 607
Fake News - Global Warming Consensus
- Thread starter Ann
- Start date
- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 19,942
- Reactions
- 12,419
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
My most recent link was at post #345.
However, you seem oblivious to science so it's no mystery that you missed it.
Is there a point where you will make a relevant comment?
Evidence in this thread suggests you are incapable.
Your ineptitude showed through after you linked to an article (without comment) from 2003, which was already covered in an article I had earlier linked to about the same type of issue, but mine was from 2013.
So far you are on a hiding to nothing from what I and others visiting here can see.
- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,411
- Reactions
- 24,184
The one interesting fact, is how emotional people get, about something obviously no one is an expert on.
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
Let's see what cynic can do.Why should anyone bother, you would just say the science is biased.
Most trolls prove themselves to be totally inept, and evidence thus far for cynic appears to be compelling.
I carry no truck with word salad, poor logic, obfuscation or misdirection. So far cynic has a perfect score.
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
Please call me out if I appear emotional.The one interesting fact, is how emotional people get, about something obviously no one is an expert on.
The one interesting fact nowadays is that most of us here know how to research using the internet. So become an expert at that to introduce the science which is readily available and which you rely on when making a claim on a particular matter.
- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,411
- Reactions
- 24,184
Please don't take it personally, it was a general observation.
- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
You do me an injustice, Sir.Why should anyone bother, you would just say the science is biased.
I would never accuse science of being biased. It would be nonsensical to do so.
Bias (a.k.a. prejudice within this particular context) is to my understanding the sole province of sentient beings.
It seems that we may be on different pages of different hymn books in this discussion.
Perhaps we have a different understanding of the definition of commonly used words.
Would you care to aid the progression of this discussion by disclosing your understanding of the meaning of the word science?!
Darc Knight
Investor not Trader
- Joined
- 28 February 2015
- Posts
- 1,211
- Reactions
- 607
The one interesting fact, is how emotional people get, about something obviously no one is an expert on.
Cynic's trolling is generally viewed as an annoyance. A coward getting his jollies from behind a keyboard. The emotion this time around is amusement.
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
Please read #365.
You retain your perfect score.
- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,411
- Reactions
- 24,184
Yes, what I was getting at, is a lot of threads drift into emotionally driven debate, rather than outcome driven.
Somewhat like the Trump threads, they are basically just rant threads IMO, I think those threads that are all of a general nature about the same subject, should be rolled into one.
Otherwise finding information becomes awkward.
Just my opinion.
Just looking through page 1 on the General Thread, there are 3 threads saying the same thing about global warming and three threads on Donald Trump saying the same thing.
Why not have a Global Warming thread and a Donald Trump thread, it would make it a lot easier, unless people just like repeating themselves.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
I have read it, and am greatly concerned when purported "scientists" choose, in lieu of solid rebuttals to the longer standing research, to publish their personal inferences.
I eagerly await your definition of science!
Or perhaps you believe yourself to be providing this demonstratively throughout your postings?!
If so, there exists a word far better suited to that which you are practicing!
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
You again offer nothing - retaining your perfect score.
Others seem amused.
- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
That certainly seems a very apt description of someone.
Perhaps that same someone has gotten me confused with one of these:
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Oval-Wal...rors-Wall-Decor-Art-For-Living-Room/374721382
Edit: corrected insert
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 4,045
- Reactions
- 1,404
#science #actualscience #actualtestablescience
https://eos.org/articles/how-arctic-cyclones-change-the-sea-ice
https://eos.org/articles/how-arctic-cyclones-change-the-sea-ice
- Joined
- 25 February 2011
- Posts
- 5,688
- Reactions
- 1,231
More controversy brewing over that inconvenient hiatus:
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-e...nt-give-gop-internal-docs-on-climate-research
Joules, earlier this week, you posted an interesting video which indicated, amongst several things, that some research had been done whereby solar emissions and CO2 concentrations, had somehow been aligned, to demonstrate a correlation with global temperature variations.
I would be most interested to know more about the mechanism via which two quantities (solar radiance, CO2 gas), with distinctly different Units of Measure, were combined and reconciled into a single unit of measure.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-e...nt-give-gop-internal-docs-on-climate-research
Joules, earlier this week, you posted an interesting video which indicated, amongst several things, that some research had been done whereby solar emissions and CO2 concentrations, had somehow been aligned, to demonstrate a correlation with global temperature variations.
I would be most interested to know more about the mechanism via which two quantities (solar radiance, CO2 gas), with distinctly different Units of Measure, were combined and reconciled into a single unit of measure.
explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,197
Of course, the increased temperatures are creating what I've described for a few years now, "the Displacement effect" It's why a friend of mine, a scientist, told me two years ago that we would be all washed away in about five years. Was a bit sceptical myself for awhile but I now know it's time to party.
- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,210
- Reactions
- 17,263
Seems like a reasonable concept to me and helps avoids the issue discussed last year with General Chat taking over the forum whilst retaining the discussion as such.
Well depending on your perspective that's two threads discussing a lot of hot air.....
One thing's for sure though, here's a real environmental problem that can be easily resolved by appropriate action from the company concerned and if needed a consumer boycott to assist in improving their attitude. Oh how ironic it all is - a "tech" company stuck in the 1960's with their business practices:
http://www.thebull.com.au/articles/a/79539-amazon-france-under-fire-for-destroying-unsold-goods.html
- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 4,045
- Reactions
- 1,404
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...0711&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
"Antarctica contains enough ice to raise global sea levels by 57 meters if it ever all melted, a process that would require far higher temperatures than now and thousands of years."
"Antarctica contains enough ice to raise global sea levels by 57 meters if it ever all melted, a process that would require far higher temperatures than now and thousands of years."
