- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,101
- Reactions
- 12,714
Case of sticking to core competency, which is vacuum cleaners.More come in to the EV market, but one goes out.
Dyson has scrapped it's electric car plans.
Hard to see how they could compete with Tesla and China.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-11/dysons-electric-car-wont-go-to-market/11592954
Case of sticking to core competency, which is vacuum cleaners.
You comment on a vacuum cleaner business , I comment on vacuum tube transport , which needs electrical power.Maybe the EV venture sucked the life out of the company ?
The trouble Dyson has is that an electric car in electrical engineering terms is not overly complex.
The trouble Dyson has is that an electric car in electrical engineering terms is not overly complex.
I think in 15 years there will be double the number of car companies and cars will become more commoditized, the money will be in the safety system technology.
It will be Google vs who knows again.
If we base it on an average travel speed of 30 km/h then the average car is being serviced every 300 - 500 hours of operation. That's a truly mind blowing level of maintenance compared to most things.
.
Bit of a worry when a solar car can just "burst into flames".
No word yet on what actually caught fire.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-17/solar-challenge-leading-vehicle-bursts-into-flames/11611112
Happens to petrol races car regularly.
Solar cars don't use petrol, so what caught fire and why ?
Solar cars don't use petrol, so what caught fire and why ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?