Sdajii
Sdaji
- Joined
- 13 October 2009
- Posts
- 2,074
- Reactions
- 2,089
Good grief.
There are cheap ICEVs.
There are no cheap EVs.
Does this compute? Is it simple enough to grasp?
You can only pretend EVs are cheap if you compare them to expensive ICEVs.
You're being completely dishonest.
Another factor in the equation is that EVs probably won't hold their value or last as long as ICEVs. My Subaru is over 20 years old and has done well over 400,000km. Sure, that's unusual, but it still gets about the same range out of a tank as it did the day it drove out of the showroom.
Looking at the life expectancy for ICEVs vs EVs, anything that loaded with tech and gadgets isn't going to age well, and the battery itself will lose efficiency over the years. We all know we don't get as long out of our phone lithium batteries after a couple of years compared to the first six months.
We know that laptops etc become obsolete etc pretty quickly. Even the EV I was driving at less than one month old had some glitches in the electronics and fancy software.
We all know that even looking at traditional cars, the life expectancy has been consistently dropping, which makes purchase price an even bigger consideration.
As QLDFrog says, if you want to compare to a Ferrari, sure, you can make an EV look cheap, but that's just being blatantly dishonest and completely absurd. Find me an EV which is cost competitive with a basic car like the majority of people buy. Or looking at the second hand market, find me an EV a few years old which has decent range etc (a 10 year old second hand ICEV will have a perfectly respectable range). Heck, if you're able to afford a Ferrari or a new Tesla etc, you're hardly worried about the cost of a tank of fuel anyway.
Find me an EV I can fully charge from near empty in a quarter of the time I can refuel an ICEV from empty tank (and even then I won't get the same range out of an EV unless you want to compare the best range EV with the worst range ICEV and completely ignore the radical price differences etc).
There are cheap ICEVs.
There are no cheap EVs.
Does this compute? Is it simple enough to grasp?
You can only pretend EVs are cheap if you compare them to expensive ICEVs.
You're being completely dishonest.
Another factor in the equation is that EVs probably won't hold their value or last as long as ICEVs. My Subaru is over 20 years old and has done well over 400,000km. Sure, that's unusual, but it still gets about the same range out of a tank as it did the day it drove out of the showroom.
Looking at the life expectancy for ICEVs vs EVs, anything that loaded with tech and gadgets isn't going to age well, and the battery itself will lose efficiency over the years. We all know we don't get as long out of our phone lithium batteries after a couple of years compared to the first six months.
We know that laptops etc become obsolete etc pretty quickly. Even the EV I was driving at less than one month old had some glitches in the electronics and fancy software.
We all know that even looking at traditional cars, the life expectancy has been consistently dropping, which makes purchase price an even bigger consideration.
As QLDFrog says, if you want to compare to a Ferrari, sure, you can make an EV look cheap, but that's just being blatantly dishonest and completely absurd. Find me an EV which is cost competitive with a basic car like the majority of people buy. Or looking at the second hand market, find me an EV a few years old which has decent range etc (a 10 year old second hand ICEV will have a perfectly respectable range). Heck, if you're able to afford a Ferrari or a new Tesla etc, you're hardly worried about the cost of a tank of fuel anyway.
Find me an EV I can fully charge from near empty in a quarter of the time I can refuel an ICEV from empty tank (and even then I won't get the same range out of an EV unless you want to compare the best range EV with the worst range ICEV and completely ignore the radical price differences etc).