JohnDe
La dolce vita
- Joined
- 11 March 2020
- Posts
- 4,422
- Reactions
- 6,461
Well, given there are all these fantastic Tesla only superchargers, yesterday I was a bit peeved that at the council run chargers, there were 3 Teslas at the car park using up spaces that can be used by non teslas, but not the other way around.
Mick
You neatly sidestepped the question, which is if the Tesla network is so good, why did 3 Tesla drivers pick the slow chargers at the council parking area, when the non tesla owners do not have the luxury of the reverse.It's a council charging station, open to the public. Don't forget the diesel Ute parked in a charging spot, that is the crime and the owner should have got a parking ticket.
You neatly sidestepped the question, which is if the Tesla network is so good, why did 3 Tesla drivers pick the slow chargers at the council parking area, when the non tesla owners do not have the luxury of the reverse.
Mick
But I was asking what you thought.I have no idea.
There are so many things that go into buying a car, and there are some things that are far more important to potential owner A as compared to potential owner B. I don't assume that every other potential buyer similar requirements to me.
Mick
Yep, if the charger is free or cheaper than a Tesla super charger sometimes teslas will opt to use the non Tesla chargers.Well, given there are all these fantastic Tesla only superchargers, yesterday I was a bit peeved that at the council run chargers, there were 3 Teslas at the car park using up spaces that can be used by non teslas, but not the other way around.
Mick
No, it shows that teslas drivers are self entitled twits.Yep, if the charger is free or cheaper than a Tesla super charger sometimes teslas will opt to use the non Tesla chargers.
I am in Orlando Florida at the moment, and stopped at a charging station that had 10 Tesla chargers, and two non Tesla chargers.
One of the teslas at the station opted to use the non Tesla charger because even though it charged 4 times slower, it was 50% cheaper so the guy decided to use that since he had to go into the super target to do his grocery shopping anyway.
But I guess that’s the benefit of the Tesla, you have the option of using all these other generic chargers, plus you have you own network of super fast chargers.
Hahaha, people make decisions based on price all the time. Some car owners catch the train to avoid parking fees for example etc etc.No, it shows that teslas drivers are self entitled twits.
The bloke has 12 chargers to choose, but chooses one of the two non tesla chargers that only work for "others", because its cheaper.
I thought also tesla owners were saints!.
mick
That route is one I drive regularly, and there are actually 4 extra super chargers that are on it that aren’t showing up on your route map, that you can stop at instead if it aligns better with the travellers need for food or bodily function breaks.Sorry, I didn't see a question only a statement.
I can only guess and give you those guesses:
Just because the Tesla charging network is the best, it doesn't mean that everyone with Tesla is going to use it. Just like Ferrari recommending the use of Shell fuel, it doesn't mean that all Ferrari owners will.
- No nearby Tesla chargers
- Tesla chargers full
- Tesla owner lives in the area, pays council rates and wants something back.
- Tesla owner gets a discount from that particular station.
- Testing out non-Tesla charging network.
- Checking out the competition.
- Showing off.
- Traveling past.
The great thing about the Tesla charging network is that it is fast, situated in decent locations, it is plug & play (no dragging out a card or phone), but best of all is the Tesla software which calculates where to stop and for how long.
View attachment 152327
Fragmentation.if the Tesla network is so good, why did 3 Tesla drivers pick the slow chargers at the council parking area, when the non tesla owners do not have the luxury of the reverse.
Very interesting isn't it.
Still 3 stops for a 900km trip and I assume leaving fully charged.Sorry, I didn't see a question only a statement.
I can only guess and give you those guesses:
Just because the Tesla charging network is the best, it doesn't mean that everyone with Tesla is going to use it. Just like Ferrari recommending the use of Shell fuel, it doesn't mean that all Ferrari owners will.
- No nearby Tesla chargers
- Tesla chargers full
- Tesla owner lives in the area, pays council rates and wants something back.
- Tesla owner gets a discount from that particular station.
- Testing out non-Tesla charging network.
- Checking out the competition.
- Showing off.
- Traveling past.
The great thing about the Tesla charging network is that it is fast, situated in decent locations, it is plug & play (no dragging out a card or phone), but best of all is the Tesla software which calculates where to stop and for how long.
View attachment 152327
Still 3 stops for a 900km trip and I assume leaving fully charged.
More than one hour extra to save at most 80l of diesel or $160 on my antique 4wd ute.
Take a plane....
That assumes you pay zero for recharge.
And this ute work beast is not the most frugal in term of consumption and not an ideal comfort choice either ?
For a fair comparison, you need to have a lot of free time and will never recover the $20k to $30k extra cost of the EV battery in fuel saving only.
The way I see it following this thread with interest:
For a std retail user
EVs are uneconomical , have recharge constraints which are limiting them greatly for away from base travel
So a great runabout choice for cashed up buyers or a bit show off and liking tech early adopters, but otherwise...
I understand that car buying does not have to make sense, Ferraris have been sold for years,and I even bought a 1965 spoke wheels MGB in my age crisis fooliness.
A big thank you to all the EV owners sharing their experience here BTW, even the ones on my ignore list.
Most appreciated
Tesla Model Y review.
$2900 for a coat of paint !
Can you supply a bit more info? I have no time today to watch videos.
Not really sorry. I'm just in the process of watching the video, but I have to go out soon.
At about the 1:10 mark red multi coat costs $2,900.OK, thought you must have watched it before posting and mentioning paint & price.
I watched the first several minutes, no mention of $2900 or paint. I'm presuming that you are referring to the extra cost for Premium paints, if so, most if not all manufacturers offer a premium paint option at a higher cost. Though the Tesla price does not match your figure. maybe it also includes the white interior, which is an added cost.
When you can please let me know what you were referring to, I am intrigued.
Design Your Model Y | Tesla
Design and order your Tesla Model Y, the car of the future.www.tesla.com
At about the 1:10 mark red multi coat costs $2,900.
Given that they have such a big margin on sales, why would Tesla cannibalise that profit to make smaller cars?It’s been the subject of speculation for several years. Can and will Tesla make a low cost electric vehicle, at half the cost of its current best selling EVs? What will it be called? A T2? And when will it be launched.
The approaching Tesla investor day in early March, and the company’s industry leading profit margins on its top selling Model 3 and Model Y EVs has rekindled speculation that Tesla can, and maybe will, unveil a new EV platform with a low cost, truly mass market EV in the future.
Tesla is not giving much away. During its Q4 earnings call last week, CFO Zach Kirkhorn told investors that Tesla is “continuing to ensure funding is prioritised for our long term roadmap”.
Kirkhorn went on to say this includes “development of our next generation vehicle platform” and that Tesla would be discussing these plans in more detail during its investor day, which is scheduled for March 1.
During Tesla’s Q3 earnings call in October last year, CEO Elon Musk revealed that the new platform will be smaller in size than the Model 3/Model Y platform. He also said that will cost the same to produce two units of the next-gen Tesla vehicle as it currently costs to produce a single Model 3.
From The driven
Given that they have such a big margin on sales, why would Tesla cannibalise that profit to make smaller cars?
Unless of course they have reached the point where the majority of those who would buy an EV have been satisfied, and now they have to compete on price with the entry level ICE cars.
They also have the Tesla Semi and Cybertruck about to commense production, are they going to be able to spread their people assets over so much area?
Mick
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?