- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 19,983
- Reactions
- 12,495
And it still has the overwhelming majority of passenger transport provided by cars,
Public transport has a place but it’s the equivalent of running this forum via articles in a print edition newspaper. All OK as long as your investments are buy and hold index funds or within the top 10 stocks but that’s where it ends.
Biggest problem with public transport in Australian cities is it assumes everyone wants to go to the CBD when in practice that’s a destination of diminishing relevance to which plenty have zero need to visit.
A far more typical transport journey is to a shopping centre or it’s taking the kids to play sport or it’s taking the dog to the vet or it’s visiting friends in another suburb. Public transport fails at all of those.
It has a place certainly but it’s not an alternative to cars outright or even for the majority. Cars and PT are both here to stay.
Transport of all types is being diminished by technology, eg zoom meetings, online ordering, general working from home arrangements, internet banking etc.
You can look at houses with virtual tours these days, which will eliminate a lot of those you don't like and you just travel to the ones you do.
I can see private public transport operators feeling the squeeze as time goes on, and governments will probably be running PT at a loss or more of a loss than they are now.
People will still want cars for recreation and as you pointed out , public transport is not usually an option unless you want to travel lost distances.