This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Electric cars?

Would you buy an electric car?

  • Already own one

    Votes: 10 5.1%
  • Yes - would definitely buy

    Votes: 43 21.7%
  • Yes - preferred over petrol car if price/power/convenience similar

    Votes: 78 39.4%
  • Maybe - preference for neither, only concerned with costs etc

    Votes: 38 19.2%
  • No - prefer petrol car even if electric car has same price, power and convenience

    Votes: 25 12.6%
  • No - would never buy one

    Votes: 14 7.1%

  • Total voters
    198
Handy software update for the Tesla, downloading now. Other manufacturers are slowly catching up. Now we just need the infrastructure to catch up :-(

 
The power system is a hugely complex issue, far more complex than E.V's and also far more critical to society. Some of the smartest people in Australia will be working out how to best move forward, it won't be done on a forum.
I don't know the topography of the dam in question, but maybe there is the option of putting in more hydro at a later date and pumping the overflow to their dams.
Who knows but it probably isn't something that can't or won't be engineered out, it isn't problem at the moment because there is at call generation available, by the time the issue is a problem it will be resolved IMO.
 
Last edited:

National Press Club address: Q&A session

29 June 2022

Energy supply, emissions reductions, electric vehicles


GREG BROWN: Greg Brown from The Australian. Mr Bowen, Labor's pre election modelling assumes electric vehicles will account for 89% of new car sales by 2030, well above the former government's prediction based on their policies on 29%. Now, experts, including the Grattan Institute, say they can't see how this will be achieved based on Labor's already announced policy initiatives which you went through today, noting that free trade deals do make the tariff exemption largely redundant. So what is the assumption behind the massive growth in EV sales under Labor? And will the government need new policies in this space, such as vehicle emission standards, to make the 89% prediction a reality?

CHRIS BOWEN: Thanks, Greg. But to be clear, the assumptions in the modelling are just that. They're assumptions, they're not policy decisions in relation to those figures. So we didn't have a target of meeting, you know, any particular EV rate. So that's not a policy decision, that's what the modellers have worked through. Some of that will be natural increases; others will be as a result of policies. But we're very committed to increasing the penetration of electric vehicles and increasing the penetration of electric vehicles at an affordable rate. And there'll be a lot of flow-through impacts of our policies that we've already implemented - I mean in the process of implementing and have announced.
For example, one example, our commitment to take the Commonwealth fleet to, in the first instance, 75% no emissions: very important. One, because the Commonwealth has a big fleet, 10,000 cars. But, secondly, the Commonwealth turns over its cars every 3 years. That leads into the second-hand market. At the moment you can't buy a second-hand electric car in Australia and, as we all know, if you really want an affordable car it's almost certainly a second-hand car. So if you're in the market, if you're in the place of the market as many young people are, for example, buying their first car, they'd love an EV but you can't get one second hand.
When the Commonwealth fleet starts to roll through and we have the Commonwealth disposing of its electric vehicles in 3 years after they've been purchased, you start to get the second-hand market. Same with private fleets, our FBT discount and our tariff discount has its biggest impact, I'm happy to concede, on fleets. Again, big proportions of car sales in Australia are fleet. But again, they turn over, depending on the company, every two, three or four years. Flow through to second hand.
So there's a lot to do. And, yes, in relation to the second part of your question, we have an electric vehicle strategy which we will now develop in office, as we said we would from Opposition, and we'll consider further policy positions to add to and build on what we've already committed to.

GREG BROWN: So vehicle emissions standards, are they on the table as we move forward?

CHRIS BOWEN: We will consider all viable options to build on the policy announcements we have already made and are implementing.
 
Ok back to car,so that ICE car or hybrid you just bought,are you really going to save the planet because you ae going to put it in a scrapyard in 5y even some Green rabid PHD in social science must have some doubt..probably not.
Here come e fuel ....
Sure,you will not give extra money to China, will not dig more holes and will still enable the toothless/peon to travel and clog the roads and airports annoying the super-rich but you will be co2 emission (balance) free...if that is part of your belief,and more importantly in my opinion,you will be able to run an economy different from middle age without burning precious diseappearing oil resources.
From their ABC
 
"Australian battery industry research is set to take a significant step forward" About time, we have everything here except the commitment. A massive battery manufacturing industry here could set us up for all sorts of manufacturing industries for decades, but it will only work if all involve commit to it 100%, including government.

I'm not convinced, though I hope.

 
'Watts Under the Bonnet' - Is range anxiety an outdated concern?

 
Now this sounds like a nice EV, whether you are a petrol head or not, but you need deep pockets.
 

Certainly an interesting read. One has to check out the performance figures for the Lucid air in the story. They are mindblowing..
What did catch my eye on Car and Driver however was this piece. A restoration work that overrides the original manufacturer.

This Peugeot 604 Is One Man's Obsessive Restoration

Harjeet Kalsi wasn't afraid to tackle the obscure French luxury car—after all, he'd already done an Aston Martin Lagonda.

By Brendan McAleer

Jul 3, 2022

View Photos


John Brendan McAleerCar and Driver

Manufacturing the “turbodiesel” badge affixed to the back of this 1984 Peugeot 604 took Harjeet S. Kalsi two full weeks. With painstaking precision, he recreated the original font, milling a single thin piece of aluminum, micron by micron. Prototypes were made and discarded. He then mixed two batches of resin, getting the tint just right before pouring them into the millimeters-deep cavity. The excess was carefully hand-sanded away, and the piece then buffed to a spotless sheen. That's how much effort went into just the badge.

 
An interesting concept. It could work, but pricing will have to be at the premium end of the market and cost of doner stock will be a problem.

Developing a cutting-edge facility for converting any pre-1996 vehicle to electric power

 

 
I wondered when the Federal Govt would say "hang on a minute, you State Govts are taking over our fuel excise tax", it has taken a while for the penny to drop.?
Not the sharpest tools in the shed.

From the article:

The Commonwealth collects around $12 billion in fuel tax every year, but that will gradually shift to state coffers if more motorists adopt electric vehicles and states levy their own distance-based user charges.
 

Well, we knew it had to happen, EV drivers can't expect to get off scot free, but it's a bit of a hoot watching Federal and States slug it out over who gets the revenue.

Maybe they should take it to National Cabinet and agree to a 50/50 split.
 
Well, we knew it had to happen, EV drivers can't expect to get off scot free, but it's a bit of a hoot watching Federal and States slug it out over who gets the revenue.

Maybe they should take it to National Cabinet and agree to a 50/50 split.
Ev’s don’t get off entirely scot free.

1, we still pay rego.
2, we still pay GST on electricity purchases.
3, we produce extra profit for the government by adding demand to state owned electricity infrastructure.

And probably the best part.

4, we lower air pollution which costs the government Many billions per year, a cost that ICE car owners get off Scot free on.
 

Fair point on emissions.

Extra profit for government ?

EV owners will be adding to demand for power alright which is where we already have a problem that infrastructure isn't keeping up with demand.

EV's are a tiny bit of the problem at the moment, but there are governments that will be dreading a rapid takeup of EV's because they know that the infrastructure isn't there to support it and it will cost billions.
 

Yep, up here in Queensland the government still owns a fair bit of electricity infrastructure, and they have already mentioned that the higher utilisation of these assets will increase the profits generated by them, This would be the same in other states too, especially Tasmania.

As we have discussed before, if the extra demand from EV’s is applied to the grid during times when low demand normally causes the network to be unprofitable, this higher demand / increased utilisation is very good for the grids profitability,

Building more infrastructure will cost billions, but it will also generate billions in revenue, and as discussed a decent chunk of the extra demand will be met with exisiting infrastructure that currently sits idle for many hours a day.
 
I guess a main point to remember is that the grid isn’t struggling to meet demand 24/7, the majority of the time there is a lot of excess capacity just sitting there doing nothing, that only exists to meet those couple of hours of peak demand.

If cars are charged over night after 10pm and before 6am they can use all that extra capacity that is doing nothing, this means the owners of that capacity which is some cases is the government, will get to put those assets to work earning money when otherwise they wouldn’t be earning anything, this not only helps the owners earn more from their existing assets but it also helps reduce the cost of running the grid, because it doesn’t cost anything extra to use some of this infrastructure such as transmission lines, but their running costs can be spread across a larger customer base on a per unit basis.

See the peak in demand in the chart below, that’s the peak in demand when you can say the grid might struggle, but it’s only at that peak for 2 hours or so, either side of that peak is a lot of opportunity space to charge cars easily, without putting extra stress on the grid but instead actually increasing its profits and incentivising more investment.

 
EVs will have to compete with a lot of other off peak devices as appliances get smarter. Clothes driers, dishwashers, washing machines as well as hot water systems, so the off peak time is going to get more crowded as time goes on.
 
he UK show , Fully Charged, has released a video aimed at Australian watchers, extolling the virtues of the BYD Atto3.
Interestingly, he looks at what the average bread and butter vehicle owners might be lookng far, as distinct from what the well heeled owners might expect.
Mick
 
EVs will have to compete with a lot of other off peak devices as appliances get smarter. Clothes driers, dishwashers, washing machines as well as hot water systems, so the off peak time is going to get more crowded as time goes on.
All those devices you named are already being used extensively, if some of them switch to being used during off peak times, then that will open up more capacity during the traditional peak times.

Hot water systems switch on at about 10pm or 11pm depending on where you are, and finish in heating in about 2 hours so still plenty of time to charge cars, also more hot water heating will probably begin to occur during the solar power peak times, that’s when I heat mine.

Not to mention that the growth in home batteries will also take away peak hour demand, eg homes with batteries will be drawing zero from the grid during peak times, as they would have a full battery by the time people get home from work and starting cooking.

————————

Also, a major thing will begin to happen I believe.

As the traditional off peak times begin to see growing demand, producing electricity during these times will become more profitable. This will be a massive incentive for companies to invest in more wind power assets, because at the moment excess wind power during these times is not sold at a profitable price.

So increasing demand during offpeak times increases the number of hours each day wind project owners will potentially be profitable which will incentivise them to build more, which will also add to peak capacity as well.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...