- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
Pretty sure buffet would agree building a giant battery factory + building huge car plant + building a global charging network + opening new stores all over the world + doing r & d on new products are all investing.
The guy said investors would keep investing as long as things continued to look promising, which if you have actually liked at the details you would see they are.
Tesla is at that stage where everything it does could be considered both operating and investing.
Where to put the expense is just management's decision to claim back R&D subsidies and looking not-so-bad on investor's roadshow.
I'm obviously no accountant but if I were in the car manufacturing business, I'd classified by first car manufacturing plant as an operating expense rather than an investing activity. I mean, without that plant I wouldn't be able to operate my main activity of manufacturing, right?
Expanding on that plant, getting rid of perfectly usable robots with better ones for efficiency... Those I'd considered investing.
I read Buffett saying that if he teaches investing and ask students to value any dot.com company and they come back with a number, he'd flunk them.
Why? I'm guessing that it's because they're burning cash like it's other people's money, and there's always more of it.
-------------
I don't know how Tesla will work out, neither are many other investors, including that guy in the video. But Tesla is trying to change the world, taking on everybody and their politicians... and all from simply using bankers and investors' cash.
A manufacturing business cannot keep doing that for too long.
Think about it. Tesla is up against the car manufacturers, their parts suppliers; up against the world's charging networks of refill stations and all those logistic companies; it's up against the oil industry.
How many jobs, how much money does all that industry have and would be at risk?
You can't take on all that with investors and bankers cash alone. You'd need the gov't. And the gov't not only has the car, the oil, the supply chains up their azz, they also have voters whose jobs are also at risk.
Why in the world would any gov't support a factory that's mainly robotics (won't be hiring much, making more idle hands to cause social unrest)...
Then top that off with car manufacturers all over the world announcing the drive to EV.
Those guys have the cash, the assets, the experience, the brain power, the logistics, the know-how, the political influence... did I mention they also have positive cash flow (most of the time)?
Musk better grow up and learn to share the market potential of Tesla with other partners. By the look of it he want to operate that Apple model of excluding everyone else.
I mean, complaining about Tesla having to be in a JV if it want to operate in China? Come on Elon, if you want 100% ownership, how will the Chinese steal your ideas and IPs? How will the princlings make their billions? How will the Communist Party get you to influence certain policies in Washington?