- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,438
The messages keep coming through and the discreditations follow.
Well here is another one to discredit. How we can end the lockdown in 6wks and never re-enter and how to protect ourselves in the future.
First problem there is knowing who is healthy in that sense and who isn't?So why not let healthy people get exposed?
"We think the penis also could be affected in a similar way," Ramasamy said. "We don't think this is a temporary effect. We think this could be permanent."
I agree that in principle giving people a minimally tested vaccine is far from ideal and under normal circumstances ought not be done.by the way many urging caution on this vaccine are health professionals with some actually working in the vaccine industry
The messages keep coming through and the discreditations follow.
Well here is another one to discredit. How we can end the lockdown in 6wks and never re-enter and how to protect ourselves in the future.
I am sorry Smurf, this is really typical of someone who is not aware of reality.First problem there is knowing who is healthy in that sense and who isn't?
Second problem is how to separate the healthy from the rest and enable society to function?
Third problem is that even healthy people seem to suffer ongoing effects if they get it.
With regard to the third, as a man I'd prefer to not become impotent as just one example: https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210513/coronavirus-lingers-in-penis-and-could-cause-impotence#1
That's quoting university researchers in the US not some political group.
Add that to lung damage, heart damage, headaches and all the rest plus the reality that for those countries that did go down that track, the death toll has been rather large.
So unless your son is unusually conservative in lifestyle and intends not having sex in the future, getting COVID seems to not be a particularly good idea.
From an economic perspective, well the logical long term conclusion of that is it reduces future population which, from an economic perspective, has definite downsides. Perhaps good for the environment but not for GDP.
For your information @Smurf1976 , there is only ONE track record of an mRNA vaccine, which so far has killed 600 children in the Philippines:I agree that in principle giving people a minimally tested vaccine is far from ideal and under normal circumstances ought not be done.
This is however not a normal circumstance since the problem needing to be fixed is already in circulation. If the lion has already escaped from the zoo, the bridge has already collapsed or the ship really is sinking well then there's simply no option to do nothing and carry on business as usual.
In an ideal world I don't want a virus or a vaccine but, since there's choice to not have one or the other, I've chosen the vaccine based on the track record of vaccinations in general being the less bad option.
For the record I actually have talked to someone who's (just) under 60 and living in the UK.I am sorry Smurf, this is really typical of someone who is not aware of reality.
A bit like Australia trying to prepare for a snow storm ..try to talk to someone you know aged less than 60 and based in a country affected by covid/having had covid.
It is not a pro or against jab, it is pro or against forcing people not at risk of covid: . roughly below 60ish to be injected with a new tech relying on a genetic modification, sure not of your cells but a if i may say so a GM virus . As i am sure you know, a virus develops by tweeking your own body cells to reproduce the virusFor the record I actually have talked to someone who's (just) under 60 and living in the UK.
Admittedly a tiny sample of one person but their message was pretty blunt - suffice to say they're very firmly in favour of vaccination.
Have a look at what was going on in the UK before mass vaccination versus after it. It's night versus day. Vaccination has claimed a few lives yes but the death rate from COVID has gone from huge to trivial. End result is the UK economy is opening up without a spike in deaths meanwhile in Australia we're still locking down.
To my understanding life in the UK is considerably closer to normal right now than it is in Sydney or Melbourne in particular. Economically, it's hard to see that not being a negative for Australia, big cities especially.
In Australia for sure as it is our first wave and we are sitting duck with nor facility increases.so jabbed or not...I think there is a very real chance that the real second wave has now begun, Delta and what will follow it may end up doing more damage than everything that has come before it.
I am guilty as hell but this should go back to the economic side: lockdowns effects on business,our RBA buying our own debt at the rate of $200 a week per man,woman kid and infant to pay for it, the serious hit on our competitivity now and future due to travel bans...I think these lockdowns will affect our future by removing motivation to create new businesses..who would start a new cafe restaurant after this mess? Even a var service,an international startup..ok self interest here A whole generation burnt turning to PS jobs..or is it the aim?
To my understanding life in the UK is considerably closer to normal right now than it is in Sydney or Melbourne in particular. Economically, it's hard to see that not being a negative for Australia, big cities especially.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?