- Joined
- 28 December 2013
- Posts
- 6,392
- Reactions
- 24,319
I think that it would. If you stay out of bad markets for the system, its outperformance in good markets should remain. In aggregate you improve the systems performance.
Read back over some of your own posts re. learning new skills, study, etc. LOL.
@ducati916, I see your point. It's similar to what my neighbour said to me the other day. He commented that I've put on a few kilos and suggested I exercise and cut down on food to lose weight.
but what is a 'bad market' in March 2020 i was like a kid in a toy-shop with a pocketful of cash ( and half wishing a had half a million more in cash ) .. too many choices not enough eyes to watch them with ,It made me think
"Why didn't I think of that?" It's a simple yet effective solution to a problem that, if implemented, will produce results. Similarly, your suggestion to stay out of bad markets makes sense. By avoiding unfavourable conditions, the system's performance should improve considerably. I'm sure this practical approach will make a difference.
Good afternoon Divs4everbut what is a 'bad market' in March 2020 i was like a kid in a toy-shop with a pocketful of cash ( and half wishing a had half a million more in cash ) .. too many choices not enough eyes to watch them with ,
to me early 2019 was a 'bad market ' nothing attractive to buy ( no good reason to buy 'reverse index' ETFs back then either , and worse still interest rates were anemic )
very much a case of knowing where your strengths are ( volatile markets , long trends , etc. etc etc )
good luck
possible exchange and/or platform mal-functions and glitchesI also ask: why would a Systems Trader sell Systems that aren't able to deal with a possible Market Crash?
I note that Nick Radge has stated that he has turned off his Systems and is in Cash due to expectations of a possible impending Crash. While I have my doubts about his reasoning, I also ask: why would a Systems Trader sell Systems that aren't able to deal with a possible Market Crash?
Secondly, his Regime Filter seems inappropriate to predict a possible Market Crash. I de-followed him long ago as he seems too much of a self promoter or Businessman of selling all things to do with Trading. I guess I'll receive threats of Legal Action from him, like another Poster in this Thread, or the usual encouragement of Flaming by others associated with him, but can anyone shed light on my questions above please.
I ask: why would a Systems Trader sell Systems that aren't able to deal with a possible Market Crash?
Thank you for the response.possible exchange and/or platform mal-functions and glitches
having been entangled in such issues ( mainly on Commsec ) i have thoroughly tested the patience and skills of Commsec support team , for up to two hours at a time ( at least they don't automatically block my calls )
HOWEVER i am almost completely a small retail investor , so if i can get jammed up by massive market movements , what chance a professional trader who does trades in the realm of hundreds of times more than me ( in both $$value and quantity of trades needing execution )
sometimes crises happen outside of your computers/internet provider , maybe Nick is just being extra cautious
I note that Nick Radge has stated that he has turned off his Systems and is in Cash due to expectations of a possible impending Crash. But going to Cash as a Systems Trader everytime things look precarious seems overkill.
Thank you for the response.
Successful Traders I know and Institutions have multiple Accounts on different Power Grids, ISPs etc so if one goes down they can switch to the backup. I'm even prepared for that to some degree.
But going to Cash as a Systems Trader everytime things look precarious seems overkill. He moves in and out faster than most people too I assume, its automated.
It was very evident on Wednesday night that the Instos were accumulating, Thursday night a very small bit of Red, then Friday night another Rally. How he didn't see that at least on Thursday morning is beyond me.
Thanks SkateHitting the Pause Button
Even an experienced trader who has enjoyed profitable periods in the past has incurred huge losses over the last 18 months. It just goes to prove that even experienced skilled professionals like Nick Radge demonstrate that no one is immune to changing conditions. I note that @Alexander2023 remarked that Nick Radge has turned off his systems and is in cash due to expectations of a possible impending crash. While going to cash may be a prudent move, it's worth considering whether this approach is necessary or appropriate for a Systems Trader.
Sustaining an Ongoing Massive Drawdown
Seeing traders like Nick Radge incur huge drawdowns highlights the risk of relying solely on historical strategy performance. Markets can quickly turn against us, and even the most reliable strategies can fail. If I were facing similar mounting losses while declaring "All my strategies remain well within tested boundaries," without adapting or taking steps to mitigate risk, you'd be justified in questioning my judgment.
Skate.
Secondly, his Regime Filter seems inappropriate to predict a possible Market Crash. The Regime Filter he mentioned seems quite "interesting" for Trading those small Caps. It would appear it puts him in buying Laggards too, in my opinion. The possibility exists that he's using old Data and Strategies that don't work in changing Markets?
He's focused too much on the Business and not on staying on top of his Game?
Greetings Nick,Dear me...really? FFS, the ignorance here is astounding.
@Alexander2023
Wow - 3 posts and 3 attacks. How's the credibility...
Please explain where I have ever stated there is an impending crash? I have used Regimne Filters for over 20-years and the research that backs them up as useful tools are extensive. My portfolios constantly move between being fully invested and cash. They have done so for decades. It's no secret and I have written extensively about it.
@ divs4ever There are no adjustments to my strategies. They're all well within their tested boundaries.
@ Skate "Seeing traders like Nick Radge incur huge drawdowns.."
This is nothing more than an emotional comment and the precise reason why the exercise was run. My drawdown, in percentage terms, is a little over 20%. I think you, or anyone will be hard-pressed to find any trader on the planet that hasn't had a 20% drawdown at some stage. It happened in 2011 and again in 2018. Even so, my long term CAGR, even as at today, still stands at some +23%.
"I'm sure Nick is currently doing a bit of soul-searching to establish if he could have done better while sticking with the long game."
Or perhaps someone in my family is quite ill and I'm taking some time to deal with that.
@ Skate "Seeing traders like Nick Radge incur huge drawdowns.."
My drawdown, in percentage terms, is a little over 20%.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?