- Joined
- 28 December 2013
- Posts
- 6,392
- Reactions
- 24,319
My current thinking of identifying emerging uptrends
The core buy logic is straightforward - buy if the closing price breaks above the prior 20-bar lowest low plus twice the 10-bar Average True Range (ATR). This aims to identify closing prices breaking out above recently established support levels, signaling the potential start of an uptrend. The ATR component adapts the support breakout trigger to evolving volatility conditions. Wider breaks are required during volatile markets, while smaller breaks suffice in calmer conditions.
Much appreciated Mr Skate, I would be keen to check it and do an implementation, but the farm is still on sale and bank accounts to survival mode: I have no cash for strategies so even my trusted reliable one is off.@qldfrog, I hope others duplicate the "Dual Breakout Strategy" for further evaluation. I'm impressed with the initial result (and I'm not easily impressed) and with a few moving parts the strategy should be easy to replicate for those interested,
Skate,
Have you tried growing some Turmeric in the mean time?Much appreciated Mr Skate, I would be keen to check it and do an implementation, but the farm is still on sale and bank accounts to survival mode: I have no cash for strategies so even my trusted reliable one is off.
We change agent in the following weeks so hopefully we will have a break, a sale, and be involved again.
Just hope that by that time, and among the mayhem, I do remember this exchange.
The Problem with Back tests is that they are not in Real Time
We have to Buy at the Sellers price
With @Joe Blow's approval, I think this thread could provide a transparent case study. We could paper trade the "Dual Breakout Strategy" in real-time and log detailed results.
To be clear, this would be an educational exercise - not a signal service. The goal would be to show the process of transitioning a backtest to live trading. Tracking real-time paper trading performance could demonstrate how execution impacts results compared to simulated backtests.
I have no problem with a live trading exercise as set out by Skate above. To be clear to all those reading, such an exercise would be for the purpose of an educational case study only and not a signal service. A lot can be learned from a live trading exercise such as this and I hope that it proves to be an interesting and educational experiment.
Tracking real-time paper trading performance could demonstrate how execution impacts results compared to simulated backtests.
The live logs could include:
(a) Entry price versus backtest price
(b) Slippage on exits
(c) Execution delays
(d) Actual fill prices
Skate, how are you going to calculate slippage and actual fill prices on a paper trading account?
The problem with paper trading is that it does not account for these things.
The problem with paper trading
We have plenty of turmeric actually captain.Sorry Capn Stakes
The Problem with Back tests is that they are not in Real Time
We have to Buy at the Sellers price
Have you tried growing some Turmeric in the mean time?
Bit of a Slow Learner - No wonder she BoltedWomen are so cryptic
I came home this morning to a note from my wife on the front door "above the door handle" which read:
"I've tried and I've tried but this isn't working anymore, I'm sorry"
Bloody hell
I can't find anything wrong with the door handle and now I can't find my wife to ask what's wrong with it?"
Skate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?