- Joined
- 24 December 2005
- Posts
- 2,601
- Reactions
- 2,065
All good.
Discretionary
6/10 at 3R wins
4/10 at .7R losses
Pretty tough I know!
Systematic
4/10 at 5.6 R wins and
6/10 a5 1 R losses
Tough again but long and short trading I’m happy.
Others may do better.
I’ve not seen any of your trades Ann so can’t comment on your trading ability.
You seem to have a good handle on vanilla T/A
Well you've beaten me.I have a privacy issue as I use my real first name
While Skate, I'm sure is quite capable of defending himself if he so chose, I will do so as in my short time of reading his posts I have found him to be exceptionally polite and patient.
Also there are some rather obvious lessons to be learned.
So:
"I was not expecting a diatribe from you just a simple response. "
I suggest you look up the meaning of the underlined word.
"Addressing me by name once is sufficient, twice is permissible any more than that sounds condescending. Avoid over using someone's name, it is rude and sounds manipulative."
I would disagree.
As a 'trader' you are self-employed. You are a 'business', unless you are employed to trade for someone [bank/hedge fund/etc].
On a bigger picture basis: without those who engage in business, we are back to hunting/gathering. Only through specialisation/diversification of production can we continue to consume: which by definition means someone has to create and run businesses. If you are an 'employee' you are employed by a business owner.
"I learnt from my father running your own business was totally rdiculous and not worth the effort."
Such a generalisation is both ill-informed and disrespectful to those that do.
"Loans are poison, you dance to another man and the economies tune.
When the relationship breaks down, often your family have no where else to go and no means to leave because all your assets are 'in the business'."
A 'loan' is a tool like any other. It can be prudent, it can be dangerous. Again, simply a generalisation without merit.
"Bingo, that is my #1 FA indicator for a strong business. See FA isn't so hard if you think about it Skate!"
As has been demonstrated on another thread, recognising legitimate cash-flow from simply cash-flow, is not as straightforward as one might imagine.
"There are some emotions I can't feel. Fear is one of them, it just converts to the feeling of power. I quite welcome failure, it is a great teacher."
Possibly you are unique in the human race.
"If you have fear, you clearly don't have confidence you know what you are doing. If you don't know what you are doing, don't trade."
Skate is referring to a 'business', not to trading. Even if it were 'trading' as a business, if you have quit your job, have taken your savings/loan/whatever and undertaken the business of trading, if your trade expectancy is below that initially contemplated and the rent/mortgage/bills/etc are due [as they always are], I would argue it is only natural to feel stress/fear.
I would seriously consider tendering an apology to Skate.
Yeh I know what you mean
Try being a Duck!
Near 100% wins from the stocks you pick.
You seriously have the holy grail keep it very
Very close - that I’m sure is a certainty.
I bow to the best results a trader has ever mentioned.
Using vanilla T/A at that.
To be honest from your postings I’d have never picked it!
1. duc I now what diatribe means, it has several meanings and Skate is sufficiently eloquent to know them as well....amongst others, criticism, stricture, reproof, reproval, reprimand, rebuke, admonishment, admonition. This is how it sounded to me. A subjective interpretation based on the abnormal over-use of my name and not once answering a simple question of a few words with an equal simple response of a few words but basically saying I had no idea what I was talking about when none of the subjects where mentioned in my original simple question.
2. I have no problem if someone wishes to run a business for themselves. I have always loved being an employee, it is awesome.
3. I believe I have a right to express how I feel about running a business from the experiences I went through living with my father, watching him swindle decent people out of their money and then turning his back on their pleadings. I am speaking about myself and my own experiences, where is that ill-informed or disrespectful?
4. I lived with debt and its consequences all my childhood and came away with an abhorrence of debt in any form. Again I feel you are being unjust when I am explaining something to someone about my feelings and experiences to accuse me of 'a generalisation without merit'.
5. No not at all. I would be one of those blokes who leaps over the wall into enemy fire to save a mate. There are ship loads of us.
6. If a person is not 100% confident trading and finds it fearful and stressful, I would strongly recommend they get another source of income, preferably working for someone else.
7. Go right ahead duc!
1. I have read [some] of Skate's posts. Invariably they are polite and well meaning. Any error of interpretation lies with the reader.
2. Unfortunately, that is not what was expressed.
3. Yes you have a right to express anything personal to yourself. No argument. That is however not what you did: you took your personal position and extrapolated it onto everyone else. That is disrespectful to those that are self-employed and run legitimate businesses.
4. Same argument as above.
5. And if you spoke to those people [most, if not all] would state that they were afraid while doing so. Bravery is overcoming the fear, not an absence of fear.
6. Which totally misses the point re. starting a business.
7. I will, apologies Skate for diluting your thread with off-topic issues.
jog on
duc
And this returns you an almost 100% hit rate
Coupled with vanilla T/A
Impressive I doubt anyone else could do that!
Ann, would you please be kind enough to re-post your hyperlinked post in its entirety here in the 'Dump it here' thread please - others reading this thread would find your post very interesting, I'm sure of that. (this is what the 'Dump it here' thread is all about - educational material for beginners)They certainly could Tech/a, anyone. I have put up how I enter a stock on FMG. https://www.aussiestockforums.com/posts/1009612/
It is pretty much always the same way, not necessarily right at the bottom of a stock, it can be anywhere along the left side of the chart, same principles apply. It is basic, simple charting sticking to the KISS principle. For short sales, go to the right and read it in reverse.
That link is its entirety Skate, it links to my post from both my post here and your post where you just quoted my post. But this whole thing appears to be turning into a pissing contest and that is something I have avoided for the last 13 odd years I have been here. There should only ever be one guru per stockmarket forum otherwise it just confuses the punters who to follow! It sure the hell isn't going to be me.Ann, would you please be kind enough to re-post your hyperlinked post in its entirety here in the 'Dump it here' thread please - others reading this thread would find your post very interesting, I'm sure of that. (this is what the 'Dump it here' thread is all about - educational material for beginners)
Skate.
That link is its entirety Skate, it links to my post from both my post here and your post where you just quoted my post. But this whole thing appears to be turning into a pissing contest and that is something I have avoided for the last 13 odd years I have been here. There should only ever be one guru per stockmarket forum otherwise it just confuses the punters who to follow! It sure the hell isn't going to be me.
.....Love Peter2 and another great poster who was wonderfully patient trying to teach me the Elliot Wave....Porper. These guys are great! Always stop to read them if they pop up.Sorry Ann, your post is very valuable for the 'Dump it here' thread as its gives an insight how others trade - there is no right or wrong method when it comes to trading, what works for you might not work for others, it's for the reader to decide.
Instead or contesting your method of trading it would be better for others to explain an alternative, or their methodology when it comes to their trading style - as peter2 has done in his thread.
Skate.
The thing is Tech/a, I don't want to be revered. I leave that for others with a greater need than myself.Ann
If you make a claim expect to be
Taken up on it.
No pissing contest.
I’m just looking for evidence that vanilla T/A can return near to 100%
Winning trades.
In 25 years countless hrs with Quants a fair circle of professional traders
Directly and in directly —- your claim is at 180 degrees to everyone in the field of trading.
Your claim —— if you can’t back it up why make it in the first place?
Why make statements like you wouldn’t trade with % wins like I report or indeed 50%.
Those types of statements warrant further investigation and a trader with such an amazing result is to be revered if they can demonstrate it.
We will all learn
So please go ahead!
Well life is just full of little disappointments and bullsh!t Tech/a. It is up to all of us to gain from others where we may.Very disappointing.
I really thought there was another T/A
On this forum who had something of value to contribute.
Unfortunately claims like yours give T/A a bad name.
Particularly when claims/methods cannot be substantiated.
It just makes it look like bullshite.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?