- Joined
- 13 February 2006
- Posts
- 5,278
- Reactions
- 12,158
Timing the markets versus time in the markets
It's often said that timing the market rarely works, however trading this way can be profitable. There is also an alternative that can be just as profitable "over time". I'm saying, having a combination of both can smooth out your returns. Staying invested instead of trying to time the market, particularly for those looking for long-term returns is a proven & effective option to grow your wealth. The biggest benefit of staying fully invested alleviates the pressure to consistently time the market. Timing the markets during difficult times is a big ask & nearly impossible to do all the time.
Staying invested is less stressful
Historically, over time the markets tend to rise, generating better than shabby returns. Being always invested means you can ride out the downward volatility of market corrections as quality companies tend to shine after periods like those at present. I’m not saying that you can take your eye off the ball but rather you can enjoy capital appreciation without worrying about every gyration the market throws at you to shake you out.
Traders sell when investors hold
Investors may be tempted to sell stocks during downward volatility where traders generally do, which in the long run may not be in a trader's best interest. While selling during downward volatility can reduce stress & hopefully avoid deeper losses, could mean locking in losses & missing the market’s inevitable rebound. Whether you elect to invest or elect to trade is one of those personal decisions. Personally, I tend to do both.
Skate.
If 'time in' the market, selection of class or classes is important.
There is a certain irony as i am currently in a dispute where i was closing a business relationship and invoicing less than half of the contractually signed due amount ..and it seems to have been seen as a sign of weakness and the invoice remains unpaid..so my post about debt collection...Whatever you do in life has to have meaning & it's the same when it comes to trading
Doing something without meaning tends to be unproductive that adds no real value to your life or to the life of others. If you take that philosophy & attitude of doing the best for others as a guiding principle of behaviour the favour will ultimately be returned to you in spades. Doing the best for others is really doing the best for yourself. Showing kindness & having an attitude of gratitude never goes astray.
@bigdog & @barney are such two members who kindly post information on a daily basis that's not only useful to me but I'm sure useful to others. I'm just saying, these two members post every day not for themselves but for the benefit of others. So, I want to take this opportunity to say publicly "thank you" to both of them. Skate.
And then around the election or soon after, the market bubble will burst, as bubbles always do, and will revert to its trend value, around half of its peak or worse, depending on what new ammunition the Fed can dig up.
. In 2014, Grantham provided this two-year outlook: And then around the election or soon after, the market bubble will burst, as bubbles always do, and will revert to its trend value, around half of its peak or worse, depending on what new ammunition the Fed can dig up.
I often look back to see if predictions come true & admittedly most are widely off the mark even when they made perfect sense at the time.
Macquarie reveals its 16-stock "recession-proof" defensive portfolio
- Consumer Staples: Coles Group (ASX:COL), Endeavour Group (ASX:EDV), Metcash (ASX:MTS)
- Infrastructure: Transurban (ASX:TCL), Origin Energy (ASX:ORG), Amcor (ASX:AMC), Orora (ASX:ORA)
- Healthcare: CSL (ASX:CSL), Ramsay Health Care (ASX:RHC), Resmed (ASX:RMD)
- Gold: Newcrest Mining (ASX:NCM), Northern Star (ASX:NST)
- Food: Graincorp (ASX:GNC), United Malt Group (ASX:UMG), Elders (ASX:ELD), and Costa Group (ASX:CGC)
The advantages of these big boys is they might fall by single digits whereas the volatile ones would play double digit or disappear .more a matter of survival than profitIt pays to read what others think
@Telamelo posted a link to an article where "Macquarie" reveals defensive stock that should be included in a recession-proof portfolio going on to discuss why asset allocation is important.
As a system trader
There are times when I dismiss articles that hold little interest when they express alternative views to mine, reading them IMO would be a sheer waste of time AFAIC. Confirmation bias is a weakness all traders fall into without realising. At the moment two threads are holding my interest for a few reasons that are worth checking out.
SYI - SPDR MSCI Australia Select High Dividend Yield Fund
VAS - Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
So how can we take advantage of a portfolio of stock the big boys publish?
The small list of Macquaries' defensive portfolio posted above has 5 sectors with a total of 16 companies. Under normal trading situations, these quality shares lack volatility without the power of percentages due to their price. Admittedly, they are not the positions I'm chasing to achieve better than average returns for those two reasons as well as others. Well, after saying this how can we capitalise on the positions Macquarie suggests?
Skate.
Reading alternative views is beneficial to what we learn. As with trading, there are so many variables. How I use an indicator can vary from the way someone else uses it. It's those variables that bring an indicator to life for your application.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?