IMO, there is a possibility that it's all bluff from Wilke and the indies. I wouldn't think they would ruin their day in the sun just because leadership changes. I think they would continue to prop labor up for as long as possible - they would have limited choices otherwise.
Wilke's has a personal agreement with Gillard, not the Labor Party.
Wilke's has a personal agreement with Gillard, not the Labor Party.
Couldn't agree more. He needs to produce some alternative to (a) the government's IR position which most business organisations are complaining about as being unfair and stifling productivity, and (b) to have something positive as a come back to the incessant charges of him wanting to bring back workchoices. As long as he simply denies any affection for workchoices, he is less than credible. He needs to cut off his critics with a clear policy for the Coalition.Abbott has only himself to blame. There are plenty of reasons why he should stand up to the imbalances of Fair Work Australia. Gillard and her union cabinet mates have given the unions a free rein, with productivity being the loser.
True. The point is made in The Weekend Australian that Malcolm Turnbull was forbidden to speak about the NBN. Why, for heaven's sake? Mr Turnbull is articulate and logical on this topic and his appearance in the media on this can only be positive for the party.I am aware that Abbott is trying to remain a small target, but he will have to step up to the plate sooner or later. He has to be seen to stand for something. At the moment he is gagging his frontbenchers who want to raise the subject.
I'm as keen as most here to see the end of the current woefully incompetent government, but I've yet to be convinced that Mr Abbott offers much of a replacement. I'm ready to be convinced otherwise, but it's going to take more than the repeated utterings of a 'great big new tax' to do that.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/..._wont_tell_you_her_tax_wont_stop_any_warming/JOURNALIST: Prime Minister, you said that you want the debate to be informed by facts, but twice there Lenore asked you what your advice was on the net effect of our action, taking into account action or lack of action in the rest of the world. Will you provide that fact?
PM: We’re one of the 20 biggest polluters on the planet. Per head of population, we are the biggest generator of carbon pollution per head of population in the developed world. That means we have to act.
Is the rest of the world acting? Well, we’ve been through those facts and figures before, and I’m happy to supply them all again, but, yes, the rest of the world is also acting on climate change and we can’t afford to be left behind.
Well, we’ve been through those facts and figures before, and I’m happy to supply them all again, but, yes, the rest of the world is also acting on climate change and we can’t afford to be left behind.
But final confirmation came when Russia, Japan and Canada officially told the G8 meeting of the world's leading economies in Deauville, France, at the weekend they would not join a post-Kyoto deal that does not include emissions reductions from developing countries such as China.
US President Barack Obama used the G8 dinner to confirm that like Kyoto Mark 1, the US is not interested in what has been seen as a Eurocentric global agreement.
The arrangement is being seen as confirmation that the Government traded off massive investment in alternative power sources to get Green concessions on a starting carbon price and on protection of polluting industries.
Does anyone really know what this Prime Minister of ours stands for?
I do know one thing, and that is, she does not appear to know what she is doing or does she?
I still believe she has a hidden agenda and it's not good.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...or-julia-gillard/story-e6frerdf-1226081562543
Hi.
Of all the posts that I have read, plus all the articles from the media, the above post is so accurate "it's not funny".
On Sunday we are going to hear something about the carbon tax.
Will it be the complete story?
Will it be a front for another hidden agenda?
If I was to choose what the hidden agenda was, I would say that at the end of the Gillard government, the tax, come grants, come rebate, come money management of the Australian government will be in such a mess that it will take some time to unravel.
I think the hidden agenda is to destroy the audit system of government money management. Gillard has money going here, going there, plucking billions from nowhere to chuck somewhere.
Does anybody actually believe that Swan understands the money trail?
Please don't answer yes.
It will never be "all revieled".
joea
But as well as Abbott's untiring anti-tax campaign, Sunday will also mark the start of the Greens' efforts to differentiate themselves from Labor, with claims about what they achieved in the carbon tax deal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?