This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Did you know?

Nectarines and peaches with the sticker Zee Sweet are genetically modified ?
 
Nectarines and peaches with the sticker Zee Sweet are genetically modified ?

Where did you get this from? I grew up in a region where all forms of stone fruit are grown and i can assure you Zee Sweet have been around for at least a decade, probably more, a long time before GM. Zee Sweet is nothing more than a variety of nectarine.

You might be confused witht he fact that nectarines are a 'man made' fruit, being the result of cross breeding between a plum and a peach. They would not exist in nature had it not been for breeding by mankind
 

Smeone told me they saw a TV doco exposing the food industry, apparently Zee Sweet modify their fruit to make it bigger faster etc, the food industry is akin to the tobacco industry , not very nice.
 
Smeone told me they saw a TV doco exposing the food industry, apparently Zee Sweet modify their fruit to make it bigger faster etc, the food industry is akin to the tobacco industry , not very nice.

LOL my sisters brothers cousin saw something on TV. I am assuming they are talking about the doco Food Inc? Which is actually a good documentary but i cant remember it mentioning anything about Zee Sweet

But as far as Zee Sweet goes it is simply a licensed necatrine variety, as are thousands of other types of fruit. Depending what definition you use you could consider all varieties of nectarines to be GM, although it is all done through breeding, and nothing in a lab.

With no links and/or evidence this is just classic mis-information same as all those magnificent current affairs programs.
 
Smeone told me they saw a TV doco exposing the food industry, apparently Zee Sweet modify their fruit to make it bigger faster etc, the food industry is akin to the tobacco industry , not very nice.

My neighbour's sister's brother-in law operated a dry-cleaning business. One of his regular customers showed him his winning ticket in a Nigerian lottery sweepstake, worth $10 Million. He must have cashed it in because he never came back again to have any more dry-cleaning done.
 
Actually Food Inc. mostly covers corn and soy beans, i can't recall any mention of fruit in terms of GMO.

Great Doco Food Inc. Indeed there have been many changes to the beef industry brought about by many activists.

Monsanto unfortunately is still up to their old tricks.

CanOz
 
Please don't put the mockers on seedless grapes Burnsie


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-katz-md/genetically-modified-foods_b_912096.html
 

Dont know what show it was, he was a tradesman I was waiting with outside a house, he was wearing a tie so I believed him.
Not sure if it was that show or not but I'll find out if I can.
 

Isn't any animal or plant that has been domesticated for human consumption or use genetically modified? Rhetorical question, but I guess I don't see what the whole brouhaha is about because the modification takes place in a lab instead of in a field.
 
Isn't any animal or plant that has been domesticated for human consumption or use genetically modified? Rhetorical question, but I guess I don't see what the whole brewhaha is about because the modification takes place in a lab instead of in a field.

It depends on the definition really. I dont know enough about GM/GMO to have a solid opinion either way but from my perspective if something has been bred through natural ways (ie two similar trees reproducing to make a slighty different fruit and or variety) that is fine. If something has been genetically engineered in a lab that couldnt happen 'naturally' (splicing fruit with jellyfish genes to make it glow in the dark or splicing rosemary genes into lamb to have pre-flavoured meat) then that has the potential to cause problems down the line imo.
 

About right, but who's going to tell you ?

Thats right - no one.

A guy I know once said "food doesn't have ingredients" think about it.
 
About right, but who's going to tell you ?

Thats right - no one.

A guy I know once said "food doesn't have ingredients" think about it.

Yes but a Zee Sweet nectarine is not GM unless you count breeding as GM.

I have heard that quote before and i think it is stupid. Pancakes are food, they have ingredients. Bread is food, that has ingredients. Any form of meal is 'food' and all meals have ingredients (be they good or bad). If you were to live by that quote you wouldn't be eating anything that was mixed or combined in any way...

A nectarine doesnt have ingredients, is that still food?
 

Food in the pure sense is meat, fish, eggs, butter anything not tampered with.

Nectarines ? sure as long as they haven't been manipulated with chemicals to grow faster and bigger.
 

Fair point. But most of the GM foods I read about are designed to help grow crops in harsh environments etc.

You can't feed the world on organic, free range food.
 
Fair point. But most of the GM foods I read about are designed to help grow crops in harsh environments etc.

You can't feed the world on organic, free range food.

Right but you and I don't have to eat it if we choose not to and are given the correct information about food/products and I dont think that will be forthcoming.
 
You might be confused with the fact that nectarines are a 'man made' fruit, being the result of cross breeding between a plum and a peach. They would not exist in nature had it not been for breeding by mankind

No plums involved, no crossbreeding... all peachy.


http://www.sciencenetlinks.net/sci_update.php?DocID=177
 
Fair point. But most of the GM foods I read about are designed to help grow crops in harsh environments etc.

You can't feed the world on organic, free range food.

I'm not so sure about that McLovin...Perhaps "you cannot feed the current diet to the world on organic free range food at the same price..." would be more accurate.


CanOz
 
Food in the pure sense is meat, fish, eggs, butter anything not tampered with.

Nectarines ? sure as long as they haven't been manipulated with chemicals to grow faster and bigger.

I would argue that butter is tampered with. It is after all altered milk...

What about cooking? That alters the structure of the proteins in food before we eat it, is that not manipulating 'food'? In fact one could say that cooking meat changes it from food to an ingredient if our previous quote was to be used...

What do you define as chemical manipulation? Is putting nitrogen (that has been used by the trees that should be there in the first place read farmed) back into the soil via fertiliser considered manipulation?
 
Perhaps "Whole Food" is what he's referring to?

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...