Dona Ferentes
Pengurus pengatur
- Joined
- 11 January 2016
- Posts
- 16,252
- Reactions
- 22,187
and how was it received ?CSL is holding its 2024 Research & Development Investor Briefing today commencing at 9.00am Australian Eastern Daylight Time. The PDF document is to big to upload but is an announcement today (22/10/24).
No, its the Australian Newspaper, biased, always pushing a line and sloppy.Do your own research.
it might be time to buy.
There are now a large number of Australian stocks with a direct exposure to the US election result including CSL, ResMed, Cochlear, Austal, Reece, QBE Insurance, Ansell, Aristocrat, Worley, Treasury Wine Estates, Flight Centre, Computershare and James Hardie.Macquarie analysts say a Trump Presidency would be more positive for those trading in the US because of Trump’s promises to cut the corporate tax rate from the current 21 per cent to 15 to 20 per cent.
DJ U.S. Tariffs Could Force Moves by Australian Med-Techs -- Market Talk |
| ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
Plus Trump is not the guy to be keen on bloodsuckers...bleeding poor neighbourhoods for a sandwich and make mega profits to share among woke 0.01% is only appealing to Fauci and Democrats .No, its the Australian Newspaper, biased, always pushing a line and sloppy.
Never good for Aussie companies when these things happen.
CSL is an Australian company and though they manufacture in the USA a lot of elements come from other parts of the world.
Also as a foreign company there will probably be special taxes.
DJ U.S. Tariffs Could Force Moves by Australian Med-Techs -- Market Talk
CSL $285.80 $2.41 (0.9%) $285.75$285.83
07 Nov 2024 14:53:15
22 Views View attachment 187566 0 comments
0353 GMT - Australia-listed drug and device makers may have to consider moving production due to potential tariffs by the incoming Trump administration, UBS analysts write in a note. They say that the likes of vaccine giant CSL, hearing-implant maker Cochlear, breath-tech provider ResMed and radiopharmaceutical developer Telix may have to consider the origin of various inputs and the location of production. Tariffs could motivate relocation of facilities to the U.S. but result in lower profitability for companies, they say. Protective-garment maker Ansell could benefit from tariffs on Chinese gloves, they add. (stuart.condie@wsj.com)
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
November 06, 2024 22:53 ET (03:53 GMT)
An interesting test of that theory would be to go back to a year (say 5 years ago), where it’s pe at the time would have made you think it was over valued. Then look at the actual growth that occurred between then and now and see whether it actually was over valued or whether the price was actually good value based on the growth that occurred.CSL is one of the perennially overvalued growth stocks on the ASX. In Australia because genuine mid and large cap growth stocks are so few they tend to sell at astronomical p.e. ratios often more than double the p.e. ratios of comparable companies in the U.S.A. or other markets.
$5.47 USD was the EPS for CSL in FY2024. in FY 2014 CSL generated EPS of $2.70 USD. It slightly more than doubled its EPS in 10 years. That is a EPS CAGR of around 7.5% per annum.An interesting test of that theory would be to go back to a year (say 5 years ago), where it’s pe at the time would have made you think it was over valued. Then look at the actual growth that occurred between then and now and see whether it actually was over valued or whether the price was actually good value based on the growth that occurred.
Genuine growth companies are not over valued just because the PE is high based on its current earnings, just like a low PE doesn’t mean a dying company is good value.
A companies growth possibility is part of its value.
It also is the type of company that many believe to be “recession proof”, some people would be willing to pay a much higher than normal PE for a company that does have decent growth, while also being “recession proof”.$5.47 USD was the EPS for CSL in FY2024. in FY 2014 CSL generated EPS of $2.70 USD. It slightly more than doubled its EPS in 10 years. That is a EPS CAGR of around 7.5% per annum.
A respectable growth rate to be sure but its not the type of growth rate that can justify such a high p.e. ratio. CSL is currently trading on a trailing p.e. ratio of around 35. A 7.5% growth rate doesn't justify that. I do not follow the company closely so maybe the next 10 years will generate more growth than the last 10 years so who knows. But just on the surface level it just does not seem attractive. I would say the valuation is to do with the fact that in Australia we have huge money flows due to compulsory superannuation etc but we have a limited pool of large cap growth companies and hence why the large cap growth stocks in Australia tend to trade at a premium to their international peers. Large cap growth stocks in Australia typically trade on higher multiples than large growth companies in the USA or Europe.
By the way CSL's share price has hardly moved in the last 5 years. 5 years ago it was around $261 today its around $285. It will likely be another 3 to 5 years of share price stagnation from now until the earnings finally catch up with the valuation. And yes to answer your question 5 years ago it was even more overvalued than today hence why the share price barely moved in 5 years.
While its not overly affected by a recession it still has various factors that cause it to have some level of earnings volatility (competition, regulation, product cycles, government health sector expenditure levels, etc). If you look at its history it does have occasional years when earnings decline.It also is the type of company that many believe to be “recession proof”, some people would be willing to pay a much higher than normal PE for a company that does have decent growth, while also being “recession proof”.
I don’t follow it closely either, these are just random thoughts.
Ouch! not a holder but on the side line.My financial advisor has notched up my confidence. We officially started our SMSF 3 weeks ago, my wife's and my compulsory super was cashed in and transferred to our new super. The advisor is wary of the market and we're just dipping our toes with small buys, keeping our powder dry.
I have the final say on the suggested buy.
Last week I mentioned CSL as an alternative. I was advised against it, for now, due to certain circumstances, it still has a way to go down before being ready to buy.
look at the price today.
View attachment 188013
Ouch! not a holder but on the side line.
I couldn't sell mine, would be up for too much tax.Same. I sold my CSL near the peak a few months ago, with the aim of buying near the low.
Is today the low? I'm waiting a bit longer.
I couldn't sell mine, would be up for too much tax.
Very wary.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?