Dona Ferentes
Abrió la caja, vio al gatito, y sonrió
- Joined
- 11 January 2016
- Posts
- 15,589
- Reactions
- 21,197
can't answer that..... however, I'm not buying (or selling). However, and thanks to a Tim Boreham article somewhere in this thread, he articulates why CSL is worthy. #s 3, 4 and 5 ring true. #2 is alsoHow does one determine a fair price for CSL? I have been hearing about CSL for a long time and realise what a high quality company it is, but every metric I've used points to it being overvalued by a wide margin.
I know people have been saying it looks expensive for years, but that does not necessarily mean it is not expensive now. So to all CSL holders, how would you determine if you are paying too much for this stock?
- CSL’s success can be boiled down to a number of factors – and well beyond the fact that four of the nine board members have Australia Day gongs.
- True, CSL is well managed and has had a notably stable executive team and board.
- The company has remained focused on its core areas of crucial life-saving plasma-derived products and flu vaccines. But it has also used its clinical starts to develop relevant adjacent products.
- CSL has not gone overboard on raising dilutive capital. After a spate of share buybacks there’s a modest 453 million shares on issue.
- The company is also willing to anticipate demand and spend on capacity ahead of time. It’s active in the lab and will spend well over $1bn on research and development this year.
- Finally, CSL has had a decent dose of luck, having long held an entrenched position and having benefited from weak competitors at times.