- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,663
- Reactions
- 7,514
Australia’s firm stance against wildlife markets could put the country on a collision course with the global health authority.
“We need to protect the world against potential sources of outbreaks of these types of viruses,” Mr Morrison said.
“It has happened too many times.”
Since when did using statistics to measure like vs like become the norm?Why not just call it Fake News from an Enemy of the People ?
That's what the Master Debater says every-single-time there is any criticism of his stunning, heroic 10/10 achievements in protecting the US from this gigantic hoax of a Chinese Communist/Democratic/WHO plot to undermine the eternal temporal authority of the Son of God.
This letter?Where is this letter?
I have read what it is supposed to ask, but it makes no sense given what was already known.
I have no doubt that governments lie. Ask the journalists in Australia investigating ADF coverups.
More often they just don't release what they don't think will make them look good.
Here, however, the idea that China has been tardy in responding to the novel coronavirus does not fit the actions they have taken. The idea that the WHO is complicit is plain dumb.
I will happily go through point by point issues, but not a raft of them at once.
Done.Now redo it based on % of population.
Thanks for posting.This letter?
Here's Ai Fen report that China kept censoring:
The doctors called into question human transmission in that December 30 chat.
This isn't just government telling lies. They happily make them disappear, while censoring any proof. CCP is not just another government. People need to open their eyes.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/china-coronavirus-whistleblowers-speak-out-vanish-2020-2?amp
You questioned the existence of the letter and if it had been sent December 31.Done.
Thanks for posting.
Can you advise what was being hidden as the letter repeats what was made public.
Shows US is roughly 14th from memory.
I said it did not make sense in terms of what was reported as being asked.You questioned the existence of the letter and if it had been sent December 31.
WHO and Taiwan are now arguing over the wording.
Truth is Taiwan got wind of the Ai Fens report.
?Shows US is roughly 14th from memory.
I posted that in another thread.
Are you giving credibility to "US is first" by the previously metric ??
There is no consistency to any of the metrics to derive anything meaningful at this stage, except perhaps for China which is showing containment. Even if their figures are a bit dodgy, there is nothing indicating other nation's are more accurate (except for what our CMO says wrt Australia).
The USA is well off peaking in its death rate, so if you are using 14th for that aspect of data, then it is premature.
The fact doctors had already highlighted human to human transmission.I said it did not make sense in terms of what was reported as being asked.
I repeat that what has been reported is inconsistent with what the letter asks: it uses information I have previously linked so there are no surprises that I can see.
Again, what is it that is of concern to Taiwan that would not have been provided to all other nations as well?
I have no idea what you are getting at.Are you giving credibility to "US is first" by the previously metric ?
As has Sweden, France, Belgium all who are marginally higher then the US.I have no idea what you are getting at.
The US response to this virus has been dreadful by most international standards.
interesting also that the three countries mentioned have had vastly different responses, for not much different results.As has Sweden, France, Belgium all who are marginally higher then the US.
The only difference is the opportunity to bag Trump. Political plays are fine. But don't dress it up with dodgy stats.
It's funny.interesting also that the three countries mentioned have had vastly different responses, for not much different results.
Higher than what?As has Sweden, France, Belgium all who are marginally higher then the US.
The only difference is the opportunity to bag Trump. Political plays are fine. But don't dress it up with dodgy stats.
You have looked at the stats?Higher than what?
How can you tell anything about respective rates unless you compare like with like?
You are not doing this.
What we know for sure is that Trump has sat on his hands and called this virus a "hoax."
As a result they are No. 1 in the worst aspects of the published data, ie total dead and total infected. Sadly, those data will increase the USA's lead.
Why have we moved off Taiwan and China?You have looked at the stats?
Looking at deaths per million is a better metric then total deaths.
Did you actually look at the measures that the US put in place or did you watch a cnn video. Because the US did not sit on its hands, that's what Sweden actually did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?