This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) outbreak discussion

Will the "Corona Virus" turn into a worldwide epidemic or fizzle out?

  • Yes

    Votes: 37 49.3%

  • No

    Votes: 9 12.0%

  • Bigger than SARS, but not worldwide epidemic (Black Death/bubonic plague)

    Votes: 25 33.3%

  • Undecided

    Votes: 4 5.3%
  • Total voters
    75
Jump to new

Are you serious. Have you not read anything about vaccines and viruses.
Please before you post the obvious. Research please
 

That is the problem with viruses, they mutate often which is why many in the medical world are calling BS on the vaccine mania.

The current wave of Covid in NSW has been identified as the one from Melbourne, so that indicates that the one in NSW before was in fact different from the one in Vic.

It was claimed that the virus in Europe was different to the one in the USA

We have had 100 years to get a working vaccine for the flu and we still can only achieve about 33% immunity most years ( research shows that Vitamin D achieves the same as well)

The flu vaccine success rates can vary from state to state and city to city apparently.

Get some sun and eat some oysters, Vitamin D and Zinc, seem to be firming up as the most successful defence.
 
satanoperca said:
Are you serious. Have you not read anything about vaccines and viruses.
Please before you post the obvious. Research please
Click to expand...

Aah no maybe I worded it poorly the mutations were as you say well known (if thats what you mean) the way the virus changes are not there is a difference that being we end up with something that will kill a lot more people than the current mutations changes can.

It was being compared to getting to kill 10% of infection cases.
 
A proper vaccine ain't going to happen for at least 12 months, if not longer.

Then there will be problems with distribution, prioritising first recipients and cost.

And then some silly bastard will neck a bat and we will have Covid-21.

Our best chance in my opinion is to minimise spread, maximise safe opening of economies while protecting the vulnerable and maintaining healthcare staffing, PPE and other medical assets. It's a difficult dance.

gg
 
UK deaths are being revised down for the same reason also.
 
wayneL said:
UK deaths are being revised down for the same reason also.
Click to expand...

Which means exactly... what ?

There has always been a rubberiness around working out the deaths caused directly/indirectly from COVID 19. From Day One there have been concerns that many people have died in nursing homes or at home from COVID but did not form part of the official figures.

There have been repeated efforts to use overall excess death rates in a country as a clearer indication of COVID deaths than just the day to day hospital deaths.
 
Media driven coved death figures were not correct in Australia. They were then politicised and used to lock down states. I didn't have a problem with lockdowns up to a point.

I am at a loss as why the figures need to be fudged at all.
 
We all know rhat covid deaths have been highly politicized, especially by the toxic left, your mob basilio.

it means but it seems there has been a little bit of over enthusiasm for attributing covid deaths.

Look man, we all want accurate figures that represent the true picture so that the responses of our society can be appropriate. Therefore, it is right to ascertain whether the figures we are given are accurate, from both sides of the argument.

If there are questions, then the questions must be answered honestly without indulging your sort of muck raking and character assassination bulshit.

So calm down and let people get to the bottom of it.
 
moXJO said:
Media driven coved death figures were not correct in Australia. They were then politicised and used to lock down states. I didn't have a problem with lockdowns up to a point.

I am at a loss as why the figures need to be fudged at all.
Click to expand...

The COVID death figures are not "media driven" . They come from the best available analysis at the time. Doesn't mean its perfect or not capable of being improved. It is an impossible challenge to identify exactly who has passed away and when across a country and get all the figures right. Thats why there are reassessments.

The figures weren't fudged MoX. If anything the real deaths attributable to COVID have not been reflected in the official tolls because they havn't been able to properly account for deaths at home or in aged care centres. They were hospital based figures. As has been pointed out repeatedly analysis of overall excess deaths in a country is a more accurate way to assess the impact of COVID.
 

Did the deaths from the 2000 plus virus breakouts in care homes end up being counted?

"excess death rates in a country as a clearer indication"

Correct.

The quibble over death rates seem to be another smoke screen for its no big deal open up the economy.

On another note really surprised that Sweden's Department head for looking after the virus actually lied about heard immunity.
And if the emails are correct staggered at his lack of knowledge regarding infectious disease rate of spread.
 
wayneL said:
We all know rhat covid deaths have been highly politicized, especially by the toxic left, your mob basilio.
Click to expand...

Just a little curious here Wayne...

Are you proposing that the daily COVID figures coming from medical compilations are just highly politicized figures constructed by the toxic left ?

Or does it just sound that way because of how you put it ?
 
basilio said:
Just a little curious here Wayne...

Are you proposing that the daily COVID figures coming from medical compilations are just highly politicized figures constructed by the toxic left ?

Or does it just sound that way because of how you put it ?
Click to expand...
Bas, if you're going to construct strawman arguments, try to do it intelligently and not so obviously Kathy Newmanesque... ie not so intentionally stupid.

Clearly there have been problems in the collations of the figures. If they are wrong, that's correct them, that's not politicize them for the benefit of any particular agenda.

I know Alinsky instructs you otherwise but do try to have discussions on the basis of what is actually going on.
 

I didn't start this discussion with the following statement Wayne
We all know rhat covid deaths have been highly politicized, especially by the toxic left, your mob basilio.

So lets be abundantly clear about who is is trying to smear who in this zoo.

I think it is always worthwhile getting accurate on COVID cases, deaths, other consequences and most importantly how we deal with a disastrous rapidly changing pandemic.

Having said that for the life of me I can't see how I or you or a thousand other key board warriors have the experience, skills and breadth of knowledge that epidemiological scientists bring to the table.

It is their expertise I acknowledge and support in this situation. The broad situation of a possible pandemic and how to respond to it has been understood by scientists for years. In that sense WHO was an international scientific body tasked with (trying) to ensure an effective world wide response.

The decision by the current US President to undermine this international body as well as undermining the US response to the pandemic and encouraging like minded leaders and followers to ignore the consequences of this foreseeable disaster is utterly criminal. The ongoing support for such an approach represents some of the worst elements of anti science, anti fact based thinking we currently experience.
 
Nathan Turners family would argue otherwise. He was directly used by media hysteria and the qld government despite the family and friends saying it was BS. They fought hard on social media. A lot of people clued on
It went on for a while, I thought I posted this earlier on as well?

Anyway easier to apologise after you get your way I suppose.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06...han-turner-false-positive-blackwater/12308080

The point is, yes their is some suspect activity for unknown reasons.
 
What was wrong with the opening statement? It is the absolute truth.

Look how the Komrades are distorting the Sweden narrative. Look at the project fear in MSM.

I merely advocate dispassionately looking at the data, no politicisation, no project fear, just the actual reality. On the other hand you and your ilk have no desire to do the same, oweing the stated aims up organisations such as the sinister @ssclowns at WEF.

My language maybe a little colourful but that does not take away from the facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

All trading needs to cease for 14 days prior to Monday open in Sydney
2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
11K
divs4ever
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...