- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
Yes, maybe another 2 generations to go perhaps. It will eventually change. Just hope I'm still around to see it.
I really think Obama will "go for it" no one else before him has had the guts but it's just so bad now I think he will, and good luck to him.
Would Banning Firearms reduce murder and suicide?
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf
"[T]here is no consistent significant positive association between gun ownership levels and violence rates: across (1) time within the United States, (2) U.S. cities, (3) counties within Illinois, (4) country‐sized areas like England, U.S. states, (5) regions of the United States, (6) nations, or (7) population subgroups . . ."
I really think Obama will "go for it" no one else before him has had the guts but it's just so bad now I think he will, and good luck to him.
I'm not a huge fan of the so-called "Liberal" party here in Australia (a better name for it would be "Conservative") but the gun laws were certainly a step in the right direction. Credit where it's due for that one.John Winston Howard did it here, with great courage and determination.
This appears to be a paper written by a student many years ago...one of thousands of papers i would think.
it has the authors on the front page and their bio, strong reading... nice to see you address the conclusion of the paper
gun controls up = less death and vice versa is not a sufficient argument, homogeneity of society, poverty etc etc are much more sufficient explanatory variables... but if we are in the business of making us feel better and on a higher moral ground by subscribing to the anti gun rights meme then feel free to go ahead
There has to be more to it than just the availabilty of guns, when you consider how common these incidents are in the US compared to the rest of the world.
I find myself disagreeing with you on just about everything.
Again, I disagree, I think it IS as simple as the availability of guns.
Ok so what's not beyond dispute is the fact that there are a lot of guns in the US, more guns per capita than anywhere else....so if more guns = more safety then why are there so many mass shootings in the US?
Why don't we see mass stabbings in the US? mass poisonings?
Gun controls up = less death and vice versa is a sufficient argument, and what's the down side to gun control anyway? oh right criminals will still be able to get them...oh shock horror, its random nutters we need protection from not criminals.
I find myself disagreeing with you on just about everything.
Again, I disagree, I think it IS as simple as the availability of guns.
read the paper i posted, it wont take long, you may find it illuminating..
its only a sufficient argument if you dont like to read or know anything
The US is a more violent society. Guns have been normalised as part of their culture. Indeed, the right to have a firearm is enshrined in the Constitution (it's in the English one too, but in much more watered down form).
That being said, comparing across countries, it's hard to reach any other conclusion than that the widespread availability of firearms (especially handguns) causes an increase in the number of deaths by firearm.
The two guys who wrote that paper both come from the less is more camp of gun control. I haven't read the paper but it's probably worth noting.
Type Gary Mauser into Google and this comes up...
View attachment 49996
if availability means both legal and illegal it would explain all the Americas.. now would outlawing guns in the US or watering it down remove its availability as its enshrined in the culture.. does the availability of guns deter other forms of homicide/crimes? would removing all availability lead them down the Russian experience of more deaths in total via beatings/stabbings?
A practical step would be to remove automatic guns, which could in a sense be argued as consistent with the 2nd amendment under its original meaning.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?