Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Cliches you love to hate!

Is "+1" becoming an ASF cliche?

Perhaps. What would you suggest as an alternative if you don't want to use what would quickly become another cliche: "I agree"?
It's just a simple way of letting a poster know that his/her sentiments are understood and agreed with rather than just nodding to oneself and yet not offering any feedback. Unless it's criticism, of course. Then there is no shortage of more full comment.
 
"You have got to be proactive not reactive".

I hate that one. It's so corny, especially when I hear it in a business meeting.
 
"agree to disagree"

... but I like the spelling of Micro$oft; even the abbreviation M$ - although that requires insider knowledge :p:
 
7744844_f520.jpg
 
Surging

Surging towards the line
The market is surging
A certain political party is surging
House prices are surging
Any given football team are surging as the game draws to the final siren

I have the urge to surge :D
 
Perhaps doesn't quite qualify as a cliche, but the endless repetition of "absolutely!!!" is getting worse.

The other one which totally mystifies me is someone answering a question with: "yeah, no".
Or making a statement, then a pause, then "yeah".
 
+1 is everywhere.

pinkboy

Ok. I think of it as shorthand. Rather like a 5 point scale. So

+2 could = strongly agree ; or
0 could = neutral; or
-1 could = disagree.

Etc.

For myself if it a timesaver then maybe we should head to the texting shorthand (which I generally find hard to follow) of people ok with that.

r u ok with this... ? :)

In the scheme of things it doesn't matter... I just find +1 a minor irritation but will work on surviving it. :)
 
Well, there goes 80% of common English idiom. How long before all the new cliches become hated? :p:

Ahhh such is life. (Is that a cliche?)
 
Well, there goes 80% of common English idiom. How long before all the new cliches become hated? :p:

Ahhh such is life. (Is that a cliche?)
+1 (just for muschu:))
It's pretty much a light hearted fun thread, isn't it? I guess cliches have become such because many of them do contain simple truths.
 
"It Was a Dark and Stormy Night".

"It was a dark and stormy night" is an often-mocked and parodied phrase written by English novelist Edward Bulwer-Lytton in the opening sentence of his 1830 novel Paul Clifford. The phrase is considered to represent "the archetypal example of a florid, melodramatic style of fiction writing," also known as purple prose

"It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents ”” except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness".
(Wikipedia)

Bulwer Lytton coined many other phrases widely used today such as;

"the pen is mightier than the sword",
"the great unwashed"
and "the almighty dollar",
 
"the devil is in the detail"


Then there is the mangled idiom

"the proof is in the pudding"

usually said by football coaches, but I suppose we can excuse them.

:rolleyes:
 
Serious.

Seriously.

Are you serious?

Get outta here.

Oh really? Do tell.

Way past beer o'clock. (I've turned that into: 17 mins past Bollinger) :D

One that isn't so much a cliché but the repetition of statements by our pollies e.g. al la Abbott and Hockey.

C'est la vie.
 
Top