CanOz
Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!
- Joined
- 11 July 2006
- Posts
- 11,543
- Reactions
- 519
Since most traders are wrong most of the time, I think the commitment of traders (by price level) indicates where not to enter a trade. Instead wait for the highly committed hoardes to get desperate, then hop on the opposite direction trade as they get out. Then of course one would need to know what the hoardes are hoping for - up or down.With that established let me say the most valuable characteristic of volume profiles for me is to show me where participants are committed. If I know where they are committed then I can determine with some degree of probability were they may want to get out of their commitments.
As you know, a volume node says there's a lot of buyers and sellers at a particular price, both betting against each other for the next move. Such volume is always from the big players (both sides), but we never know their time frame. They may be big players using HFT scalping, or they may be big players building a position over hours or days. So finding distressed traders by loking at the volume areas may not even be possible. What I said in the previous post probably isn't tradable.Only half can be wrong GB....and as minwa has shown discretionary traders can still out perform algorithms.
Only half can be wrong GB....and as minwa has shown discretionary traders can still out perform algorithms.
You almost want to be looking for downward moves with high volume and upwards moves with low volume, which is the opposite of what he says.
I don't do rhetoric. I do real.GB, the fact is there are transactions that have taken place, for each futures contract sold it must be owned by someone else and visa versa. Some of those traders will not hold on to thier positions and will be stopped out as the market moves against them. It is irrelevant to me what time frame they are, only that they are aggressive and I can see that on my DOM.
I'm quite happy to post my blog to Twitter each day if it means I avoid argument. This is my thread and I don't enjoy the semantic rhetoric....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?