This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Barack Obama!

Re: Obama - World Saviour or Bush Baggage Carrier ?


I think assassination is a huge risk, foreign policy or not. There are plenty of rednecks who'd like to take a shot just because he's black.

BA won't be able to perform miracles economically, and many people will see it as a disappointment but I hope he does as good a job as possible under the circumstances. Certainly anyone is an improvement after Bush.
 
Re: Obama - World Saviour or Bush Baggage Carrier ?

He's nothing but a poster boy. No one can do anything about the markets - they'll sort themselves out after a while on their own, simple as that

Careful. Wysiwyg reads these posts.

He may bring your words back to haunt you!

Do you *really* believe what you said? If so, how long is 'a while'?
 
Re: Obama - World Saviour or Bush Baggage Carrier ?

Obama wont be able to fix things, no one can, but he just might change a few things to help shore up the future.

I agree that his foreign policy is a worry and if he gets too radical with his ideas, well.......remember JFK.

Remember, JFK was tied up with the Mafia.

Marilyn Monroe met JFK through her then boyfriend... from Chicago.

Perhaps BO will release secret documents from that too, in his new transparency mode, as well as on Vietnam?

Obama survived the mob unscathed. Is this part and parcel of his basketball skills - besides slam dunking?
 
Re: Obama - World Saviour or Bush Baggage Carrier?

Alfred meets Barack and Hillary.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 59
  • images (1).jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 59
  • images (3).jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 61
  • images (2).jpg
    2.4 KB · Views: 67
Geithner taking a page from the book of Big Daddy Obama: if Big Daddy can scream "no lobbyists" then hire a lobbyist, why can't Geithner?

Geithner Sets Limits on Lobbying for Bailout Money
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/business/economy/28lobby.html?ref=politics

We can't have lobbyists anywhere near bailout money, but a former Goldman Sachs lobbyist can be chief of staff for Geithner, right, right?

Ethics Order Affects Aide to Geithner
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123309702282121649.html
The new chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was a top lobbyist for Goldman Sachs Group Inc. until last year, and will have to recuse himself from some government duties under new White House ethics rules.
 
Re: Barack 2009!

Mr.Geitner is a crook, plain and simple, and he now heads Treasury, the world is in a recession and the head of the US Treasury is a crook.

gg

You have some nerve saying this in public. Don't be surprised if he sues you for defamation and I'm sure he has some high powered lawyers working for him. Who do you have?!
 
Re: Barack 2009!

You have some nerve saying this in public. Don't be surprised if he sues you for defamation and I'm sure he has some high powered lawyers working for him. Who do you have?!

Are you pitching for the brief?
 
Re: Barack 2009!

You have some nerve saying this in public. Don't be surprised if he sues you for defamation and I'm sure he has some high powered lawyers working for him. Who do you have?!

His lawyers will be VEEEEERRY busy tracking town the 100's of 1000's of folks on the Internets calling him names.

Honestly!
 
Nothing yet from Mr President on how he intends to deal with the second wave of mortgage defaults, forecast to exceed sub-prime, that are just starting to hit other areas of America and are set to continue for several years.
 
Will be interesting when this second package of US measures reaches the statute books, "The Obama Package".
 
Re: Barack 2009!

Mr.Geitner is a crook, plain and simple, and he now heads Treasury, the world is in a recession and the head of the US Treasury is a crook.

So be it, but don't try to whitewash Obama's role in this. **** sticks.
gg

Barack Obama picked Timothy Geithner to save the U.S. economy.

Did Barack pick Geithner or was he earmarked beforehand???


Timothy Geithner was one of the guests at the Bilderberg conference last year and strangely, invitees make it into high places after their visit to this conference.

Timothy F. Geithner (2004, 2008), current President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Tony Blair, James Callaghan and Gordon Brown attended the conference and became Prime Minister following it.So there is some connection with the attendees and getting a backscratch and nod from the power brokers of the world.Bit like friends in high places.

Tony Blair (1993), former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Gordon Brown (1991), current Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
James Callaghan (1963, 1966), former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

The Bilderberg Conference ....

The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an unofficial annual invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of influence in the fields of politics, business and banking.
 
Ah the hope and change:



The real Obama emerges. Anyone still think he is a different kind of politician?
 
same way they closed their eyes and ears to ACORN...the group involved in the sub prime mess....obama was the lawyer that instigated the racist theme..so banks had to lend to the blacks...regardless of no income etc

and ACORN still benefits from all these bailouts.....wonder how much obama reaps from that deal alone....
aahhh chicargo...
this one carries far more baggage than any prior president
 
Ah the hope and change:




The real Obama emerges. Anyone still think he is a different kind of politician?

I noticed the lobbyists at Fraudie Mac and Flunky Mae paid him $100,000 in campaign contributions.

I have been impressed with this lady from Missouri though. Its well overdue, something had to be said.

http://www.kansascity.com/637/story/1010370.html

McCaskill on corporate executives' pay: 'These people are idiots'

Sen. Claire McCaskill — steaming mad and not going to take it anymore — on Friday called Wall Street executives “idiots” and proposed limits on some of their salaries.

Her proposal would force companies taking federal bailout money to limit compensation for any employee to what the president of the United States currently earns: $400,000 a year.

“Is that so unreasonable?” the Democrat from Missouri asked. “It’s eight times the median household income in the United States of America. … I don’t think that sounds like a bad deal.”

The idea lit up blogs, Web sites and TV screens across the nation, with many applauding her attack on wealthy bankers and investors.

“They don’t get it,” McCaskill said on the Senate floor. “These people are idiots.”

The compensation cap would cover salary, bonuses and stock options.

Critics quickly struck back, calling the plan shortsighted.

“It’s a stupid idea,” said Woody Cozad, a lobbyist, commentator and Republican from Missouri. “I don’t defend anyone who’s at those companies now, but if they all need to be replaced, you’re not going to replace them with anybody very good for $400,000.”

If these people were so good, why do they need public money to survive? :bs:


I notice no-one from the Republicans has uttered a murmur on the issue.
 

This will sure make the high income potential candidates rush out to check and pay their taxes!

This reminds me of those footie stars who lost their contracts for being in a brawl - warning to others!
 
ATM I am so grateful I live downunder!
Krudd's packages are pre-emptive for Aus.
Obama's is to provide a solution for the US:

http://my.barackobama.com/recoveryplan

 
This will sure make the high income potential candidates rush out to check and pay their taxes!

This reminds me of those footie stars who lost their contracts for being in a brawl - warning to others!
President Obama seems to be backtracking on his "buy American" stimulus package. A quick but uncertain start and even the package may be held up. What next?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...