This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Barack Obama!

Re: Barack 2008!

This was an interview on 31 August but look into those eyes and see they have it!
Biden will 'catch any blind spots' he has...

I noticed on Letterman last week that Barack's fast going grey at the temples.

Barack on Biden and Palin:

 
Re: Barack 2008!

Received this morning:


How can McPalin keep insisting - out of context - that Obama will "increase taxes"?

Do GOP supporters all earn over $250k thus will be included in the tax increases?
 
Re: Barack 2008!

OBAMA: NO 'BLANK CHECK' FOR WALL STREET

It's a busy week for both candidates in campaigning and preparing for their first debate on Saturday our time.
Both may be diverted to Washington to vote on the rescue package - and analyse and dissect it before a vote.
Luckily Barack only needs about five hours sleep a night!

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/21/1430369.aspx
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Obama vows deep cuts in spending

This will have a lot of folk watching their backs!

McCain has been using Obama's slogan of change. Will he now adopt his White House Monitoring Team idea?

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5isOFwdbq0tsqatW6vJpkDRTI1gMgD93C58C80
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Did anyone see Bill Clinton on Letterman tonight?

IMO he did a brilliant job in clearly and succinctly explaining why the economy was in its current state - with the IT bubble burst in 2002 and money injected by the government as well as low interest rates, to offset a recession, used by the wealthy by investing in property (instead of green-energy-creating jobs) and the role of derivatives and subsequently the sub-prime financing.
(He didn't mention household mortgages being re-financed for holidays)

He promoted Hillary twice as he mentioned her ideas over the past year for regulatory bodies, including one similar to one appointed in the 30's.

When Letterman suggested no-one would want to be president now, he insisted this was the perfect time:
'But low - sell high'. lol. It can't get much worse so whoever wins should look at it with great relish.

"Anyone who has bet against the US in the past 200 years has lost."

His advice was financial regulation cleanup, re-mortgages and investment to create jobs.
- Invest money to make jobs not more money... (with derivatives).

He praised Biden's history and value as VP and close friend of theirs.

He predicted that Obama would bounce after the debates and win in November by a larger margin than would be expected now. He did well.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

I think a main reason for the US problems was the sudden growth of China and Asia, that produced cheap goods for export. Following this there was a great demand for commodities and prices rocketed.
Demand from Asian countries grew and grew and this eventually caused a rapid rise in oil prices.
The US dollar was sold down big time and the US cash headed out of the States for the middle-east.
War costs had to be met and this impacted further on America.

There is no way out of the war in Afghanistan and it will become as large as the budget expenditure in Afghanistan and Iraq before.

Who ever was President would have been stuck with the same problems, and they will travel on into the next President's domain and he will not be able to avoid them.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

How many Aussies will hold Debate Watch parties this Friday night?

... should be fun to watch the debate at 5am Saturday morning... for those still standing... or sitting!

 
Re: Barack 2008!

Barack's strategy of having folk feel they are part of his campaign and have hope continues:

 
Re: Barack 2008!

The gaffemaster (Joe Biden) strikes again:


Can you imagine if Sarah Palin (or McCain) had made this gaffe? The media would feature it all day long. But, not a peep from our Obamania media.

(Did you catch the gaffe?)



FDR was not elected until 1932 - the stock market crash was in 1929.

Oh, here is another point about that gaffe:

If Hoover or FDR appeared on television in 1929 or even 1933, only a few hundred people would have seen it. Television was still an experimental medium and wouldn’t be introduced to the public for at least another decade.


That Joe Biden - he sure is a treasure (for the Republicans).
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Barack leads in four battleground states.

The only poll that counts is on 4 November but like grains of sand on a beach, each one has potential.

This reminds me of a 100 metre sprint.
- The second runner has to hold their breath and focus on that extra burst to pass the other guy.
- The leader has to not look around but focus on that finish line.

The big question is, what will they look like this time next week?
 

Attachments

  • NA-AS694_SWING_NS_20080923195344.gif
    10.6 KB · Views: 79
Re: Barack 2008!

Biden puts his foot in it again - will this potent issue kill Obama in Pennsylvania, southeastern Ohio, and the coal region of Virginia and West Virginia?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Biden_No_coal_plants_here_in_America.html?showall

Biden: 'No coal plants here in America'



Barack's head must be exploding in anger with this one! Biden wrote McCain's next commercial for the battleground states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. This is America's coal belt, that just happen to be battleground states. Those coalminers are swing voters!!

Thanks Barack, the gift of Biden just keeps on giving!!!
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Guess who said this today:


Jewish organizers of an anti-Iran rally next week have dropped Sarah Palin from the event, days after Hillary Clinton pulled out.

Clinton aides fumed over what they saw as a slight by organizers, because they had no idea until told by reporters that Palin was supposed to attend too.

Hillary had agreed weeks ago to attend the rally, but abruptly backed out late Tuesday after learning of the pairing.

"Governor Palin was pleased to accept an invitation to address this rally and show her resolve on this grave national security issue."

He blamed "Democratic partisans" and Barack Obama's campaign for pressing organizers to dump Palin.

McCain's campaign did not explain why it thinks Democrats and the Obama camp were behind the rescinded invitation.


Guess who said this today:

 
Re: Barack 2008!

There may be hope for the Democrats yet.

The latest poll looks as if Obama is ahead.

Its from the Washington Post.

Although McCain/Palin seem to have more mongrel in them and you need mongrel to win an election.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/23/AR2008092303667_pf.html

gg


Economic Fears Give Obama Clear Lead Over McCain in Poll

By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, September 24, 2008; A01

Turmoil in the financial industry and growing pessimism about the economy have altered the shape of the presidential race, giving Democratic nominee Barack Obama the first clear lead of the general-election campaign over Republican John McCain, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News national poll.

Just 9 percent of those surveyed rated the economy as good or excellent, the first time that number has been in single digits since the days just before the 1992 election. Just 14 percent said the country is heading in the right direction, equaling the record low on that question in polls dating back to 1973.

More voters trust Obama to deal with the economy, and he currently has a big edge as the candidate who is more in tune with the economic problems Americans now face. He also has a double-digit advantage on handling the current problems on Wall Street, and as a result, there has been a rise in his overall support. The poll found that, among likely voters, Obama now leads McCain by 52 percent to 43 percent. Two weeks ago, in the days immediately following the Republican National Convention, the race was essentially even, with McCain at 49 percent and Obama at 47 percent.


gg
 
Re: Barack 2008!

On Boston Legal this week, David E Kelly created a scenario for the Democratic Candidacy election.
He must have thought Obama needed help to win the nomination when he wrote this! (We view 6 months behind)

Now, a delegate in Massachusetts intended to vote for Obama even though Hillary had won the popular vote.
His character was 22 and achieved this position from volunteering for the party. Cute.

He was taken to court but his argument was upheld, that, as a delegate, he had a conscience vote.

As he thought Obama would make the better candidate he was casting his vote for him, not Hillary.
He gave good reasons.
Great show!


On to the presidential election: - It takes 270 of 538 electoral votes to win.

Currently predicted:
Obama: 202
McCain: 163
Undecided: 173

http://www.270towin.com/


HOW TO VOTE - For those who may not know:

Rather than directly voting for the President and Vice President, United States citizens cast votes for electors.

Electors are technically free to vote for anyone eligible to be President, but in practice pledge to vote for specific candidates and voters cast ballots for favored Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates by voting for correspondingly pledged electors.


Most states allow voters to choose between statewide slates of electors pledged to vote for the Presidential and Vice Presidential tickets of various parties; the ticket that receives the most votes statewide 'wins' all of the votes cast by electors from that state.

U.S. Presidential campaigns concentrate on winning the popular vote in a combination of states that choose a majority of the electors, rather than campaigning to win the most votes nationally.

My friends in Orange County are not usually interested in the election as the 270 electoral votes are usually reached by the time California gets to vote... so they don't need to, as the president is already decided.
Their voting starts hours later due to the time differential. This year they're hopeful they'll get to vote as it's so close.


If there is a tie in electoral votes:

Under the constitution, the election for president is thrown into the House of Representatives.

* The House must vote by states, with each state delegation having a single vote, and a majority of the states (at least 26 of 50) required to agree on the winner.


The Senate picks the next vice-president (the Senate's presiding officer).

* The Senate simply requires a majority of its 100 members to select the vice- president.


Hmm... So theoretically you could have Obama for president and Palin as VP?

Hmm... Perhaps they will get their first female president if Nancy Pelosi has to care-take while they decide!
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Doris, you'd have to say that in view of the current financial meltdown under the Republican watch, this election has to be pretty much unloseable for Obama.
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Concerning the USD700Gigadollars bailout bill -

a) Whoever stops it will be blamed if there is an immediate recession/ depression. (no win for the Democrats) , and
b) Whoever inherits the fallout (assuming it is passed - and assuming it is the Democrats), could well find themselves up against a worse recession down the track.

Gotta be a no-brainer for Bush to help pass this bill (and retire claiming "all's well - so far at least" ) .

and gotta be a poisoned chalice for the Dems

The timing is atrocious (to my simplistic eye)
 
Re: Barack 2008!

Doris, you'd have to say that in view of the current financial meltdown under the Republican watch, this election has to be pretty much unloseable for Obama.

You'd have to think so Julia.

But too many people seem to believe McCain is a maverick and do not see him as being responsible for GWB's mess.

Not enough look behind the slurs he's made against Obama... They relish every chance to be aggressive.

Lots of young people (18 to 25) have enrolled but will they get out to vote? It's a work/school day!

But then the women who supported Hillary are now returning from McCain/Palin's camp.

This Saturday 5:00 - 6:30 am will turn the tide... you'd think. But McCain has set 'the orator' slur too.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...