Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Australian Politics General...

We're going to disagree about something sometime. :D

My perception of Abbott though, and I'll readily acknowledge it does come via the media since I've only met him once, is of allowing his personal religious beliefs to interfere with politics. That may be wrong but it is certainly my perception.

Australia could be described as a Christian society to a point certainly but it's one where most don't take it particularly seriously. They'll celebrate Christmas and know the Bible exists but that's pretty much it really for most.



I think most have an underlying assumption that anyone elected to parliament is going to represent someone.

Labor is associated with the unions to a point still.

National is associated with farmers to some extent yes.

Greens aren't a serious contender for government but they do raise a lot of "Left" issues so at least we sort of know where their thinking is at.

Liberals? Who do they represent? To me that's not at all clear beyond saying it isn't normal employee workers, it isn't the natural environment, it doesn't really seem to be small business beyond a very limited extent and it isn't anything of a scientific or technical nature which itself covers a pretty big slice of the pie these days.

So who do they represent?

I doubt many people could really answer that question at the moment.

None of that is to say Labor will do any better. That's a different question entirely. :2twocents

I think I would be happier to be associated with the unions than the banks if royal commissions are anything to go by.....
 
We're going to disagree about something sometime. :D

My perception of Abbott though, and I'll readily acknowledge it does come via the media since I've only met him once, is of allowing his personal religious beliefs to interfere with politics. That may be wrong but it is certainly my perception.

Australia could be described as a Christian society to a point certainly but it's one where most don't take it particularly seriously. They'll celebrate Christmas and know the Bible exists but that's pretty much it really for most.



I think most have an underlying assumption that anyone elected to parliament is going to represent someone.

Labor is associated with the unions to a point still.

National is associated with farmers to some extent yes.

Greens aren't a serious contender for government but they do raise a lot of "Left" issues so at least we sort of know where their thinking is at.

Liberals? Who do they represent? To me that's not at all clear beyond saying it isn't normal employee workers, it isn't the natural environment, it doesn't really seem to be small business beyond a very limited extent and it isn't anything of a scientific or technical nature which itself covers a pretty big slice of the pie these days.

So who do they represent?

I doubt many people could really answer that question at the moment.

None of that is to say Labor will do any better. That's a different question entirely. :2twocents
Good points there.

I think there is an appetite for a moderate conservative government in Oz, certainly in circles I mix in, there is a big appetite for it.

The problem I see with the center right and right in general (Libs are no longer truly on the right) is that there is always a deal breaker.

Bernardis Conservatives for example. Most of their platform is very appealing to middle Australia, but the overt religious element and anti abortion stance is a huuuuge deal breaker.

With PHON, its Paulines temperament

With Lib Dems is the gun policy etc.
 
There wasn't a hope in Hades of Turnbull winning the election @PZ99
Last Newspoll for Turnbull was 49/51 2PP.

Howard, Keating won elections from further back than that.

Anything closer than 47/53 is competitive for any sitting Govt.
 
The Nationals are crumbling around Australia. Why this is happening and the new options for rural voters makes fascinating reading. The next election could see profound changes in who represents rural Australia.


Nationals face their biggest threat yet after an annus horribilis

Traditional party of the bush wracked by personal scandals, leadership instability and a raft of new competitors on their turf
https://www.theguardian.com/austral...-biggest-threat-yet-after-an-annus-horribilis
 
And just to press the point about challenge facing the Nationals (and obviously the Coalition) check this out.

Sigh. Now the voters of Australia are forced to add moral disgust to our political burden
Jacqueline Maley23 December 2018 — 12:05am
  • Send via Email
The Country Women’s Association, better known for bake sales, crochet and quiet charity than loud displays of feminism, is as fed up as the rest of us. This week its president Tanya Cameron said most of her organisation’s members were “very disappointed” with our politicians.

“As president of a long-standing organisation that has maintained its credibility because of its conservative approach, and ethical and moral standards, we are quite appalled at some of the behaviour within politics,” she said.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 1:51

image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg

1:51

Andrew Broad: The scandal that claimed an MP
Playing...
The married family-values frontbencher fell on his sword after becoming embroiled in the 'sugar baby' scandal.

“The misogynistic attitude needs to stop and it needs to stop very quickly, it needs to be changed...a lot of our members are questioning how they will go to the polls.”

If there is a better explanation of why the government should be very afraid of credible centre-right independents taking rural seats, I am yet to see it.

When you’ve lost the CWA, you’ve lost the country, and this must especially be true for a conservative government, full of politicians whose Facebook pages are replete with posed pictures at lamington drives and school fetes, and all the other CWA events that provide the perfect backdrop for their self-promotion.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/po...-to-our-political-burden-20181221-p50npj.html
 
The Guardian did a good summary of the last two days in the Senate.
Why parliament still tolerates thuggery not acceptable in broader society
Katharine Murphy
LNP Senator Barry O’Sullivan blew the lid off with a comment he made about the Greens’ Sarah Hanson-Young

https://www.theguardian.com/austral...es-thuggery-not-acceptable-in-broader-society
Thuggery takes many styles and many parties.lol
 
Christina Keneally by all reports seems to have become the chosen one to replace Chris Hayes in the western Sydney seat of Fowler.
Keneally, who lives in the very upmarket Sydney Northern beaches is being parachuted into the seat from the senate despite not living there.
She will of course shift to Western Sydney.
It was feared that Keneally would not win the difficult third senate seat in NSW.
Keneally will thus have occupied a senate seat where the electors have never actually voted for her.
She was previously parachuted into the senate by Bill Shorten when Sam Dastyari was forced into exile.
She was available for this senate spot because the voters had rejected her in Benelong, John Howards old seat, against former tennis star John Alexander. This seat was also well away from her upmarket home on Scotland Island.
Prior to that she had been elected leader of NSW opposition and promptly lost the 2011 election in a landslide.
Can anyone else see a pattern here?
The seat she is reportedly planning on contesting is a multicultural mix of ethnicities with one of the largest groups being Vietnamese.
The locals seemingly were keen on a 30 year old lawyer (hell, not another one) the daughter of Vietnamese refugees.
Seems like the perfect background story for an ABC piece.
But alas, the local labour branch has not been involved in preselection of its candidate since 2007.
Nothing has really changed.
Politics is about power - getting the power and keeping it.
Mick
 
Christina Keneally by all reports seems to have become the chosen one to replace Chris Hayes in the western Sydney seat of Fowler.
Keneally, who lives in the very upmarket Sydney Northern beaches is being parachuted into the seat from the senate despite not living there.
She will of course shift to Western Sydney.
It was feared that Keneally would not win the difficult third senate seat in NSW.
Keneally will thus have occupied a senate seat where the electors have never actually voted for her.
She was previously parachuted into the senate by Bill Shorten when Sam Dastyari was forced into exile.
She was available for this senate spot because the voters had rejected her in Benelong, John Howards old seat, against former tennis star John Alexander. This seat was also well away from her upmarket home on Scotland Island.
Prior to that she had been elected leader of NSW opposition and promptly lost the 2011 election in a landslide.
Can anyone else see a pattern here?
The seat she is reportedly planning on contesting is a multicultural mix of ethnicities with one of the largest groups being Vietnamese.
The locals seemingly were keen on a 30 year old lawyer (hell, not another one) the daughter of Vietnamese refugees.
Seems like the perfect background story for an ABC piece.
But alas, the local labour branch has not been involved in preselection of its candidate since 2007.
Nothing has really changed.
Politics is about power - getting the power and keeping it.
Mick
1631318474991.png

Person of the people.
Mick
 
Victorian Liberal Party has shown that once again that the dictum that people who ignore history are doomed to repeat its failure still rings true.
Michael O'Brien was just not cutting the mustard in opposition, so they have a coup and replace him with the same Guy who lost the last election. O'Brien, who replaced Guy after the getting pummelled at the last election in 2018 wasn't even the given the opportunity to lose as leader, didn't even last that long.
Guy is no lazarus with a triple bypass, he is just your standard lying sneaky power hungry pollie.
Libs are destined to lose next election as well, despite the buildup up of animosity tho Genghis Dan.
Mick
 
Victorian Liberal Party has shown that once again that the dictum that people who ignore history are doomed to repeat its failure still rings true.
Michael O'Brien was just not cutting the mustard in opposition, so they have a coup and replace him with the same Guy who lost the last election. O'Brien, who replaced Guy after the getting pummelled at the last election in 2018 wasn't even the given the opportunity to lose as leader, didn't even last that long.
Guy is no lazarus with a triple bypass, he is just your standard lying sneaky power hungry pollie.
Libs are destined to lose next election as well, despite the buildup up of animosity tho Genghis Dan.
Mick
As diabolically bad Labor/Greens are, the Libs/Nats are even worse.... in every state.

Neither deserve to be anywhere near government at all.

"It's Time" to vote for someone else
 
Glad has fallen on her sword and resigned after ICAc said they were investigating her.
Investigating does not mean guilt, but unlike the days of Neville Wran, you can't just stand aside.

She did the right thing and resigned, the opposition and MSM would have eventually hounded her out.

However, as usual, the parasites are fighting over the spoils as they dodge and weve trying to take her place.
From Todays OZ
“Over the coming days I will be talking to my family and colleagues about how I can best serve the people of NSW to continue to achieve these aims.

Mr Stokes and Mr Ayres are both moderates as well, and could reportedly benefit from the decision by a centre-right alliance, led by Police Minister David Elliott, to withdraw support from Mr Perrottet.

In return, Mr Elliott could be in the running for deputy party leader, a position that will be voted on at the same party room meeting.

If MPs can agree in advance on who should take either of the top positions, no vote will be needed.
So parasite no 2 withdraws support from parasite no 1 and favours parasites 2 and 3 so that parasite no1 then gets the deputy keadership position.
No mention of whats good for the party, the parliament, or heaven forbid the people of NSW.
Mick
 
Glad has fallen on her sword and resigned after ICAc said they were investigating her.
Investigating does not mean guilt, but unlike the days of Neville Wran, you can't just stand aside.

She did the right thing and resigned, the opposition and MSM would have eventually hounded her out.

However, as usual, the parasites are fighting over the spoils as they dodge and weve trying to take her place.
From Todays OZ



So parasite no 2 withdraws support from parasite no 1 and favours parasites 2 and 3 so that parasite no1 then gets the deputy keadership position.
No mention of whats good for the party, the parliament, or heaven forbid the people of NSW.
Mick
Dont mean she aint guilty either Mick.....run it through the pub test......oh thats right you cant go to the pub
 
Dont mean she aint guilty either Mick.....run it through the pub test......oh thats right you cant go to the pub
That was cruel!
I have never been a fan of ICACS.
There is no place in society for secret star chambers.
The various versions of ICAC have killed three NSW premiers , one of whom was found not guilty at the end of it , the other was forced to resign, not because he did something corrupt, but because someone gifted him a bottle of grange (a highly overated wine in my opinion).
Neville Wran was fingered by ICAC but was eventually exonerated.
The stupid thing is that so much of the evidence extracted by ICAC ends up being inadmissible in a law court, which is where everyone gets tried in the end.
ICACS in their various forms are mainly to stroke the egos of vain QC's.
Mick
 
That was cruel!
I have never been a fan of ICACS.
There is no place in society for secret star chambers.
The various versions of ICAC have killed three NSW premiers , one of whom was found not guilty at the end of it , the other was forced to resign, not because he did something corrupt, but because someone gifted him a bottle of grange (a highly overated wine in my opinion).
Neville Wran was fingered by ICAC but was eventually exonerated.
The stupid thing is that so much of the evidence extracted by ICAC ends up being inadmissible in a law court, which is where everyone gets tried in the end.
ICACS in their various forms are mainly to stroke the egos of vain QC's.
Mick
Ffs if you think he was gone for the grange i would think naive springs to mind
 
Top