Did this come out before or after Higgins?I couldn't find a thread for this on-going debacle, so this is here.
I was leaning towards innocent against Higgins for a long time, but this makes it even more complicated. Bloody hell, what a nightmare.
View attachment 164684
Prosecutors in the ACT last year dropped charges against Mr Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins, saying a retrial of the case would pose an unacceptable risk to her health. The trial had earlier been aborted after a juror was found to have brought outside material into the jury room.
Mr Lehrmann was charged in January with two counts of rape by detectives from the Criminal Investigations Branch over the alleged offence in Toowoomba in 2021, but he has not yet been committed for trial.
On Thursday, Justice Peter Applegarth lifted an interim suppression order on Mr Lehrmann’s identity.
Earlier this month, Toowoomba magistrate Clare Kelly lifted a suppression order but delayed her decision to allow Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers to apply to the Supreme Court to keep it in place.
The media has been barred from naming Mr Lehrmann during a number of court appearances this year, because previous laws protected the identity of people charged with serious sexual offences until they were committed to trial.
At the hearing on Thursday, Mr Lehrmann’s barrister, Andrew Hoare, argued that his client had experienced suicidal ideation during the past two years and was at risk of “catastrophic” self-harm, including suicide, if the non-publication order was lifted.
After would be suspicious.