- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,856
- Reactions
- 24,906
JULIA Gillard says her Pacific Solution is sending a strong message to would-be asylum seekers, despite the arrival of more than 4600 boat people since she announced the resumption of offshore processing.
The Prime Minister today accused the opposition of policy on the run after it vowed to send asylum-seekers to Nauru and Papua New Guinea's Manus Island for up to five years.
The minister responsible for media releases on boat intercepts is so ashamed of the party he represents that their's no mention of it on his website header.
http://www.jasonclare.com.au/media/portfolio-releases/home-affairs-and-justice-releases.html
The list of media releases paints a very sorry picture indeed.
18 boats so far this month.
The above boat makes 21 so far this month.
That's more than one per day.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...xtravagance-20121021-27z9t.html#ixzz29yfsoLGuThe opposition spokesman on immigration, Scott Morrison, pointed out last week that the spending in the 2011-12 financial year averaged $12.8 million for every illegal boat arrival, or $172,700 for every person on board.
2 today, 1 yesterday.
22/10/2012 Border Protection Command intercepts vessels
21/10/2012 Border Protection Command intercepts vessel
22/10/2012 Border Protection Command assists vessel
Another boat.
This one is in addition to those above.
http://www.jasonclare.com.au/media/...border-protection-command-assists-vessel.html
Wong has chopped off the baby bonus
In the broader tax reform context yes (I'll asume that's what you mean), but no good comes from cutting one form of waste to fund another, inparticular when the recipients are not even our own citizens.At least something good comes from all this!
In the broader tax reform context yes (I'll asume that's what you mean), but no good comes from cutting one form of waste to fund another, inparticular when the recipients are not even our own citizens.
Are you arguing for or against ?How much of the headline number goes in cash to the illegal immigrants and how much is paid to government employees (e.g. Navy) and Australian companies to provide basic services to these people?
Are you arguing for or against ?
The problem with that point of view is it's the taxes of Australian citizens that you want to share and our lifestyle that you wish to compromise to satisfy your soft heart.'For those who'vecome across the seas; we've boundless plains to share'....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?