This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Asylum immigrants - Green Light

The evolving story of those burns,


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...tories-revealed/story-fn9hm1gu-1226814426441#

Meanwhile, Scott Morrison will appear at a Labor/Greens-dominated Senate inquiry in Canberra today to defend the government's Operation Sovereign Borders policy.

Today's OSB operational update is looking like it will be no boats over the past week.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...olicy-offensive/story-fn9hm1gu-1226814437544#
 

Doc, I watched some of the senate committee enquiry and I could not believe the gimcrack questions coming out of the mouths of Carr and Hanson-Young.....They were asking question for the sake of asking questions which had no punch whatsoever......They were all at SEA, pardon the pun, and they tried all they could to discredit the OSP......Labor and the Greens must be furious that there has been no boat arrivals for 43 days.
 
I watched most of it. Morrison did a great job and he and his team made SHY in particular but also Carr and Ludwig look like amateurs.
Not to mention how extraordinarily rude Senator Carr managed to be. Good for Scott Morrison.
It won't, however, stop the whining from the Left.
 
I watched most of it. Thought that Scott Morrison excelled. I can't believe the fuss labor and green are making about the control of information policy adopted by the government. Surely they should be relieved that the mass drownings have abated.

I guess that this is the only area they can attack what is proving to be a very effective policy.
 
A detailed media story on a turn back using one of the recently purchased bright orange lifeboats.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...lum-seeker-boats/story-fni0xqrb-1226815340238

Most encouraging is this,


Friday's OSP operational update confirmed no boats over the past week. It's now been 6-weeks without a boat arrival. Voluntary returns to country of origin from Offshore Processing Centres since OSB commenced on 18 September 2013 has increased by 2 over the past week to a total of 141.

http://newsroom.customs.gov.au/channels/operational-updates/releases/operational-update-31-january
 
Not to mention how extraordinarily rude Senator Carr managed to be. Good for Scott Morrison.
My sentiments also. Shouting and finger wagging ... what an arrogant and incompetent half-wit he is. Morrison's self-control was beautiful to watch.

Labor created the problem, now they can't handle the fact that the govt. is fixing it.

Those orange lifeboats are shaping up as a stroke of genius. The illegals can't scuttle them like they do with the fishing boats and the Indos end up with excellent vessels they can use as patrol boats.
 
From some one who was there.
If the 'tub thumpers' care not to read it, I'd hardly be suprised

--------------------------------------
Lauren Smith saw the Department of Immigration’s handling of asylum seeker cases from the inside. Now free from the bureaucracy, she wonders whether she should have spoken up.


"Why did ordinary men participate in the killing process during the Holocaust? This essay question in a university subject put me on the path that I am on today. I have travelled the world analysing the behaviour of people involved in war.

People react differently to war. A range of emotions take over: anger, pain, grief, loss, sadness, frustration and denial. But in every person I have seen fear. Then I have heard blame: someone else is responsible for these killings.

Usually, the people I am talking to do not feel responsible, including the perpetrators. People on all sides believe they are “the goodies” and that their actions were justified: the perpetrators, the victims, the bystanders.

And I was the same when confronted with being involved in the war on refugees. Believing I was doing a “good” job helping support people escaping war, I took work with the protection visa section of the Department of Immigration. I was providing administrative support to people determining who was a “genuine” refugee and who was not. Our team was determining which “boat people” could stay in the safety of Australia and who would be returned.

Shortly after joining this section I realised that the Australian government and some of my colleagues were seriously endangering innocent people by returning them to unsafe countries.

Throughout all of this I convinced myself that it was not my fault, I wanted to do good things but couldn’t. I blamed everyone else — I blamed the government, I blamed the officers. I blamed the Australian public for electing the government.

In May 2013, I went to Christmas Island; an experience that began to unravel my comforting alibis. I began to understand my participation in these callous and life threatening processes. I was there to organise screening interviews for Sri Lankan clients. Many of these clients were poor fisherman, coming to Australia as they would die of starvation if they stayed in Sri Lanka.

As they were viewed as “economic refugees”, the government saw an opportunity to send a strong message: they were not wanted in Australia. A secret process was created: enhanced screening. This denied these asylum seekers access to legal representation and proper protection during interviews. The aim was simply to send them back as quickly as possible. Sri Lanka is one of few countries to which Australia has the right to forcibly return asylum seekers. This opportunity was seized, ignoring much evidence that, for these asylum seekers, a return to Sri Lanka could imperil their lives.

In the north of Sri Lanka, there is still mass corruption and discrimination. This is affecting people’s livelihoods and starving desperate fisherman. These “economic refugees” are still imperilled by war’s prejudicial aftermath. I saw starving mothers holding newborn babies come off these boats. No matter what anyone says, there must be very serious reasons why they had risked their lives and the lives of their children to come to Australia. Their starvation was directly linked to the political climate of their country. However, Australia refuses to recognise this as a valid reason to claim refuge. So we returned these people, very possibly to die.

For a while I continued to delude myself that this wasn’t my fault. I didn’t make these decisions, the protection visa officers did. These people, these Sri Lankans, chose to take this journey. They understood the risk. And if they didn’t understand, the “people smuggler” did. The people smugglers were surely to blame.

However, the day I returned from Christmas Island I was told 28 life jackets had washed up on the shores of Cocos Island, an Australian island. Some 28 Iranian refugees had been killed in Australian waters.

I was devastated to learn this, but I begun to put together the pieces of the puzzle. For a week while I was on Christmas Island, I had been waiting for that boat to arrive on shore, so we could assess their claims for asylum. Hearing the news they had died sent me into a state of shock. I realised it was not the dangerous journey or the people smugglers that had killed these people, it was we Australians.

“We knew for a week they were close to our shores, we were constantly monitoring them, and we let them die.”
We knew for a week they were close to our shores, we were constantly monitoring them, and we let them die. We knew they were in trouble, and we chose not to save them. Furthermore, this was published in the newspaper, and Australian citizens just ignored the fact that our government believed it had the right to choose who lives or dies.

As I grappled with the seriousness of the situation, I had to ask myself some tough questions. Could I justify continuing to work for this department? I finally realised that although my intentions were good, my involvement had implicated me in these deaths.

Ultimately, I chose to leave the department rather than to continue to implement policies that: sent people back to their homelands risking their death; allowed people to drown in Australian and Indonesian waters; and detained people indefinitely in harsh conditions, with limited access to water, food and medical treatment. Unequivocally, we Australians are causing severe mental and physical harm to fellow human beings.

In the American justice system, if you witness a crime and do nothing to try and stop it, you are guilty by association. However, Australians do not have this obligation. This perplexes me, as the legal system should be a reflection of our morals and values. Protecting the vulnerable in society should not be choice but a moral obligation. In the end, if you do not help save someone’s life, you are, in some measure, responsible for their death.

Amid all the proud flag-waving this Australia Day weekend, I was unable to raise my flag. I did not feel comfortable celebrating the current pain Australia is causing other human beings and I know I was not alone.

Many Australians cannot frankly face the implications of our governments’ policies that deny others’ human rights and terrorise vulnerable people seeking our help. But we pretend we are not involved, that we do not know what is happening or we deny responsibility.

Every Sunday, Catholics like Tony Abbot attend church to remember Jesus’ life and his struggle to spread peace and stop unnecessary suffering. On Anzac Day we remember all those who have died at war and we say “lest we forget”. However, we appear to have forgotten what it means — that we should not forget the past: that people have died in many wars to help bring peace.

We can remember our past and learn from it, we can remember our journeys and celebrate our achievements. And, living in the present, we can forgive past mistakes and commit to not repeat them. When we see a problem we should try to resolve it quickly so it does not escalate into a crisis and harm us or others.

A civilisation is judged by how it treats the most vulnerable. I fear Australia has been found guilty of crimes against humanity, and no one seems able to talk about it, to reflect on what is being done.

If someone is in trouble it is our responsibility to help them out. We should not let people drown at sea; we should bring them safely to our shores. Once here, they should not be left to languish in interminable limbo, but helped to get on with their lives and to contribute meaningfully to Australia, like so many migrants who have come before them."
------------------------------------------------------

Written By ex-imagration officer Lauren Smith.
Everything Morrison is up to is about de-humanising asylum seekers, the less you see the less you know the less you care, and that plays well to many australians as evidenced by many posters to this thread.
 
Orr, in reply to ex Immigration officer Lauren Smith.

I can only agree with her sentiments and emotions pertaining to certain refugees but it must be remembered Australia has a relatively small population with limited resources to be able to provide for refugees......There are millions who would like to come to Australia and we Australians do provide for a certain quota each year and it must be carried out in an orderly and systematic fashion in keeping to what we can provide and afford......Those who are que jumping on illegal boats are not worthy of the privileges we provide especially when their ID's are destroyed before arriving on our shores..

I am sure, we Australians would all agree, preference should be given to those who are legitimate arrivals with the correct documentation, those who have a reasonalbe undertsanding of the English language, those who could be gainfully employed, those who are willing to settle in less populated areas and not in major city ghettos and above all those who are not religious fanactics who are hell bent on imposing their beliefs on our community.....They should be prepared to accept out way of life in their adopted country and if they can't, then they should return to their country of origin....We certainly don't need refugees who are willing to accept welfare handouts for the rest of their lives and so be a burden to the Auatralian tax payers.....we should have the choice as to who would be suitable and willing to work and dovetail into our community.

We don't need a repeat of what is happening in France and the UK where we have Muslims closing off streets so they can show their strength by praying 5 times a day....these are not the type of refugees we need here in Australia.

I am sorry....but that is the way I feel.
 
My reply to ex Immigration officer Lauren Smith is far simpler.

The foundation of any immigration program is that the country of destination is in control and is thus orderly. Other aspects such as numbers and skilled vs humanitarian can then be built on that.

Immigration by illegal people smuggling operations does not satisfy that basic requirement and the mentioning of the holocaust at the beginning of the article doesn't change that.
 


Sorry Doc when people are fleeing terror you might just expect things to be a 'little disorderly', I know I would be.
As reported on the ABC's 11pm02/02/2014 radio national news, A Sri Lankan Journalist has been murdered( Multiple Knife wounds)... more details to follow... Maybe Andrew Bolt would swollow the Sri Lankan Governmet line of 'domestic tiff', as no doubt will you.

My preference would of been that more pertinence was put on the 'Nuremberg defence' in Ms Smiths article, as opposed to any to the reference 'holocaust ' .
Some times People just have to stand up; Warrant Officer Hugh Thompson actions during the 'Mia Lia Massacre' are one such example.
And noco, yeh there's a lot of'em, and whilst governments play lick spittle to regimes that create them there'll only ever be more...
 
Sorry Doc when people are fleeing terror you might just expect things to be a 'little disorderly', I know I would be.
Over 50,000 boat arrivals, a $12bn cost and counting and over 1,000 deaths at sea not disorderly enough ?

And that from a government who near the end of their 6-year ideological bender conceded this,

BOB CARR: They're coming from majority religious or ethnic groups in the countries their fleeing, they're coming here as economic migrants.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-26/senior-labor-figures-comment-on-leadership-change/4784010

Consider for a moment how many of those 1,000 might still be alive today had the previous Rudd/Gillard not gone down the path they did.

As a matter of basic principal, human civilisation has grown through order, not disorder.
 
The Refugee Review Tribunal needs a clean out,


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nat...-asylum-granted/story-fn9hm1gu-1226815334475#
 
Interesting piece today in The West Australian.

It looks like another one of those orange lifeboats have been put into service.


http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/
 
Interesting piece today in The West Australian.

It looks like another one of those orange lifeboats have been put into service.

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/

From the above article,

An orange life boat has turned up on the coast of Java last night carrying 34. Two resisted and were not transferred to the life boat.

Could they be these two ?

Earlier this week Mr Morrison told an Australian newspaper that two asylum seekers were transferred for medical treatment, one of them for a heart condition.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-02-...ylum-seekers-lands-on-indonesia-coast/5243990

The next OSB operational update is due tomorrow.
 
Chris Bowen and SHY whinge about the latest orange lifeboat turning up on the shores of Java while the asylum tide turns in SE Asia.


http://www.news.com.au/national/the...olicy-is-working/story-fncynjr2-1226820087354
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...