disarray
Because you don't understand what being a "racist" means, does not mean you are not one.
Of course this forum is too politically correct to allow me to call you a racist. So I will not.
You are, however, as ill informed as the many that think they know what is wrong, and what aborigines need to do to lift themselves from where they are.
call me a racist if you want, that word means very little any more because it has been overused. true racism is a belief that certain people are less human because of race. i don't believe in sub humanity, but i do believe in inferiority and superiority. thats the way nature makes us.
i can tell you however that there is nothing ill informed about the fact that I, my girlfriend, my brother, his girlfriend and several of my close friends have been assaulted by aborigines, it is unsafe to walk around my area at night because of aborigines, buses stop running to my area because of aborigines, and my property is constantly vandalised and stolen by aborigines. but it's all my fault because i am a white oppressor and i should apologise and keep throwing money at the problem without making demands to make this all go away right?
spaghetti said:
Aborigines are not migrants, I say once again. I see no proof. If a population radiates out from it's centre it does not constitute migration. Do you have proof those first peoples actually immigrated? Sounds weird to me
https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html
aborigines are migrants, traceable to 3 genetic markers over 30,000 odd years. does it sound wierd to you as well that there have been several other hominid species in recent history that have completely died out? possibly exterminated by our own species. don't worry though, no one can attach any guilt for that to you.
spaghetti said:
I have also read market addicts drink more than average, die younger and have higher levels of stress. Maybe we can relate.
no we can't. hopefully though we are both making a profit so all is well if we can relate there.
spaghetti said:
After 200 years we still label them all "indigenous" and try a one size fits all approach if the carrot and stick method doesn't work
i don't see much stick in current approaches to aboriginal policy. in the judiciary sure, but policy? no.
spaghetti said:
If you do not like people that are so very Australian, more so than you are
wrong wrong wrong. aborigines are not the ultimate australian or whatever you are trying to make them. they are just another wave of homo sapiens sapiens settling in a new and abundant land (which they managed to rape quickly enough).
what i did find amusing a while ago is that mosman council made a big song and dance about hoisting an aboriginal flag over their council chambers and the usual platitudes about reconciliation, reparations, brotherhood of man blah blah blah. you don't find any aborigines in mosman though. its easy to be tolerant of people (and judge others who aren't) when you don't have to live with them.
something relevant from wikipedia, where the channon christian case has been whitewashed by political correctness once again
“Wherever multiculturalism goes, it brings Victimism with it. Victimism is an integral part of the multi-culti ideological package, and its practitioners, whom we may call Victimists, have two principal concerns: They invent fake stories and images that are intended to bring sympathy, admiration, glory and political advantage to groups of people who have been officially designated as Victims by the multi-culti establishment; and they strive to disseminate their fake stories and images in the guise of “history.”
The Victims are always groups, not individuals. This isn’t surprising, because all multi-culti ideology revolves around tribalism, the rejection of individualism, and the doctrine that a person’s primary identity is his group identity ”” i.e., the tribe to which he belongs.
In practice, all the principal tribes turn out to be racial or quasiracial groups, which are defined in terms of their real or imaginary ancestries.
Among the racial groups represented in the population of the United States, two have not merely been certified as Victims but have also been selected for especially lavish treatment by the Victimists. These groups ”” Amerindians and American blacks ”” figure prominently in the multi-culti version of “American history,” where they are sanitized and glorified beyond recognition, and are depicted as the hapless prey of evil white men.
Sanitization is an indispensable part of this endeavor, because certified Victims must always be depicted as innocent, righteous paragons of humanity. The sanitization process consists largely of hiding or denying any facts which show that the Victims had victims of their own, whom they slaughtered, displaced, subjugated, enslaved or exploited." -Prof. William J. Bennetta, EXCERPT from ‘The Textbook Letter’, from July-August 1998
the channon christian case is a white couple being carjacked, taken to a home, the boyfriend sodomised and murdered in front of the girl, then the girl pack raped and urinated on for 4 days before being butchered, cut up and dumped. the media won't touch it though because it was yet another interracial hate crime and would put another crack into the multicult utopian ideal. while not directly pertinent to this conversation, the media whitewash of black atrocity coupled with overreaction to white atrocity is mirrored in our own aboriginal debate.