Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Defending Brett Kavanaugh

Jump to new
Impeachment?

Oh yeah! That would kick it all off, there is a seathing rage in middle America just waiting for an excuse to start shooting "commos".

(just reportage there folks)
 
Anyway he got the job and now Trump is safe as they wont try to impeach him. As the President has a 50% approval rating he's on track for a second term. Odds are favourable for The Republicans keeping a narrow majority in November. Have the Democrats got a candidate better than Trump?
 
Kavanaugh failed basic requirements to be nominated and that accessment came from his peers and ex Supreme Court judge all well outside the political establishment and the he said she said arguments.

The cheering tribalism we won is petty and misses many points.

Republican supporters says how terrible divisive the Democrats have been are naive to the fact that the Repubs changed the senate voting from 60 to 51 hence went from some sort of required consensus for nominations to all out ideological out war weaponizing the Supreme Court for the sake of Republicans this is against the very tenets of the US constitution the Republicans claim to be ardent guardians of.

BTW Democrats are not lefty, they are Repub lite , Repub elitist lite, neoliberalism losers believing in trickle down economics BS just like the Republicans (except they create flooding up economics) and do not represent the best interests of the majority of Americans....fact.
 
IFocus said:
Kavanaugh failed basic requirements to be nominated and that accessment came from his peers and ex Supreme Court judge all well outside the political establishment and the he said she said arguments.

The cheering tribalism we won is petty and misses many points.

Republican supporters says how terrible divisive the Democrats have been are naive to the fact that the Repubs changed the senate voting from 60 to 51 hence went from some sort of required consensus for nominations to all out ideological out war weaponizing the Supreme Court for the sake of Republicans this is against the very tenets of the US constitution the Republicans claim to be ardent guardians of.

BTW Democrats are not lefty, they are Repub lite , Repub elitist lite, neoliberalism losers believing in trickle down economics BS just like the Republicans (except they create flooding up economics) and do not represent the best interests of the majority of Americans....fact.
Click to expand...

ddnths.jpg
 
IFocus said:
Kavanaugh failed basic requirements to be nominated and that accessment came from his peers and ex Supreme Court judge all well outside the political establishment and the he said she said arguments.

The cheering tribalism we won is petty and misses many points.

Republican supporters says how terrible divisive the Democrats have been are naive to the fact that the Repubs changed the senate voting from 60 to 51 hence went from some sort of required consensus for nominations to all out ideological out war weaponizing the Supreme Court for the sake of Republicans this is against the very tenets of the US constitution the Republicans claim to be ardent guardians of.

BTW Democrats are not lefty, they are Repub lite , Repub elitist lite, neoliberalism losers believing in trickle down economics BS just like the Republicans (except they create flooding up economics) and do not represent the best interests of the majority of Americans....fact.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it under Obama's watch that the 60 vote rule was changed in 2013?
 
I find it curious, this habit of jumping to the defence of a man who has been accused of sexual assault..... Yes, in some cases perhaps the man is innocent, but in most they are not, or the allegations would not exist in the first place. Surely there's better causes out there to be passionate about?

I guess the Trump-loving herd will do his bidding without question.
 
IFocus said:
BTW Democrats are not lefty, they are Repub lite , Repub elitist lite, neoliberalism losers believing in trickle down economics BS just like the Republicans (except they create flooding up economics) and do not represent the best interests of the majority of Americans....fact.
Click to expand...

Notwithstanding the nonsense of the deletia, this part of yourpost is a good point. You are correct that this is the majority of the party. However, there is a large minority who are indeed far left... Bernie, Cortez et al. They are being used as useful idiots... But this will surely bite the Dems on the 4ss.

They rely on their vote, but they are now losing them votes as they plumb the luducrous depths of cultural marxism.
 
Tisme, Wiki the basis of all truth ;);)

Dems started down the road GOP god bless them finished the job

"In 2015, Republicans took control of the Senate and kept the 2013 rules in place.[59] Finally, on April 6, 2017, the Senate eliminated the sole remaining exception to the 2013 change by invoking the "nuclear option" for Supreme Court nominees. This was done in order to allow a simple majority to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. The vote to change the rules was 52 to 48 along party lines"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster_in_the_United_States_Senate
 
wayneL said:
Notwithstanding the nonsense of the deletia, this part of yourpost is a good point. You are correct that this is the majority of the party. However, there is a large minority who are indeed far left... Bernie, Cortez et al. They are being used as useful idiots... But this will surely bite the Dems on the 4ss.

They rely on their vote, but they are now losing them votes as they plumb the luducrous depths of cultural marxism.
Click to expand...

Burnie wouldn't get a start in the NSW labor right faction seriously.

Marxism...in the US.....your kidding never ever........never.
 
Junior said:
I guess the Trump-loving herd will do his bidding without question.
Click to expand...

When you create a victims mentality in the herd nonsensical argument using old look over there while stripping conditions and reinforcing modern slavery pay rates with BS such as everyone is better off today than they were 40 years ago everyone goes into the patriots trance.
 
Junior said:
I find it curious, this habit of jumping to the defence of a man who has been accused of sexual assault..... Yes, in some cases perhaps the man is innocent, but in most they are not, or the allegations would not exist in the first place. Surely there's better causes out there to be passionate about?

I guess the Trump-loving herd will do his bidding without question.
Click to expand...

It's not unknown for false allegations to be made, but there are probably many more actual assaults that are not reported.

But what is sexual assault these days ? A pat on the backside ? How many years gaol is that worth ?
 
Dems are now talking about stacking the benches with two additional democrat friendly judges if they win the house.
 
IFocus said:
Tisme, Wiki the basis of all truth ;);)

Dems started down the road GOP god bless them finished the job

"In 2015, Republicans took control of the Senate and kept the 2013 rules in place.[59] Finally, on April 6, 2017, the Senate eliminated the sole remaining exception to the 2013 change by invoking the "nuclear option" for Supreme Court nominees. This was done in order to allow a simple majority to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. The vote to change the rules was 52 to 48 along party lines"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster_in_the_United_States_Senate
Click to expand...

I tend to stay well clear of Wiki, so my goto was the US Senate site:
e.g.
https://www.enzi.senate.gov/public/...under-nuclear-option-minority-will-be-crushed
 
Junior said:
I find it curious, this habit of jumping to the defence of a man who has been accused of sexual assault..... Yes, in some cases perhaps the man is innocent, but in most they are not, or the allegations would not exist in the first place. Surely there's better causes out there to be passionate about?

I guess the Trump-loving herd will do his bidding without question.
Click to expand...

I don't know if anyone was defending him, more the defence of proof and the herd mentality that marches to the beat of men are guilty and women pristine as the pure snow.
 
SirRumpole said:
It's not unknown for false allegations to be made, but there are probably many more actual assaults that are not reported.

But what is sexual assault these days ? A pat on the backside ? How many years gaol is that worth ?
Click to expand...

From my reading US women provide false testimony and US men purger themselves, one is criminal lite and the other is pure evil.

Remember Nayirah Ṣabaḥ and how the US got behind her full throttle ....until
 

Similar threads

bigdog
Bill Shorten: High Flying Fake Or The Worker's Friend
Replies
5
Views
2K
Investoradam
Investoradam
gav
Banks Brace for a Storm of Litigation
Replies
5
Views
4K
mullokintyre
mullokintyre
Top