Where is/can Hillary Clinton take US (sic)?

[basilio]

The Clinton Body Bags.

Perhaps some reality on this rubbish as distinct from lies and constructed deceit ?
Snopes has been fact checking the internet for 20 plus years.

Fact Check

Clinton Body Bags
Decades-old political rumor claims Bill Clinton quietly did away with several dozen people who possessed incriminating evidence about him.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

 

[Logique]

Maybe he knows too much and value his life more than the presidency?

She needs to become President to stay out of jail.

 

[bellenuit]

The Clinton Body Bags.

Perhaps some reality on this rubbish as distinct from lies and constructed deceit ?
Snopes has been fact checking the internet for 20 plus years.


http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp

Thanks Basilio. That article gives examples that prove the point I was making (namely: or that the people involved just have some insignificant connection to the Clintons, but that connection is blown out of proportion to suggest a conspiracy.)

From Snopes:

And, right away, we have come to the first big lie of the "Clinton Body Count" list: Any unexplained death can automatically be attributed to President Clinton by inventing a connection between him and the victim. Mary Mahoney did once work as an intern at the White House, but so have hundreds of other people who are all still alive. There is no credible reason why, of all the interns who have served in the Clinton White House, Mahoney alone would be the target of a Clinton-directed killing. (Contrary to public perception, very few interns work in the West Wing of the White House or have any contact with the President. The closest most interns get to the chief executive is a single brief handshake or group photo.

The problem with conspiracy believers is that they will believe no matter what the case.

 

[DB008]

LOL @Hillary

​

Don't worry, Wikileaks will provide the info soon enough.

 

[qldfrog]

LOL @Hillary

​

Don't worry, Wikileaks will provide the info soon enough.

wahhh amazing.

 

[DB008]

Thanks Basilio. That article gives examples that prove the point I was making (namely: or that the people involved just have some insignificant connection to the Clintons, but that connection is blown out of proportion to suggest a conspiracy.)

From Snopes:

And, right away, we have come to the first big lie of the "Clinton Body Count" list: Any unexplained death can automatically be attributed to President Clinton by inventing a connection between him and the victim. Mary Mahoney did once work as an intern at the White House, but so have hundreds of other people who are all still alive. There is no credible reason why, of all the interns who have served in the Clinton White House, Mahoney alone would be the target of a Clinton-directed killing. (Contrary to public perception, very few interns work in the West Wing of the White House or have any contact with the President. The closest most interns get to the chief executive is a single brief handshake or group photo.

The problem with conspiracy believers is that they will believe no matter what the case.

​

 

[DB008]

DNC caught with their pants down....

​

 

[DB008]

Part 1
DNC - Clinton rigging the election

​

Part 2
People Petition started

This man has been linked to a persons campaign who is running in the election and has a clear bias to one candidate. His ownership of voting machines in 16 states is clear breach of integrity of our electoral system.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-people-ask-congress-meet-emergency-session-about-removing-george-soros-owned-voting-machines-16-states​

 

[bellenuit]

View attachment 68553​

Just looking at the first of your posts, because people die it doesn't mean that the Clintons arranged for their deaths. There was nothing suspicious about any of those 3 deaths, other than what the conspiracy theorists try to drum up.



Coroner Mary Hassell […] was satisfied [from the CCTV footage] that “nobody else was involved”. Recording a narrative verdict, Ms Hassell said she could not be certain that Mr Jones intended to kill himself because the balance of his mind was affected. Ms Hassell said: “John Jones died instantaneously when he jumped in front of a moving train. However, the state of his mental health at the time meant that he lacked the necessary intent to categorise this as suicide.”

http://investmentwatchblog.com/wikileaks-lawyers-death-ruled-not-suicide/

Michael Ratner died of cancer aged 72

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/may/12/michael-ratner-obituary

Gavin MacFadyen, director of the Centre for Investigative Journalism and adviser to the Bureau, has died after a short illness.

https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2016/10/23/gavin-macfadyen-adviser-bureau-dies/

 

[Logique]

My main concern now is that if The Donald snares the upset win - we may see a post-Brexit-like slump on world markets.

 

[Gringotts Bank]

My main concern now is that if The Donald snares the upset win - we may see a post-Brexit-like slump on world markets.

Yes, actually I think we'll get this either way.

 

[McLovin]

My main concern now is that if The Donald snares the upset win - we may see a post-Brexit-like slump on world markets.

That's the least of our worries in that unlikely event. I'm far more worried about a nuclear arms race on our doorstep.

 

[Knobby22]

My main concern now is that if The Donald snares the upset win - we may see a post-Brexit-like slump on world markets.

It would be massive, especially since the market has priced in a Hilary win. Make Brexit look like a sideshow.

my take of the options is:

One leader that will increase spending on infrastructure hoping to create additional work while taxing the wealthy to pay for it. Otherwise everything stays much the same which really isn't good enough.

or another leader that will try to do something about the debasement of Democracy in Washington, encourage the gas industry, put up tariff walls, cut taxes proportionally favouring the wealthy and increase defence spending. If this did occur will greatly increase the debt of the nation, which is a worry.

 

[Gringotts Bank]

Obama reading tweets on a talk show last night. Every time he appears on my screen I'm struck by his fake swagger - the ultra-slow movements, the constant buying of cheap laughs. A try-hard, blow-hard. I really am a cool dude... watch how slowly I move...yehhhh soooo cooool, sooo hip. Reminds me of an early Kev-0-sev. "Hey guys...I'm here to help".

 

[qldfrog]

It would be massive, especially since the market has priced in a Hilary win. Make Brexit look like a sideshow.

my take of the options is:

One leader that will increase spending on infrastructure hoping to create additional work while taxing the wealthy to pay for it. Otherwise everything stays much the same which really isn't good enough.

or another leader that will try to do something about the debasement of Democracy in Washington, encourage the gas industry, put up tariff walls, cut taxes proportionally favouring the wealthy and increase defence spending. If this did occur will greatly increase the debt of the nation, which is a worry.

Knobby22, you should stop reading and believing the crap fed daily in the media; where did you see Trump suggesting increased military spending as opposed to Hillary?Trump wants to bring the GI home, and I do favor that.
The anti Trump movement is so grotesque it is ridiculous;
As stated in the Trump thread i am getting more and more worried by Hillary: Trump will be/is a clown but i do not believe he is a dangerous one for us aka outside the US, whereas Hillary scares the s**t out of me ; especially in relation to Russia (as she can not take China on, the former USSR are the next in line)
Interesting article I found today which means I am not the only one thinking so:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-26/the-election-of-hillary-clinton-promises-a-more-dangerous-world/7966336
Sorry to damper your enthousiasm....

 

[luutzu]

Knobby22, you should stop reading and believing the crap fed daily in the media; where did you see Trump suggesting increased military spending as opposed to Hillary?Trump wants to bring the GI home, and I do favor that.
The anti Trump movement is so grotesque it is ridiculous;
As stated in the Trump thread i am getting more and more worried by Hillary: Trump will be/is a clown but i do not believe he is a dangerous one for us aka outside the US, whereas Hillary scares the s**t out of me ; especially in relation to Russia (as she can not take China on, the former USSR are the next in line)
Interesting article I found today which means I am not the only one thinking so:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-26/the-election-of-hillary-clinton-promises-a-more-dangerous-world/7966336
Sorry to damper your enthousiasm....

In the last couple of debates, Trump talks about America being "weak" - so weak it's unbelievable folks. America being behind the nuclear thing... so Trump will make it strong and make it great again.

So Hillary supporters will take such statements and say Trump is pro nuclear and pro-military. Which is true. But what they might not see is that Hillary is just as, if not more, militaristic as Trump ever dream he could be.

So maybe Trump is just an idiot who doesn't know how much the US is militarily ahead of the world; or that he is aware of the size but thought it's not good enough.

Clinton, on the other hand, know the size, and are setting the ground works for confrontation with Russia. Hopefully not directly as that'll go nuclear... but it'll kill a whole lot of brown folks whose leadership have yet to go "moderate" and obey what uncle Sam says.

 

[luutzu]

Obama reading tweets on a talk show last night. Every time he appears on my screen I'm struck by his fake swagger - the ultra-slow movements, the constant buying of cheap laughs. A try-hard, blow-hard. I really am a cool dude... watch how slowly I move...yehhhh soooo cooool, sooo hip. Reminds me of an early Kev-0-sev. "Hey guys...I'm here to help".

I seriously cannot stand more than 5 seconds of Obama man. Each time he's on TV I have to get up and quickly switch channel.

 

[Gringotts Bank]

I seriously cannot stand more than 5 seconds of Obama man. Each time he's on TV I have to get up and quickly switch channel.

Yeh it's all show. If he was just himself without all the affectations he might be ok. He tries to act like the most moderate, considered, wise cool dude because he knows these things are likable. They're only likable qualities when they're real! He puts more effort into the smooth timing of his speech, movements and comedic quips than his policies.

 

[CanOz]

Yeh it's all show. If he was just himself without all the affectations he might be ok. He tries to act like the most moderate, considered, wise cool dude because he knows these things are likable. They're only likable qualities when they're real! He puts more effort into the smooth timing of his speech, movements and comedic quips than his policies.

Don't forget that allot of Obama's policies were at the mercy of the rebloodlicans....

 

[CanOz]

You're a piece of work Lu, i would not have picked you for Trumpy, but i guess desperation has got to you too....