- Joined
- 5 October 2011
- Posts
- 896
- Reactions
- 0
can I play?
put me down for Long XJO , Short all the property indexes except Perth. $1m per side
hypothetically.
XJO long
can I play?
put me down for Long XJO , Short all the property indexes except Perth. $1m per side
hypothetically.
3. Daytona Beach, Fla.3 of 10
Median home price in 2012: $114,000
Projected home price in 2015: $123,282
Projected annual rent in 2015: $11,048
In a market like Daytona Beach, where the median home price is down to $91,000, most homes are very affordable. But many locals still aren't buying.
"By and large, single-family homes are not priced beyond the reach of renters," said Winzer. But bad credit histories, often due to past mortgage payment problems brought on by Florida's severe housing bust, have made it difficult for many local residents to get mortgages, forcing many to rent.
For real estate investors, that means there's plenty of demand.
And the risks associated with renting in the area, which was hit hard by the housing bust and recession, have also started to subside. Unemployment dropped by 1.9 percentage points to 8.7% over the past 12 months.
Even with the lingering economic issues in the area, there's a lot of potential reward, according to Winzer. The estimated return for landlords in Daytona is about four percentage points higher than the national; average, according to HomeVestors.
NEXT: Orlando, Fla.
I went to three auctions in Melbourne over the weekend. None of them sold, and there was a dismal turnout. I found out one of them ended up negotiating with a bidder for slightly more, but they still got about $35-40k less than they wanted. The sellers were wanting to leave Australia though so they had to sell. Some people will hold onto them and wait longer, but if prices keep sliding it doesn't look like they will recoup any losses they incur from this point forward.
Also at the moment it looks as though even the most optimistic forecasts involve price stagnation. If prices stay the same, you're going backwards @ 3% p/a on average (inflation) so after 5 years, that's 15%. a $52,000 loss. Then you've got to factor in the transaction costs of selling the place, so you'd be bleeding upwards of 20%.
I am looking at buying in 2017/18 at this point, I think after about 5-6 years of steady falls or stagnation I will be able to buy one comfortably, especially if I am able to invest money in another area and have it compound, although with all the doom and gloom I am not banking on very high returns in shares. Possibly a slight appreciation in the price of my Gold and Silver collection but thats about it.
That's interesting. I had a look through the Auction results for last weekend and noticed quite a few places around my area passed in for well below the reserve. Even saw a few where the later offers were lower than the vendor bid!
We originally thought we would buy in one or two years (from a year ago) but are now thinking of a longer time frame too, maybe five years.
Another thing I am noticing is rentals being offered for 6 month leases. As a renter this doesn't appeal to me as the last thing I want to be doing is moving every 6 months. I am also seeing rentals being offered for sale after not being let, and houses for sale being listed for rent after not selling.
Short leases usually spell high demand expect rental increases at expiry also. when thing soften 1+ year leases become common. everything is playing out nicely weve had the boom and the price contraction now increasing yeilds no just in relation to price but in real terms lower holding costs via record low interest rates, just a matter of time before it becomes a no brainer only problem will be once it starts showing in the figures most will have already missed exactly what they were holding out to catch.
Short leases usually spell high demand expect rental increases at expiry also. when thing soften 1+ year leases become common. everything is playing out nicely weve had the boom and the price contraction now increasing yeilds no just in relation to price but in real terms lower holding costs via record low interest rates, just a matter of time before it becomes a no brainer only problem will be once it starts showing in the figures most will have already missed exactly what they were holding out to catch.
Rental demand high, high prices, long leases > benefits landlord
Short leases, low prices > low demand - landlords are trying to just get someone in. There is no benefit to the landlord having a high turnover in tenants and if demand was high tenants would be forced into the above.
Glad to see Sparticus that you are persistant but unfortunately overgeared to matter.
Landlords are finding it hard to get tennants around my area, properties are typically spending some time empty before getting tennants (the place we are in now was advertised for over two months, was vacant before we moved in and we were the only applicant). Many properties having to drop the rental price before getting tennants.
I was wondering if some of these properties offering only 6 month leases were really houses that the owners want to sell but can't so they think they will let them for 6 months until - hopefully - the market picks up then they'll put them back on the market. Another theory I had was that landlords are being told by by agents to offer the property at a lower rent (because demand is low) to get someone in and then increase the rent when - hopefully - the rental market picks up in 6 months.
Getting $460 1brd 12km direct line from city turned over tennants mid dec2011 and still had somone in 3 days latter 6 month lease . As always in life you get what you pay for i guess.
So youngung are you in the long lease = high demand camp ala satan ¿ 24 month should spell some pretty high demand according to him
What city are you refering to im sparticus? My experience in Melbourne is very different.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.