- Joined
- 2 October 2006
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reactions
- 2
i was given the new web address for couch oil.. see if you can find any reference to SL in it.. i havent yet.. all news from them is still off site and by email only..
http://www.cboil.net
I see the new presentation on ADI's site put the secondary at 170 BCF, which is still by all accounts is way way short of the expected reserves after the acerage is signed up and the testing is done.
NT is 40 BCF to 80 BCF.
we could be sitting on a minimum of 250BCF and not factoring in any of the oil, and the share price is at a staggering .60
up until a few weeks ago, the sugarloaf play was undoubtedly being kept very very low key, and for the reasons of getting further acerage accross ALL DEPTHS on the sugarloaf leases. its amazing that they find it important to let you know that. but the austin secondary play was a very late addition in the wells history, and it seems that now the JVP's have got a fairly comfortable position, they are suddenly talking up the sugarloaf secondary.
from the very ultra conservative 40bcf to the conservative 170 BCF and not taking into account maybe 72mmb, and still no testing being done on the well which by all accounts will deliver even further clarity in respect to reserves which all jvp's have openly admitted are under the estimates so far projected.
i would say that still today, the share is without doubt brilliant value. for adi to post 170 BCF says to me they wouldnt do so unless they were absolutely certain it couldnt be remotely overestimated, and totally safe as an conservative estimate.
anyone see the same picture developing?
all IMHO and dyor
http://www.cboil.net
I see the new presentation on ADI's site put the secondary at 170 BCF, which is still by all accounts is way way short of the expected reserves after the acerage is signed up and the testing is done.
NT is 40 BCF to 80 BCF.
we could be sitting on a minimum of 250BCF and not factoring in any of the oil, and the share price is at a staggering .60
up until a few weeks ago, the sugarloaf play was undoubtedly being kept very very low key, and for the reasons of getting further acerage accross ALL DEPTHS on the sugarloaf leases. its amazing that they find it important to let you know that. but the austin secondary play was a very late addition in the wells history, and it seems that now the JVP's have got a fairly comfortable position, they are suddenly talking up the sugarloaf secondary.
from the very ultra conservative 40bcf to the conservative 170 BCF and not taking into account maybe 72mmb, and still no testing being done on the well which by all accounts will deliver even further clarity in respect to reserves which all jvp's have openly admitted are under the estimates so far projected.
i would say that still today, the share is without doubt brilliant value. for adi to post 170 BCF says to me they wouldnt do so unless they were absolutely certain it couldnt be remotely overestimated, and totally safe as an conservative estimate.
anyone see the same picture developing?
all IMHO and dyor