Trembling Hand
Can be found on the bid
- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 8,852
- Reactions
- 205
Sorry i cant agree with that, as the US Mortgage Carnage thread shows, the subprime issue was alive and well back in March, and well before then. So why werent people running for the hills then? No, they decide to risk their money for another 4 months? I think not. This is more a media driven beat up IMO, bad news sells papers. Not to say there isnt some effect from this subprime problem, but the general public has no real idea what lies beneath and are merely jumping at their own shadows.
Ive seen people posting the big money left the building ages a go via the back door. Well judging by the number of Insto shareholding and Director holding increases, IMO they are silently slipping back in, while the plebs quiver in their boots
Wavepicker. You had today as an important date, think as a possible high using EW. I had it pegged as danger day months back on the possibility of some nasty selling in the Materials sector. Well I was a bit late on that but still am interested to see what plays out here.
Whats your thoughts still see this time as important?
The media has no influencial in our society, including markets? I would hesitantly disagree with that brush.Totally disagree with your argument here. The media moves the markets, how ridiculous.
Hello TH
Yes that was 20-22nd August as high. However the time point "inverted" between that post and now. By that I mean that we got another important time point which was a high on the 31st July. Subsequently the August 20th date then became a low instead , however this came 2-3 days earlier than I expected.
The this rally should persist till the 3rd week of September, perhaps a little beyond as the next rotation which is a high is due then. The next rottation after that which should coincide with a low is appox mid November. So I am expecting the current trend up to persist if I am reading it correctly, but what sort of trend will this be?? It might be a choppy trend that chews up time until then??. Let's see
The media has no influencial in our society, including markets? I would hesitantly disagree with that brush.
Individual investors are influenced by what people say on this forum. Extrapolate that.
I'm very interested in media/social dynamics and whether it's the public that moves the media, or media moving the people, and I think we could be somewhere in a whirpool situation, where one triggers the other, triggers the other, and momentum kicks in creating a vortex which sucks everything around and down with it. You can't discount the media's influence in creating a crash. If there was NO communication, and interpretation, then we'd be sitting around twiddling our thumbs, wondering what to do.Ohhhh the media does have influence on our society alright, but it does not move the markets. If it did then I would not waste my studying charts , just think about it Kennas just read the paper and you know what the market is gonna do the next day!!!!! If only it was that easy
Almost as ridiculous as an "invisible hand" wouldn't you say?Totally disagree with your argument here. The media moves the markets, how ridiculous. Once again, another example of someone trying to justify why the market has done what it has done.
I'm very interested in media/social dynamics and whether it's the public that moves the media, or media moving the people, and I think we could be somewhere in a whirpool situation, where one triggers the other, triggers the other, and momentum kicks in creating a vortex which sucks everything around and down with it. You can't discount the media's influence in creating a crash. If there was NO communication, and interpretation, then we'd be sitting around twiddling our thumbs, wondering what to do.
In the mean time, we'll continue to overshoot, and undershoot, and it's important to make the most of those opportunites, IMO.
The market forces are internal, dynamic, and feed upon themselves. Social trends are pathological, there is nothing you can do start them or stop them. All you can do is participate or get out of the way if positioned in the wrong way.
The market turned because it turned, it will do what it wants when it wants to. Trade what you see not what you want or expect to happen.
~~
Yes that was 20-22nd August as high. However the time point "inverted" between that post and now. ~~
- It's still trending upKennas,
-decide if the market is trending
-participating with that trend
-determine when the trend is at risk of ending
This completely analytical approach to a social science cannot be right.
I get the feeling that this is an argument on which neither side will budge so maybe there is not much point in writing this. But I know what has made me fearful in the current climate - screaming headlines of doom and gloom. Maybe it is just me and I am not a cold clinician of a mythical beast that does as it chooses?
- It's still trending up
- I've participated in it going up
- I've done my best to participate in it going down (not very successfully - I'm crap at shorts)
- It is at risk of ending
It hasn't ended yet.
PS, this chart would look much better on a semi log.
WP, I don't quite understand the 'question'.Kennas,
What if the devil came to you one day and gave you the newspaper headlines, big stories, economic data for the next year.
Do you think you could successfully trade the market with this information in those 12 months???
Bushman, just to continue the discussion on your view,
"To say that the media has no influence on the market is fallacy.".
I see the media influence sending prices higher than they might otherwise be, or in a down trend sending them lower than might otherwise be the case. However I do not see them reversing anything but a minor trend.
This is one reason why I like WP's view of plotting time rather than price.
This post is remarkable. To deny a human element in market movements is ludicrous. How can you say that the market will do what it wants to when it wants to? It is not some mythical demigod to be in awe off. It is shaped by human emotion and desire as much as it is shaped by human logic. Those that can stand apart from the rhetoric will do the best. This completely analytical approach to a social science cannot be right.
To say that the media has no influence on the market is fallacy. The media is the most powerful influence in our society. If you want to take media influence to an extreme, one day read about how the media was used in whipping up genocidal practices in Rwanda, Germany etc. It shapes people's decisions and taps into the primordial fearful response. What do we read about - crime, political scandal, celebrity scandal, market collapses, pandemics, global warming, Y2K. Fear sells newspapers by the truckload and what better combination than fear and financial safety.
I get the feeling that this is an argument on which neither side will budge so maybe there is not much point in writing this. But I know what has made me fearful in the current climate - screaming headlines of doom and gloom. Maybe it is just me and I am not a cold clinician of a mythical beast that does as it chooses?
Aren't waves and time based on logic? Since we're getting into the nitty gritty.In fact what seems logical is usually what does not happen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?