- Joined
- 12 November 2007
- Posts
- 1,629
- Reactions
- 47
Indicators are not totally useless. They can be handy some of the time but probably the bigger issue is that a lot of the people using them are useless. Like most methods - EW, tapereading, price action, dartboard.
TH, I don't understand what you mean here, what do you mean "Like most methods...."? They are all useless? What is useless about the people using them?
BTW, I'm not disagreeing, just wondering what you mean if you say "indicators are not useless" but then finish off saying "like most methods"?
I'm saying peoples use of the tools are wrong. People become religiously attached to methods believing they are the source of success and just like religion defend them to the death. Without ever considering their failures. Without considering the times that their success is fitted to their experience recalling the right pattern at the right time rather than the pattern being right. Subconsciously or consciously recalling the right process at the right time due to building up a big database of experience & patterns.
My thinking is moving more and more to the yes you can be right more than wrong, yes you can time the market - even to the minutes, yes they are chaotic but certainly not random. Its not TA its not FA its EA - Experienced Analysis (recalling the right type of analysis/pattern at the right time).
Have a look at the H & S thread. At last count 23% correct!! FFS!! Thats a disaster. Have a look at OWGs near on 8 months of incorrect calls based on EW!! F Me!! Its not the method its the users poor application of fitting the wrong pattern at the wrong time.
People learn patterns/traditional TA (H&S, EW, Double tops etc) then go and look for these patterns in markets. Thats a Farkin insane approach. That's like teaching doctors disease cures before they know anatomy 101 or learn diagnostic skills. No other "professional" learning development is as stuffed up and ar$e about as trading - and the results are there to prove it
what most people tend to forget is that buying and selling a stock mainly means dealing with other people. When you buy a stock, it means that you find it "cheap". It also means that someone else finds it "expensive". This means that the concepts of "cheap" and "expensive" had better be measured against the group of traders who are active in the stock instead of against some other measure. Why is this? The simple answer is that on the stock market, we are not trading "reality", but rather the perception of that reality. Therefore, instead of talking about "cheap" or "expensive", we'd better talk about "expectation". Pascal Willian
$20shoes I agree but beamstas will not. The obvious response to your comment for the price action only guys is you don't need RSI or any other indicator to tell you we are "oversold" when the Index gets halved in a year!!
And that a bounce is due after the leverage is cleaned out and acceleration down slows.
Indicators are not totally useless. They can be handy some of the time but probably the bigger issue is that a lot of the people using them are useless. Like most methods - EW, tapereading, price action, dartboard.
Exception being Gann which well all know is a fraud, the Gannist continually prove that for us.
Its not the method its the users poor application of fitting the wrong pattern at the wrong time.
Multiples don't look very attractive at 5000 by the end of the year (which is what some people have been predicting)
bearing in mind - the US is the dog and we're the tail - the US consumer (representing 70% of US GDP) has lost another 1% of real disposable income in July and nearly 10% of Americans are out of a job
Yeah the dow reminds me of a hot air balloon ready to pop!Well really has the information from wall street ever looked good?Just a rally im following at the moment.But slowly selling out of postion,at the moment only 30% of my portfolio is in the market(not much faith in this pack of cards at the moment).
Be more confident to see a correction.
bearing in mind - the US is the dog and we're the tail - the US consumer (representing 70% of US GDP) has lost another 1% of real disposable income in July and nearly 10% of Americans are out of a job
A trend channel of the rally so far.
The vertical lines?
Ummmm, I had a few drinks on the weekend and drew in the days of the full moon.
My experience with trend channels is that they break to the side its trending, before correcting savagely and forming a countertrend.
is it because the US 10-year bond market (which is down at 3.45% again - pricing in a correction of the market) is telling them a different story to that of Wall Street... soon one is going to have to correct itself
Agree - has been very worthwhile paying attention to the US bonds lately, wrt the Chinese mkt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?