- Joined
- 9 September 2005
- Posts
- 209
- Reactions
- 0
See this is where everyone has a great deal of problems with changing wave counts.
They have to change as the market is dynamic and will show onething at one time and then over time be something else.
To attempt to demonsrate
You could have been long from the bottom of the ABC corrective move
Initial target for this move is 4388 which seems to be close to other types of analysis targets
I too have been trading long for the past couple of weeks, regardless of the different counts for EW.
Bloody brilliant.
This is what I've been looking at "87 vs 08". Take a look at the same periods in the same time frames. Both hit in the month of October. Both falls were approx 50%, yes. With the second lows (3 months later) late Feb88 & early March09. From there "both" rebounded, some 26 percent, then side ways / dropped back a little over a couple of months.... very similar. So after the "dropped back a little" the low in 88 was in June then the market rallied a further 15% in a month!
Will we now see a 15% rise in July or there abouts?
With the time frames and rebounds being so similar I agree that it appears to be based purely (as Nomore4's put it) “around the psychology of the market participants.” Either that or manipulation at its best, LOL. Coincidence?
Looking for 15.
That sounds like a beautiful "Type 1 Trade" to me. Well done!You could have been long from the bottom of the ABC corrective move
I have been since 14/07/09 and its been a very good 2 weeks.
Initial target for this move is 4388 which seems to be close to other types of analysis targets.
Yeah the market is dynamic but elliot wave isn’t. It’s a big lagging lump of
Those charts demonstrate diddly squat. All they demonstrate is someone place their own counts on it after the fact.
Hindsight at it's best. Tech, make sure you give me the tip next time around
Simple things like trading with the trend often do make you money.
Bloody brilliant.
F me you weren't joking!!
How do you manipulate the market like that
Your last posts on the XAO a while ago made it clear you thought we were at a top, tech. Just over 2 weeks ago actually.Not the end of wave 5 but in wave 5.
Its just labelling it as such.
See this is where everyone has a great deal of problems with changing wave counts.
They have to change as the market is dynamic and will show onething at one time and then over time be something else.
To attempt to demonsrate
on 20/07/09 the count was as the first chart.
on 21/07/09 the count was the second chart.
And still is.
You could have been long from the bottom of the ABC corrective move
I have been since 14/07/09 and its been a very good 2 weeks.
Initial target for this move is 4388 which seems to be close to other types of analysis targets.
Click to Enlarge
Nasdaq
XAO
lining up-- analysis pretty well the same.
Again I dont see much changing from the analysis I have been posting for sometime.
Its weak.
Look with skepticism at long plays and be actively involved in low risk short plays.
You should work on your basic Elliott Guys!!
Both charts WEEKLY
Top chart QQQQ
Bottom ORDS
Click to expand
Readig the market isnt that hard.
This is true.
This is true.
This is more likely.
Yet neither is Crystal clear.
Click to enlarge
Duc.
Is it really that hard?
Nett short currently IS the next big thing.
We have many stocks and many indexes all showing the same signs of weakness.(They are technical signs Duc) They were shown clearly at the beginning of its recent down turn and are very similar to those which you dismissed as utter nonsense when I opened a thread years ago "Perhaps this isn't the top" I presented evidence there which played out.
Presented evidence for the 6880 correction The 3200 wave 3 end wave 4 and now the final wave 5 in this pattern.
Was pretty right.
So was this.
remember a few others about some sort of H&S thingo too.Julia.
Nun asked for realtime examples these were what I pulled up within a few hrs.
Nothing special about those chosen-- just making the point of being on the right side of the market.
Short right now is the right side of the market.
What?
Short right there certainly was the right side of the market.
The problem is?
Evidence at the time was correct.
Further technical evidence presented itself so went long.
What you want a daily commentary?
$500/statement
Happy to oblige.
Short right there certainly was the right side of the market.
The problem is?
Evidence at the time was correct.
What?
$500/statement
Happy to oblige.
just for the record though shorting any instrument when its reaching a double bottom in an uptrend is not recommended
LOL this bit gets me every time!!
cheers tech/a you crack me up
arrghhh why didnt you tell me that before when you saw i was entering shorts! ......
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?