- Joined
- 29 May 2008
- Posts
- 677
- Reactions
- 0
Re: XAO Analysis
what news just hit the american markets? 2am Melbourne time
what news just hit the american markets? 2am Melbourne time
This was a genuine question Porper. GeeshThere is no wonder EW'ers have stopped posting with the constant inuendo's going on.
what news just hit the american markets? 2am Melbourne time
There are too many hopeful festian fundamentalists posting hopeful scenarios of a return to an everlasting bull market.
It is not going to happen, and there is much more money to be lost on the long side.
Present fundamental economic answers seem predicated on socialist principles of bailing out the undeserving and getting the future generations to pay the debt. These attempts will fail.
Charts never lie, and I would suggest on EW principles a low of 2400 for the XAO, possibly at the end of the year, with then a sideways move for 1 or 2 years.
gg
Elliott wave theory has been unfairly targeted in this thread.
It provides useful guidance for long term traders as to possible points at which to attempt to predict the top of a bull trend and in the present case, the bottom of a bear.
There are too many hopeful festian fundamentalists posting hopeful scenarios of a return to an everlasting bull market.
It is not going to happen, and there is much more money to be lost on the long side.
Present fundamental economic answers seem predicated on socialist principles of bailing out the undeserving and getting the future generations to pay the debt. These attempts will fail.
Charts never lie, and I would suggest on EW principles a low of 2400 for the XAO, possibly at the end of the year, with then a sideways move for 1 or 2 years.
gg
Huh? Like where?Elliott wave theory has been unfairly targeted in this thread.
Elliott wave theory has been unfairly targeted in this thread.
Charts never lie, and I would suggest on EW principles a low of 2400 for the XAO, possibly at the end of the year, with then a sideways move for 1 or 2 years.
Well I feel he's pretty close.
But wouldnt rule out a lower low yet.
Other than that-------
With regard to the scaling on that chart, should it be linear (as it is) or non-linear in the form of equal distances in the vertical scale between 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000 etc ?Charts never lie, and I would suggest on EW principles a low of 2400 for the XAO, possibly at the end of the year, with then a sideways move for 1 or 2 years.
gg
no it hasnt GG ----- but it can be arranged :
best get back to my cave methinks :aliena:
Arriving at a make or break point imo.
If this support level holds above the 200d ma, then the bear bounce still has some legs. Massive divergence on the MACD and more than obviously trending lower. Yes, post price movement, but look bloody ugly. A very slightly lower high adding to the bearish view. Could the 200d ma provide some support to the 3700 ish support line?
Obviously a non paid for chart (sorry Beamstas), so someone elses paid for one might look different.
Yes charts don't lie (unless you have the wrong data feed) but humans beliefs and forecasting can be taken as lies.
On a more encouraging note. If what you say is true it will give me a chance to start saving up for the big low. I wonder if they will start closing markets if we get that low.
It took 18 months to fall from ~6800 to ~3100 or around 55%
Now we're going to fall from 4000 to 2400 (-40%) in 6 months?
With regard to the scaling on that chart, should it be linear (as it is) or non-linear in the form of equal distances in the vertical scale between 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000 etc ?
This would obviously impact on how far your analysis suggests the market would fall. 1800 points is about 26% of 7000. A 26% fall from around 4000 would give a target just below 3000.
Linear is a reasonable approximation for movements which are small relative to the index/individual price value but for movements which represent a larger portion of the index value ??The old Fibmeister always went on linear data. Linear.
Its falling
A chart
Linear is a reasonable approximation for movements which are small relative to the index/individual price value but for movements which represent a larger portion of the index value ??
Consider what would happen under your scenario if the first drop was, say 30% of it's peak value and the second was, say 50%.
You and I know that, but the average punter in any market, tomatoes, sugar, oil goes on the linear data.
I go to my local veg/ vegan.crazies market on sunadays whenever I find it difficult to work out charts. I watch the ebb and flow of prices.
It is linear.
Folk trade linear.
gg
But they don't account for a large slice of the mkt do they? Funds and larger guys with better knowledge and access would be using semi-log charts.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.