If this turns into a groundswell like the prime mortgages did we are in for a quick downward run.
To much doom and gloom for me to soon, it will arrive but I suspect a little bit later in the year.
The two gap down days 21 & 22 of Jan still need to be filled. The second gap down being significantly larger than the first.
I see a rally in the next week or so to come up and fill these gaps 4900, maybe the well expected March rally before heading back down to the depths of 4200.
The US is just starting to wake up to the reality that they are drowning in debt and the only course of action to save the empire is to start deleveraging. This reality has not yet sunk in and proved by the reelection of Benake. It will take some time for them to accept that debt is the problem and not the answer, when they realise this, panic and fear will return in full force.
Cheers
I think the U.S. realises that debt is the problem but they need to go further into debt to create the stimulus to create the income to reduce the debt.
The two gap down days 21 & 22 of Jan still need to be filled. The second gap down being significantly larger than the first.
I see a rally in the next week or so to come up and fill these gaps 4900, maybe the well expected March rally before heading back down to the depths of 4200.
Hi T/H,
What data do they look at then?
My source of data is from premiumdata which I assume originates from the ASX but could be wrong.
Cheers
Thanks for the reply T/H, much appreciated but I'm still a little confused.
The two gap down days I mentioned in the XAO chart should not be considered in looking at the future direction of the index because of some twilight zone stuff that happens at the time of open making the data meaningless?
Cheers
Are you going to give more significance to the ones that you see because of a dodgy methodology?
The answer to your question is yes,
Debt does not create real jobs, it just buys time. When the US and the world finally wake up to this reality and the fact that their standard of living must change, watch out down below.
Mate, please read my reply. At no point did I say they were significant, just something that should be taken into consideration. But read into it what you will.
You finally answered the question, wasn't hard was it. You don't place much credence on them, that is all I was asking. No cryptic intentions or hidden messages at all.
Ah, you use the word bias, very interesting, the reason why I started a thread on the subject. The thread was started due to two individuals (who seem very capable traders with lots of knowledge) who seem to have extreme bias towards their own opinions and often clouded that there is more than one way to skin a cat. One of them replied immediately to the thread mentioning the other. Quite funny all in all.
Cheers and thank-you.
EDIT: I also am starting to understand that spending 20 min trying to explain something in an factual way, such as my attempted at post# 209 is a farking waste of time. And more than likely going to end up looking like a tosser. And end up with being labeled one, as per you last remark.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?