This all i will say on this subject,people denying that planes did not fly into the towers have...MASSIVE problems...tb
Good question..From the memory of the footage I've seen it did seem the collapse started with the upper floors generally falling horizontally. That doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that.
Yes, on both sides of the fence. But lets leave that language for the true nutters, not for those who simply disagree with the official line, K?
EXACTLY CHAMP it takes a highly trained team of demolition experts in conjunction with dozens of workers weeks to drill and strategically place explosives to make a building collapse like that but your argueing that a boeing 767 can do it neatly in an hour! How do you explain traces of thermite and molten spots on the base steel structure consistant with demolition explosives found at the site ? Sure i wouldn't believe that I some guy on a forum said it but if you research you'll find it was actually the guy in charge of the clean up / investigation of the site that made the claims.
Your analysis of the steel structure is simply not right, watch the video then do some research then come and argue some points. The bomb in the basement was hundreds of kilo's of high explosive exactly the same type as Oklahoma ! Yeah that building held up real well
A boeing 767 weighs under 100 tonnes and jet fuel burns at 1300 degrees. The buildings were designed to take a hit from a smaller jet but still there is no possible way that it caused that collapse . Steel pillars are extremely strong when you place force on top of them rather than from the side your trying to argue that the weight of 20 floors of WTC is enough to desintergrate 100 floors below into pieces the size of a car
How about the video evidence that shows that the fires weren't even that bad and were by no means hot enough to cause the steel to collapse. Hell even a firefighter reached the 76th level south tower Where it was hit and is recorded as saying there were small localised fires, he was fairly clear that the fires were not a serious threat.
Video taken before the collapse in the lobby area clearly shows tiles dislodged from the walls and cracks in the walls. An explosion over 80 stories up could not have caused that damage. The elevator shafts in the towers aren't continuous there are 3 stages each is atmospherically sealed. The tower manager for maintainance was in the basement at the time and reported a much larger explosion eminating from the basement area just before he felt another explosion that was clearly from the upper floors.
I'm not trying to dis your arguement and I was saying the exact same thing about 6 months ago but in all seriousness you raise two points of why it did happen that way. This documentary alone provides hundreds of clearly undeniably proven facts backedup with evidence from official documents, eye witness reports, expeert testimonies which shoot down every arguement I could think of which would point to it really been a terorist attack.
You know the biggest problem is it is a known fact that at least 6 of the supposed highjackers are alive and well in countries around the world !
Even the pilot that flew the exact plane same ID numebr everything that "flew" into the pentagon has said that the airial manouvers the plane was doing on route to its target were impossible and that the plane would have stalled. His exact words were "it appeared more like the movements of a military aircraft"
This all i will say on this subject,people denying that planes did not fly into the towers have...MASSIVE problems
some even start name calling as they have an absence of facts to back their position.
Yes that was my point. A saw a straw man being built and I am determined to keep that, and other nonsense such as ad hominem insults, right out of this thread.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
