You could try to be on topic.
I have offered my thoughts on it.
On the topic of logic, try not to make an assumption, draw an argument from it, and then present a conclusion.
Logic is in the eye of the beholder, my friend. What you think is logic or what I think is logic, someone else may have an entirely different opinion. I've seen you express viewpoints that I considered completely lacking in logic. Other times you've expressed views that I agree with.
Some people, for example, see no logic in the argument that we, the current generation, should feel guilt or responsibility for the actions of our forefathers hundreds of years ago.
Others feel differently.
Some see logic in the argument that aboriginals are our fellow Australians, therefore we should try to help them out of their problems so they can lead more fulfilling lives, just like we help anyone in this country who needs help, regardless of race or skin colour.
Others feel differently. They see no logic whatever in continuing to pour money into aboriginals who wreck facilities they're given, shun education and work programs designed to help them, and seem content to waste their lives away
They say fence off several million acres of wild country somewhere, hand it back to the aboriginals, and let them fend for themselves without help from the rest of the community.
In any event, no matter what we believe, no matter what we see as logical or illogical, a debate is about putting forward points of view and backing them with solid argument. A debate is won by the side that does the best job of backing his views with solid argument, while at the same time putting forward solid argument to refute the views of his opponent.
The side that fails to present solid argument to support their views and to refute the views of their opponent, gets backed into a corner and ends up losing the debate.