This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
wayneL said:
Your ideology caused you to miss the point Grasshopper.
Click to expand...

And what would we say about a person who uses the hate speech of Paul Watson as a referance ? Luutzu nailed it

"anyway, the world as seen through idiots like this is an ugly place."
 
Ahhh, hate speech. I was waiting for one of the cultural Marxist buzz words to pop up.

Exactly who was Mr Watson preaching hate against? Pointing out the monumental hypocrisy of the left in America does not constitute hate, basilio

Yet Fonda proposes a child is yanked from his mother and given over to be raped by pedophiles, and that the children of govt agents should be targeted, the left just shrugs.

That is hate speech basilio.

In yet another disgusting irony, despite a clear contravention of their terms, Twitter does... absolutely nothing.

Too busy deplatforming ordinary conservatives I guess.

The putrifaction of leftist thought is a disgrace.
 
Last edited:

No she doesn't.

She sued some non-profit organisation in, from memory, her home country because they use her photo in an ad encouraging kids to learn English.

Misuse of her image, her lawyer says. Can't encourage kids to learn and not pay her for the copy rights dude.
 
luutzu said:
Misuse of her image, her lawyer says. Can't encourage kids to learn and not pay her for the copy rights dude.
Click to expand...

Maybe they used it without asking her first. If they did ask she may well have said yes.

Given the hysteria generated by anti refugee sentiments by her husband it showed some guts to run counter to that imo.

If you would care to post some links about Melania's law suit, that would be good, I can't find any.
 
Last edited:


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/melania-trump-threatens-lawsuit-over-english-class-billboard/

The company wasn't non-profit, my bad.

Yea, they use her image without permission, or royalty. Can't have that.

I read that she said she plan to use her image as First Lady to make money [not her exact word ]... so she can't have people using it.

Man, she should know that that's the old way to make money out of this WH gig. You gotta get a title with some influence in it. Like "Senior Adviser"... That way, you'd pulled in an easy $100M a year while Trump is the president.

Wait til later and it's too late.
 
With regard to the separation and imprisonment of US aslyum seekers which has cause such grief to the families and the US public. Could there be a simpler, cheaper and just as effective measure to make sure these people are brought to a court for their hearing ?

In fact .. yes there certainly is. So what is the thinking behind mass separations of families in very expensive detention centers with all the drama that has bee created ?

In border controversy, U.S. ignores tech alternative to detention centers


Wearing an ankle monitor bracelet, a woman who identified herself as Jennifer sits at the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center after recently crossing the U.S.-Mexico border on June 21, 2018, in McAllen, Texas.


Getty


The U.S. government may have a more humane and cost-effective tech alternative to detaining families at the border. But it isn't being offered to the thousands of immigrant families that have been forcibly split over the past two months.

At least not yet.
The majority of undocumented immigrants detained by border patrol agents are enrolled in Immigration and Customs Enforcement's "Alternative to Detention" program, which uses technology to keep track of people instead of physically detaining them.
Since the pilot program kicked off in 2004, these techniques allowed for tracking through ankle bracelets, phone check-ins with voice recognition software and a mobile app. It meant that families could stay together rather than in a detention center.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united...ion-centers-immigration-trump-administration/
 
Smear smear smear.

Wanna tell us about the Clinton Foundation?
 
wayneL said:
Smear smear smear.

Wanna tell us about the Clinton Foundation?
Click to expand...

I'm no fan of Clintons, or any political party.

It's not smear. Still true that she doesn't give a crap.

Turning up for a photo op is not genuine concern.

Elanor Roosevelt... now that's a First Lady that gives a dam.
 
luutzu said:
I'm no fan of Clintons, or any political party.

It's not smear. Still true that she doesn't give a crap.

Turning up for a photo op is not genuine concern.

Elanor Roosevelt... now that's a First Lady that gives a dam.
Click to expand...
Yeah but that was the good old days, grasshopper.

You know, before the Democrats were all marxists.
 
wayneL said:
Yeah but that was the good old days, grasshopper.

You know, before the Democrats were all marxists.
Click to expand...

You do realise that Roosevelt's policies were Marxist right?

Capitalists crashed the US, and the world, economy. Millions were homeless, no jobs programe, no welfare benefits.

Roosevelt put those in place. Regulate the banks and investment companies etc.
 
No they weren't Marxist, but yes they were a collectivist solution, which was actually a very poor one.

They, essentially retarded the US economy, only to be finally activated by ww2 and the baby boom.

Read some of Von Mises Institute analysis of the period... Roosevelt f***ed up.
 



Sure he screwed up.

That's why before his regulation there were market collapses every few years; during his New Deal and regulation the US saw its best days - for everyone; after it was deregulated and "free market" reign, the US is back to market collapses, rising wealth inequality, half the country more; 20% in poverty. Drug epidemic, rising suicide among White Americans.. level not seen since the Civil War and WWII.

But sure, Bush Jr.'s, Obama's, Trump's tax cuts will save the day. Third time lucky.
 
SirRumpole said:
Actually, there is some research around that says he did.

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409
Click to expand...

No. That was when he first took office and tried the now fashionable belt tightening/austerity measure.

That made it worst. Yes.

But with WWII forced on them, massive gov't stimulus and jobs program boosted the economy. etc.

Then come regulation, more stimulus under successive administration. Such as the interstate highways, space programs etc.
 
wayneL said:
For your edification Grasshoppers:

https://mises.org/library/how-fdr-made-depression-worse
Click to expand...

That's another "alternate" sets of facts and misinterpretation of history.

If it weren't for FDR's Marxist/Socialist policies, American democracy would have collapsed about the time Hitler took over democratic Germany.

These neoCon idiots don't know what it was that gave America its golden age. No, A Golden Age is not when greed is good and obscene wealth is gooder.

The current two generations of Americans will see their standard of living lower than that of their parents. And you cannot tell me that that's because there's more regulation and Marxism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

US Election 2024 : Stock and Economic Comment
7 8 9
Replies
171
Views
10K
divs4ever
President Trump 2020-2024: Economic Implications
2 3
Replies
49
Views
6K
divs4ever
Why Donald Trump's Companies Went Bankrupt
Replies
3
Views
2K
noirua
The White House is sinking into a den of iniquity
Replies
3
Views
2K
Tisme
Will smartphones be the end of us?
Replies
10
Views
3K
crackajack2
C
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...