- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,593
- Reactions
- 7,470
And what would we say about a person who uses the hate speech of Paul Watson as a referance ? Luutzu nailed it
"anyway, the world as seen through idiots like this is an ugly place."
Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?
- Thread starter basilio
- Start date
- Status
And what would we say about a person who uses the hate speech of Paul Watson as a referance ? Luutzu nailed it
"anyway, the world as seen through idiots like this is an ugly place."
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
So what was the point?
And don't tell me it was to save the children. Tough love and all that.
wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
Ahhh, hate speech. I was waiting for one of the cultural Marxist buzz words to pop up.
Exactly who was Mr Watson preaching hate against? Pointing out the monumental hypocrisy of the left in America does not constitute hate, basilio
Yet Fonda proposes a child is yanked from his mother and given over to be raped by pedophiles, and that the children of govt agents should be targeted, the left just shrugs.
That is hate speech basilio.
In yet another disgusting irony, despite a clear contravention of their terms, Twitter does... absolutely nothing.
Too busy deplatforming ordinary conservatives I guess.
The putrifaction of leftist thought is a disgrace.
Exactly who was Mr Watson preaching hate against? Pointing out the monumental hypocrisy of the left in America does not constitute hate, basilio
Yet Fonda proposes a child is yanked from his mother and given over to be raped by pedophiles, and that the children of govt agents should be targeted, the left just shrugs.
That is hate speech basilio.
In yet another disgusting irony, despite a clear contravention of their terms, Twitter does... absolutely nothing.
Too busy deplatforming ordinary conservatives I guess.
The putrifaction of leftist thought is a disgrace.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,055
- Reactions
- 12,627
The White House publicity team fails again.
Personally I think Melania does care, she may well have been the deciding factor in getting Donald to reverse his decision on family separations, but what was she thinking wearing that jacket ?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-...ld-immigration-detention-centre-texas/9897146
Personally I think Melania does care, she may well have been the deciding factor in getting Donald to reverse his decision on family separations, but what was she thinking wearing that jacket ?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-...ld-immigration-detention-centre-texas/9897146
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
No she doesn't.
She sued some non-profit organisation in, from memory, her home country because they use her photo in an ad encouraging kids to learn English.
Misuse of her image, her lawyer says. Can't encourage kids to learn and not pay her for the copy rights dude.
- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,055
- Reactions
- 12,627
Maybe they used it without asking her first. If they did ask she may well have said yes.
Given the hysteria generated by anti refugee sentiments by her husband it showed some guts to run counter to that imo.
If you would care to post some links about Melania's law suit, that would be good, I can't find any.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/melania-trump-threatens-lawsuit-over-english-class-billboard/
The company wasn't non-profit, my bad.
Yea, they use her image without permission, or royalty. Can't have that.
I read that she said she plan to use her image as First Lady to make money [not her exact word
]... so she can't have people using it. Man, she should know that that's the old way to make money out of this WH gig. You gotta get a title with some influence in it. Like "Senior Adviser"... That way, you'd pulled in an easy $100M a year while Trump is the president.
Wait til later and it's too late.
- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,593
- Reactions
- 7,470
With regard to the separation and imprisonment of US aslyum seekers which has cause such grief to the families and the US public. Could there be a simpler, cheaper and just as effective measure to make sure these people are brought to a court for their hearing ?
In fact .. yes there certainly is. So what is the thinking behind mass separations of families in very expensive detention centers with all the drama that has bee created ?
In border controversy, U.S. ignores tech alternative to detention centers
Wearing an ankle monitor bracelet, a woman who identified herself as Jennifer sits at the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center after recently crossing the U.S.-Mexico border on June 21, 2018, in McAllen, Texas.
Getty
The U.S. government may have a more humane and cost-effective tech alternative to detaining families at the border. But it isn't being offered to the thousands of immigrant families that have been forcibly split over the past two months.
At least not yet.
The majority of undocumented immigrants detained by border patrol agents are enrolled in Immigration and Customs Enforcement's "Alternative to Detention" program, which uses technology to keep track of people instead of physically detaining them.
Since the pilot program kicked off in 2004, these techniques allowed for tracking through ankle bracelets, phone check-ins with voice recognition software and a mobile app. It meant that families could stay together rather than in a detention center.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united...ion-centers-immigration-trump-administration/
In fact .. yes there certainly is. So what is the thinking behind mass separations of families in very expensive detention centers with all the drama that has bee created ?
In border controversy, U.S. ignores tech alternative to detention centers
Wearing an ankle monitor bracelet, a woman who identified herself as Jennifer sits at the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center after recently crossing the U.S.-Mexico border on June 21, 2018, in McAllen, Texas.
Getty
The U.S. government may have a more humane and cost-effective tech alternative to detaining families at the border. But it isn't being offered to the thousands of immigrant families that have been forcibly split over the past two months.
At least not yet.
The majority of undocumented immigrants detained by border patrol agents are enrolled in Immigration and Customs Enforcement's "Alternative to Detention" program, which uses technology to keep track of people instead of physically detaining them.
Since the pilot program kicked off in 2004, these techniques allowed for tracking through ankle bracelets, phone check-ins with voice recognition software and a mobile app. It meant that families could stay together rather than in a detention center.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/united...ion-centers-immigration-trump-administration/
wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
I'm no fan of Clintons, or any political party.
It's not smear. Still true that she doesn't give a crap.
Turning up for a photo op is not genuine concern.
Elanor Roosevelt... now that's a First Lady that gives a dam.
wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
Yeah but that was the good old days, grasshopper.
You know, before the Democrats were all marxists.
- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,055
- Reactions
- 12,627
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
You do realise that Roosevelt's policies were Marxist right?
Capitalists crashed the US, and the world, economy. Millions were homeless, no jobs programe, no welfare benefits.
Roosevelt put those in place. Regulate the banks and investment companies etc.
wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
No they weren't Marxist, but yes they were a collectivist solution, which was actually a very poor one.
They, essentially retarded the US economy, only to be finally activated by ww2 and the baby boom.
Read some of Von Mises Institute analysis of the period... Roosevelt f***ed up.
- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,055
- Reactions
- 12,627
More fake news ?
Refugee children allegedly injected with drugs to keep them quiet.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-...dren-in-texas-centre-forcibly-drugged/9898298
Refugee children allegedly injected with drugs to keep them quiet.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-...dren-in-texas-centre-forcibly-drugged/9898298
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
Sure he screwed up.
That's why before his regulation there were market collapses every few years; during his New Deal and regulation the US saw its best days - for everyone; after it was deregulated and "free market" reign, the US is back to market collapses, rising wealth inequality, half the country more; 20% in poverty. Drug epidemic, rising suicide among White Americans.. level not seen since the Civil War and WWII.
But sure, Bush Jr.'s, Obama's, Trump's tax cuts will save the day. Third time lucky.
- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,055
- Reactions
- 12,627
Actually, there is some research around that says he did.
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
No. That was when he first took office and tried the now fashionable belt tightening/austerity measure.
That made it worst. Yes.
But with WWII forced on them, massive gov't stimulus and jobs program boosted the economy. etc.
Then come regulation, more stimulus under successive administration. Such as the interstate highways, space programs etc.
wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,950
- Reactions
- 13,241
- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
That's another "alternate" sets of facts and misinterpretation of history.
If it weren't for FDR's Marxist/Socialist policies, American democracy would have collapsed about the time Hitler took over democratic Germany.
These neoCon idiots don't know what it was that gave America its golden age. No, A Golden Age is not when greed is good and obscene wealth is gooder.
The current two generations of Americans will see their standard of living lower than that of their parents. And you cannot tell me that that's because there's more regulation and Marxism.
- Status
Similar threads
