What?

[It's Snake Pliskin]

Well lets look at some international news. Is this a genuine attack or not?
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21051496-601,00.html

 

[rederob]

Pilskin
Why don't you tell us what YOU think it is?

 

[rederob]

Good news?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6251167.stm?ls

It's interesting to see that Britain and Australia stand with Bush on his new troop pledge for Iraq, but neither will commit more themselves.
In the US, Bush's foreign policy blunders are coming home to roost, and with prominent Republicans now realising that to side with Bush is probably not a recipe for re-election.
Bush is one of the few world leaders that keeps repeating the age old adage that "two wrongs don't make a right": Fortunately 2 terms ending will.

http://www.counterpunch.org/

Although Bush sprinkles Condoleeza like confetti into Middle East politics, she will fare worst from the marriage miasma that ultimately will lead to US withdrawal from Iraq and an attendant prestige akin to that garnered from their their previous "victory" in Vietnam.

 

[It's Snake Pliskin]

Hook, line and sinker!

 

[Bobby]

Hook, line and sinker!

Hello Snake,

I don't mind scoring the match

Ist game Snake 1 - 0

Rob about to serve ~

 

[It's Snake Pliskin]

Hello Snake,

I don't mind scoring the match

Ist game Snake 1 - 0

Rob about to serve ~

Hi Bob,

This clown follows my general chat posts like fly to **** with nothing constructive to add. He is on ignore but I can read them without loggin on. So the ignore function is useless. By intentionally targeting me he is breaking the code of conduct and it will stop!

Have a good day Bob.
Regards
Snake

 

[rederob]

Hi Bob,

This clown follows my general chat posts like fly to **** with nothing constructive to add. He is on ignore but I can read them without loggin on. So the ignore function is useless. By intentionally targeting me he is breaking the code of conduct and it will stop!

Have a good day Bob.
Regards
Snake

Pilskin
I post only occasionally in reply to your thread starters.
So far you seem to lack the capacity to indulge in a reasoned discussion, and placing me on "ignore" seems a bit silly if you continue to read my replies!

My first post in this thread asked what you thought. You haven't replied to that, but believe putting up a link is of itself useful?

My second post had 2 external links and 2 paragraphs of views I hold in relation to the overall theme you presented.
Whereas your first post has one link and asks a question, without offering an opinion on the mater you present.
Your second post suggests your first post was simply to "bait" me.

In response, your third post suggests I have "nothing constructive to add".
Yet I have presented some of my views, and you have not!

Finally you suffer some delusion that I am intentionally targeting you, and then suggest that it breaks a code of conduct and that "it will stop".

If you don't want to present your views on a topic you open a new thread on, then perhaps don't open the thread in the first place and the other allegations and predispositions you suffer will stop.

 

[insider]

rederob... he was refering to bobby... unless your name is bob too... What are the Odds

And I do agree with you rederob... And by the way it's Snake Plissken...

 

[rederob]

rederob... he was refering to bobby... unless your name is bob too... What are the Odds

Two bob each way, insider.
And seeing the Snake can't do justice to Kurt's character's name, I'm just returning the favour.
:bier: