Alright Beej, what about origins of life then?
Where did DNA come from - and please don't say it built itself up from nothing!!!! or appeared from another planet!!!!
Where did life come from - and don't tell me it came from non-life!!!
Alright Beej, what about origins of life then?
Where did DNA come from - and please don't say it built itself up from nothing!!!! or appeared from another planet!!!!
Where did life come from - and don't tell me it came from non-life!!!
They're still around. Occasionally you see some of them posting on this forum too.If we evolved from the apes, then what happened to the apes left behind?
If we evolved from the apes, then what happened to the apes left behind?
Jono Jono Jono.
Why is it that whenever I see someone of a religious leaning talk about their imaginary friend, they try to find the biggest gap they can and stuff HIM into it?
A while ago religion had all the answers - and if you didn't believe those answers, there's this handy fire over here you can step into.
Then science started to figure out the real reasons behind things and suddenly the imaginary friend couldn't live there any more. The gaps get smaller and smaller, and people seem desperate to stuff that imaginary friend as far back into that gap as possible.
You seem like you are spoiling for a fight because someone doubted the existance of your imaginary friend and are looking for the biggest gap you can find to stuff him into. But just like YOU can find gaps where science hasn't explored and stick you fingers in your ears and go "la la la - see my imaginary friend exists in that gap.", science comes up with the occassional gem that when you mention it to those of a religious leaning, they tend to either a) shout even louder about their imaginary friend or b) slink off and sulk.
So here it is Jono.
Go investigate something called endogenous retroviruses.
Have fun
Sir O
Jonojpsg said:Some creationist propaganda/drivel.... plus this little gem: "Oh and Beej, those 50s experiments are so, well, 50s. "
Wow what a boring and pointless argument. Let him or her believe what they wish to believe. Then we can all have some peace on this planet!
My view: random probability at play. Not very mystic but I find my mysticism in nature. Off to Wilsons Prom soon for some real energy - the ocean, the tides, the moon, the sun, the solar system. The wonders of physics! Bliss.
Thanks for adding to the mundane pointlessness.
You know Jono I'm not surprised, because I had to ask myself, when the poll reads that nearly 3/4 of people say it's not your imaginary friend, why would come spoiling for a barney? Now me I'm not into self flagellation, but won't you shouting louder and louder at this crowd (which you KNOW don't share your beliefs) just make you seem ...well like a jerk? And consequently the philosophy you are attempting to espouse... attractive to jerks?Ossi Ossi Ossi (Oi Oi Oi),
I love a barney as you have pointed out - I also love it when people take up the challenge
Oh wow Jono. Your witty turnaround of my own words has made me realise that I have a huge whole in my life that I now must rush out and fill by devoting myself utterly to Islam. Bring me my Koran so that I may call Jihad against you you filthy heathen Christian....What you wanted me to find religion didn't you? Hmmm perhaps you shouldn't project Jono...it makes you look silly.WHy is it whenever I see someone of an atheistic leaning say they don't have an imaginary friend they try and shout down those who do? Is is because they are jealous and want to find something to fill their gap?
Hey I know a lot of maths, what particular aspect of infinite number sequences would you like to examine and how exactly do they relate to your imaginary friend? Of course when you look at the "overall picture" you filter it through the rose colored glasses of your religion, so something as basic as math has religious significance. No wait...hang on...I know this tactic This is about First Cause right? Before infinity what was there? There has to be something right? Cause and effect rules absolutely, there can't have been just nothing, that doesn't make sense. So therefore it can't be natural so it has to be supernatural. Yea and Yaweh did stretch forth his hand and made the heavens move and caused the universe to start. Oh darn I read the last bit wrong from the holy text, let me try again. And the flying spagetti monster did stretch forth his noodly appendage and stirred the sauce which caused all of us to become one with the cosmic taste. No that doesn't sound right either how about... and the great jet of steam from Russells teapot did cause the heavens to move and make us inexplicably attracted to tea.Yeah yeah, I know science is "discovering" more and more all the time about things that fundamentalists have put forward as reasons to believe in God, and endogenous retroviruses are a part of that. However when you look at the overall picture, the more science discovers, the more gaps there will be to fill (for fun, investigate infinite sequences)
I'm not going la la la, I'm just putting forward the point of view that science doesn't and cannot by definition have all the answers.
And the infinite sequences thing was just pointing out that as you divide a sequence up into more and more pieces, eg the classic half way to the door scenario, you never quite get there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?