professor_frink
Moderator
- Joined
- 16 February 2006
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 5
Who are you?
ATTENTION ALL
The admin team here are becoming increasingly annoyed at how many people who seem to only be here to participate in this thread are breaking the rules of the forum by signing up multiple accounts. I made an announcement in one of the other threads about this recently -
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6397
but it has been ignored, so I thought I would make a post here so that there can be no confusion about where we stand on this issue.
People caught using multiple accounts will be banned immediately.
If we continue to get people signing up multiple accounts to post in this thread, then we will shut it down.
Enjoy your evening.
ATTENTION ALL
The admin team here are becoming increasingly annoyed at how many people who seem to only be here to participate in this thread are breaking the rules of the forum by signing up multiple accounts.........
People caught using multiple accounts will be banned immediately.........
Thanks breaker, I fully endorse your views!!! ( I now have an imaginary IGNORE button which has been getting a severe work out lately!!!) I would just like to let those know that have expressed concerns about there not being anything in writing in regard to the anticipated 6cent annual distribution that I have e-mailed WC and received a phone call in relation to this. I have been assured that it has been fowarded to the person who deals with these matters and I will receive a return e-mail early next week. WC are more than happy for me to post the reply on the forum as they have had a lot of communication in regard to this.I read on a daily basis that many companies/funds are not giving a target rate of return re dividends or distributions for the next financial year as the market is so volitile it is hard to predict! SeamistyWell professor, may I say how good it is to hear from a moderator!!!
I am the originator of this thread and one of the founders of the PIF Action Group.
If there is anyone who has multiple accounts on this thread, you have my blessing to throw them off and be banned immediately! Don't wait, please ban them NOW!
We have many investor contributors and readers here who have had hundreds of thousands of dollars stolen or frozen by MFS/Octaviar Investment Management and are in dire straights. Investors really need to believe this thread is 100% genuine and in the best interests of those investors.
We have now had over 100,000 hits on this thread and need to be seriously looked after by moderators. I feel in the last month there have been a minority who seem to babble on about nothing and appear to be here only to disrupt this threads integrity and effectiveness!
Multiple accounts are an abuse of this thread and the investors on here!!! Multiple accounts are only here to manipulate readers and more than likely intimidate genuine contributors into silence.
Once again, Dear Moderator, please immediately remove any multiple account abusers.
I agree Juan Mortyme, please moderators expose those that have been multi-nicking, it just makes a mockery of those that have worked so hard and persevered to provide a source of information and provide some support to investors in the PIF. Sometimes I read posts and think I don't need to deal with this BS, I am far too busy and then I receive a PM or return post, saying thank you, I appreciate what you have shared etc., so like others on here, will continue to share info and ask assistance of those more qualified to advise. In a situation when there is so many people whose lives are affected by the same outcome, but with different agendas and circumstances, not everyone is going to be in agreeance with the end result. I can cope with that and hopefully remain objective. Lets all hope the end result benefits the majority. Regards, Seamisty:aus::Name and shame:shoot::shoot:
The moderator must now close this Forum as it has been compromised.
Can Breaker1, Please start a new Forum, aptly named to relfect the soon
new name of the Fund.
Maybe some legal action can be taken out against some of the scare mongers.
For example:-
Rocky1 and harry7
Javier and guesswho
The moderator must now close this Forum as it has been compromised.
JohnH the way to go would be do all this over say a 2 to 3 years We could all get installments payments along the way as well /Dane //If we are stupid enough to vote for liquidation then that has to be completed by March(?) next year. Half constructed buildings would have to be sold at bargain rates - It would be a buyer"s market. The 45 cents is based on collecting outstanding debts/or completing and selling developments at optimum time.
I agree with you Mary, It is more to see something set down in writing as an estimated target rate of distributions for those that are concerned that there was no reference made to the amount of proposed distribution for the forthcoming 12 months after Dec 08. It may just give a few some reassurance that there will be a distribution of some sort and there did seem to be some confusion as to a 3cent or 6cent amount. On a different matter, I was just reading through the PIF Annual Report for 2007 and see that the RE not only received 2.46% management fee for the year, but somewhere along the line us unitholders voted that the RE would also receive any surplus income the PIF made after expenses were paid. Can anyone confirm that this amount was an extra $464,630.00 (page51) or have I got this wrong? I was told yesterday by WC that any surplus money generated outside of the management fee/expenses, and the intended 6cent per unit annual distribution in the future will be remain in the Fund to help go towards rebuilding/restoring unit value. Was also told that the 3 unit valuations of 65,45 & 14cents have been confirmed to be within 98% correct. The independant valuation is almost completed, so hopefully those figures will be released soon. I also received a personal apology by e-mail from the two multi-nicking culprits who wish to pass on their apologies, so lets all move on and restore this forum back to where breaker1 intended it to be, a usefull link for all PIF holders. Thanks, SeamistySeamistry, What is the point in putting any pressure on WC to tell us how much we will be receiving in distributions? All you are asking her to do is answer an impossible question....and make a false promise.
NOBODY, even the best and most knowledgably informed, knows what the next few years hold economically for OZ. JH has communicated all the risks in the booklet, and they include all the many negative possiibities of the future.
She is not GOD.
Sounds like we must have faith / hope / & keep our heads in the sand to me / Dane ///Seamistry, What is the point in putting any pressure on WC to tell us how much we will be receiving in distributions? All you are asking her to do is answer an impossible question....and make a false promise.
NOBODY, even the best and most knowledgably informed, knows what the next few years hold economically for OZ. JH has communicated all the risks in the booklet, and they include all the many negative possiibities of the future.
She is not GOD.
Until this moment i have resisted responding to any of the crap that comes out of you mouth,other than the fact i have dubed you Magoo for obvious reasons,i have restrained myself pretty well i thought (HOW CAN IT TAKE 2 HOURS) to vote on three issues if WC wont let anybody talk, you idiot. I notice that the Moderators of the threads have called for you to answer your mail, i sincerely hope they remove you from this forum as you are obviously to old to comprehend the wishes of those who are useing it in a constructive manner with positive input,either remove yourself or i hope they do it for you. FlatbackWell thats new to me Flatback When i spoke to WC they told me there would be no discussion or comments from the floor the lady said why bother coming it will be rather boring The vote would have been decided before any of us walked into the room she said it could be all over in 1 to 2 hours / The Dame //
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?