- Joined
- 7 August 2008
- Posts
- 36
- Reactions
- 0
Timeline
- WC’s original date for vote was August
- PTQ went to court to wind up OCV July 24 and 25, but JH and CS stopped that.
- OCV’s original deadline for Creditor offer Aug 11
- Creditor offer deadline extended to Aug 29th because most (big) creditors want more time to negotiate (but not JH!)
- PTQ (or new trustee?) going to court to wind up OCV Sept 9 and 10
- WC’s vote changed to Sept 18
I spoke with WC hotline yesterday and was told the NSX is the only exit option in the short term apart from the off market transfer option which is available right now if you can organise it. When asked if redemptions can be started up again when the fund is stable and brining in money again the answer was that it won’t be that kind of fund – redemptions will be removed from the constitution all together in the Sept vote.
When asked why we won’t be given the option for a moratorium the answer (when you cut thought the spiel) is that WC aren’t interested in that option. What happened to give priority to the members’ interests! And don’t tell me we aren’t interested – we've basically been told this is not an option and haven't been given any info on this to enable us to decide.
Hi Sugar, You will receive an annual 6cent per unit distribution until such times as the Fund has stabilised. The distribution amount will then be re-assessed. We will also receive any money that WC receive in relation the Support Facility as a one of payment.I would imagine the units would become more attractive to buyers on the NSX as the unit distribution value increases, similar to a share that pays a dividend I guess. Regards, SeamistyHi all, what does this mean....if we are not going to get redemptions then how do we receive income?
Voice 1: Hey Jem, thanks for taking that basket case off my hands.
Voice 2: Hmmmm you owe me one! Funny how people think I’M going to pay YOU for this thing.
Voice 1: We had the option to pass it off to Brian the liquidator, but we sure as hell couldn’t show anyone else the books. You remember Brian from my wedding?
Voice 2: Yeah of course - the best man, I’ve got him lined up if things go our way in Sept….But you know things aren’t going to plan, they seem to LIKE me.
Voice 1: Put a couple of farts in your youtube presentations, that’ll take care of your PR problem. But you know these people have short memory spans, you might need to move the vote back to Aug.
Voice 2: Nah, need to make sure you are out of the woods first.
Voice 1: So what’ll ya do if the vote doesn’t go your way?
Voice 2: Oh well I’ll be stuck with this thing won’t I…..The NTA will go back up and I’ll collect my 6 mill a year. It’s not like the NTA means much once it’s listed. I might just need to buy another answering machine.
The events depicted in this story are fictitious. Any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental.
Hi Sugar, I have NO IDEA what the outcome of this will be!!!!! Maybe some of the conspiracy theorists out there can work this into something interesting or we will just have to wait until the media gets hold of it LOL!!! It's been a bit boring on here lately, maybe this will instigate some renewed interest on the thread. Seamisty:flush:Morning Seamisty... can you please explain what that means to the PIF fund?
Hi all, what does this mean....if we are not going to get redemptions then how do we receive income?
Hi Sugar, I have NO IDEA what the outcome of this will be!!!!! Maybe some of the conspiracy theorists out there can work this into something interesting or we will just have to wait until the media gets hold of it LOL!!! It's been a bit boring on here lately, maybe this will instigate some renewed interest on the thread. Seamisty:flush:
DUPED, OCV is calling a meeting of noteholders on the 3rd Sept, I think the gist of it is to pass a couple of resolutions to officially remove PTQ and vote in the new Trustee. Regards, SeamistyI'm with you Seamisty. I have no idea.
Can't work out PTQ's motives. One thing that stands out in my memory is during the court action in July (24?) there was some argey bargey about PTQ's right to have a say about their successor. From memory: OCV pushed for a ruling that PTQ had no say. At the time I thought: What's the big deal, if PTQ want out, why do they care so much? OK - PTQ wouldn't want to damage their reputation by appearing to abandon the unit holders. But dedicating court time to it? Now they want to recind their resignation.
Do PTQ really want to stay in play or are they just making sure they'll look like they did everything they could for the OCVG unit holders. Their ace is that they resigned before the OCV Ltd share price drubbing in Jan.
Hmmmm.
DUPED, OCV is calling a meeting of noteholders on the 3rd Sept, I think the gist of it is to pass a couple of resolutions to officially remove PTQ and vote in the new Trustee. Regards, Seamisty
Only the noteholders can vote Sugar, Ocv need a 50% + vote to stop the company from going into immediate liquidation. I would think they will romp it in because creditors will benefit more by the offer already put foward to them from OCV than from a firesale liquidation in my opinion.Don't forget that the PIF has only officially had $50mill legally aknowledged as OCV debt, the remaining $147mill has been recognised by OCV but not legally registered. If OCV is liquidated PIF will more than likely only receive 11.8cents in the dollar on the $50mill, that is why WC has been fighting so hard against liquidation of OCV. Regards, Seamistycan we stop them doing that?
Well well well, we are all at it again,aren't we, the so called expert unit holders who know everything,they must be putting threads on this forum for their friends who are in trouble,(not themselves no,no,no)i thought that there were going to be changes to the constitution at this meeting that we had to agree to, i dont believe that this meeting will only be for the agreement for or against the proposal put forward by JH, REMEMBER THIS there only needs to be 100 members at this meeting to call an emergency general meeting immediately,and any proposal put forward that isnt agree'd to, can be either recinded or ammended by those present, if there is nothing in the proposals put forward by JH, whereby we the unit holders, dont have an exit ability beyond the NSX,where we are at the whims of the market,maybe 20c maybe maybe maybe,we all came into this PIF because of the strength of the fund and security intimated(not so was it), now we are being asked to leave our money in something which has no guarantee's at all, i paid an honest dollar for every unit i purchased,and i expect somebody who thinks this fund is still able to be resurrected to be a good fund again, can expect us to lay down and be left to the whims of the market, my final word on the meeting can somebody try to organise a registrar of those going to this meeting before hand ,so that they are prepared to call a EGM.This is not a jib at you Duped just a continuation of the subject matter.My guess: It will be left to WC to decide when and how much we get. Much like a company decides when dividends get paid out and how much. We'll find out for sure when we get our voting materials.
Greetings from the Gold Coast. Is everyone impressed by the way business is done here ? Doesn't matter whether you're in finance, property development or tourism, the same rules apply :-
1. Main objective - stuff as much cash as possible into your own pockets.
2. Have little or no regard for investors & have no sense of responsibility to them.
3. Have little or no regard for business ethics, corporate responsibility or corporate law for that matter.
4. Set up a complex web of $1 subsidiary companies to shift around the money so that it gets distributed to other complex company structures of which you have a vested interest in.
6. Make sure you get a couple of smarta..se coporate lawyers involved to ensure that you can't be held personally responsible for anything.
7. At the end of the day, brush the dirt off your expensive suit (or red leather jacket) and move onto the next project.
Make no mistake, in the business sense the Gold Coast is a small place. I can't help believing that this crew of people from MFS / Octaviar / Wellington are related - associated - doing deals. Who offered Wellington the RE job ? Who appointed the board from Wellington as the board of directors of Octaviar IM (previous RE). HMMMMMMM...............
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?