- Joined
- 4 May 2008
- Posts
- 288
- Reactions
- 0
Nobody cares how much you know, until they know how much you care.
Theodore Roosevelt
It is time for JH to show that it is the investors in PIF that comes 1st.
Nobody cares how much you know, until they know how much you care.
Theodore Roosevelt
It is time for JH to show that it is the investors in PIF that comes 1st.
"If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn't sit for a month." - Theodore Roosevelt
"Obedience of the law is demanded; not asked as a favor." - Theodore Roosevelt
My favourite:
"A man who has never gone to school may steal from a freight car; but if he has a university education, he may steal the whole railroad." - Theodore Roosevelt
WHO is telling us what Octaviars 35% stake in Stella is really worth? In an MFS ASX announcement in Aug,07 MFS said..."the Stella Group PRESENTLY contributes more than 55% of the company's recurring earnings ...." In a June 23, 2008 .com news report...Stella owns and franchises Austalian hotel brands including Peppers and Saville as well as travel agencies including Harvey World travel and HRG.With a 74% stake in Africa's Protea Hotels, which runs 126 hotels in 13 countries, and 40% of the Golden Tulip chain, the company manages about 49,000 rooms and provided almost half of Octaviars sales last year.." Are the 49,000 rooms still PRESENTLY contributing?(they must produce a nice return!!!) How much of these assets are still there? If, mostly, they are, surely they are worth more than $215 million?Didn't CVC buy 65% of Stella for 400M cash + 900M debt a few months ago? Wouldn't that make the 35% share worth around 650M? Keep in mind this was a fire sale price at the time. Then in recent weeks reports of the 35% Stella stake being worth 400M with OCV having another 170M in cash? In no time at all the stake in Stella lost another 250M somewhere... Now looking at the balance sheet page 18 of the OCV announcement it appears that the 35% stake in Stella is valued at 215M? Another 185M up in smoke and that's if OCV retains it's stake and doesn't liquidate? Would anyone be able to explain this?
To me it looks like OCV is crying poor in an attempt to rid OCV of certain creditors and legal claims against it. Once that's taken care of OCV will have an asset which could be sold in the not too distant future for, say, 650M to the benefit of OCV and any note holders that are willing to hang on, leaving creditors like the PIF out in the cold.
Why should OCV be forgiven any debt or legal claim against it and be allowed to continue as a going concern and possibly reap profits from our loss after its crimes? I pity the OCV shareholders however, these people had access to MFS balance sheets prior to investing whereas we have been outright lied to and stolen from.
Currently the difference between continuation of OCV and liquidation equates to roughly 2c per PIF unit. You are going to need to do a lot better that that! Let us call their bluff and liquidate them to see what Stella is really worth! Plus there's the added benefit of making the world a better place
OR
Why doesn't OCV just admit defeat, carve up their stake in Stella plus their remaining cash and give it to the creditors? At a guess the PIF would get roughly 20% of the 35% stake or 7% of Stella, plus 30M cash which sounds a lot better than 50M to me.
This is a perfect opportunity for JH to demonstrate to us all that JH is not in CS' pocket!
Boots
So where does this leave the OCV proposal if the PTQ step in and say ok, thats it folks, all over. Or can OCV secure an undertaking from its 5 major creditors to the effect that thay are willing to take the deal in principle prior to next weeks meeting so that they can present it and ask for more time? This is too complicated for me! Does JH need approval from PIF investors or can she accept the deal on behalf of the RE? If OCV are not ordered to liquidate I agree with what deano1 and Javiar are saying. SeamistyCoolangatta 9C - 22C. Fine Weather
July 19, 2008 04:59am
Octaviar wind-up case now next weekEmmaline Stigwood
July 19th, 2008
A WINDING-up application against Octaviar and several subsidiaries will be heard next week in Brisbane after concerns about the rate the Gold Coast company was chewing up cash.
Lawyers for the Public Trustee of Queensland yesterday asked the Supreme Court in Brisbane to urgently list the case instead of the planned hearing date in September.
Walter Sofronoff, QC, for the trustee, argued financial statements showed Octaviar (formerly MFS) companies were still spending millions, leaving less and less for creditors.
"The more time that rolls on, the more tens of millions of cash that are being spent," he said.
Mr Sofronoff noted more than $15 million had been spent on external consultants including a 'turnaround specialist' and the Public Trustee was 'not minded to place great faith' in an 'unofficial winding-up scheme' offer sent to creditors on Thursday night and yesterday.
Lawyers for Octaviar argued it needed until September to see if creditors would take up its deal under the unofficial scheme.
Barrister Brian O'Donnell, QC, for Octaviar, said the companies had been operating prudently since January in a bid to stem loses and meet debt-repayment obligations.
However, Justice Richard Chesterman said the company had already sold its major asset, a 65 per cent stake in the Stella tourism group, and expenses seemed to be still eating into the asset base of the company.
He ordered the case be heard on July 24 and 25, with advertisements to be placed in the media today to notify creditors.
......Can anybody tell us how Stella is performing at the moment?.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?