If you go back to the other week when i met with her, I already answered that YES she has a right to list on the NSX and yes Dora they are the only 3 choices we have. That is why I said WAIT and see what JH has to say. If we don't like it we can ask her to put it to a vote to wind it up. Changing the re is a choice. Look if she says that listing on the NSX is if you want your money now and that is the ONLY form at this stage of ANY liquidity, then so be it. Read your PDS folks, it states no guarantee of capital and no g'tee of distributions. So she is using the NSX as a way to unfreeze the funds and get something. NOW if this is only a secondary means and she has an orderly time frame for getting back our capital as investments mature and assets are sold and realised and it is a finite plan and we get distributions in the meantime, that is in effect winding it up AND in the meantime she tries getting misappropriated funds via the courts, then what is wrong with that. The NSX only screws people who have to sell their units, either way we get screwed, but if you can hold out, you get maximum value as the fund starts getting maximum value. This is the way I see it, and if she puts that to us and doesn't try and lock our money in forever in a day, then we should consider. Let's hear the woman out, then exercise our rights if we need to.